Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 164, 2020
Topical Problems of Green Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering 2019 (TPACEE 2019)
Article Number 03024
Number of page(s) 10
Section Energy Efficiency in Transportation
Published online 05 May 2020
  1. E. Ruocco, L. Di, Raffaele, V. Minutolo, Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 16, 25-34 (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.proeps.2016.10.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Dong, X. Bie, J. Tian, X. Xie and G. F. Du, Experimental and Numerical Study on the Strain Behavior of Buried Pipelines Subjected to an Impact Load. (2019). DOI: 10.3390/app9163284 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Massa, N. Galgoul, N. Junior, A. Fernandes, F. Coelho, S. Neto, The Influence of Internal Pressure on Pipeline Natural Frequency (2009). DOI: 10.1115/OMAE2009-79666 [Google Scholar]
  4. O. Fyrileiv, O. Aamlid, E. Andreassen, Pipeline Free Spans: Influence of Internal Pressure (2010). DOI: 10.1115/OMAE2010-20628 [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Georgiadou, E. Loukogeorgaki, D. Angelides, Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 80-87 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  6. W.-H. Xü, W.-D. Xie, X.-F. Gao, Y.-X. Ma, Journal of Ship Mechanics, 22, 446-453 (2018) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2018.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  7. G. P. Kourctzis, Sloan, Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to ground surface settlement and heave. (2014) DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2014-0332 [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Sokolov, I. Razov and Y. Ogorodnova, Effect of Internal Pressure on Parametric Vibrations and Dynamic Stability of Thin-Walled Ground Pipeline Larger Diameter Connect with Elastic Foundation (2016). DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20167304002 [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Sokolov, I. Razov, Free vibrations of thin-walled semi-underground main gas pipelines of large diameter, with the attached ground mass. (2017) DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710602021 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Bochkarev, Computational Continuum Mechanics, 10, 406-415. (2017). DOI: 10.7242/1999-6691/2017.10.4.32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. E.L. Kuzneczova, D.V. Leonenko, E`.I. Starovojtov, MTT, 3, 152-160 (2015). DOI: 10.3103/S0025654415030127 [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Dražić, N. Vatin. Procedia Engineering. 2016. 165. Pp. 883–890. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.788. [Google Scholar]
  13. G.G. Sheng, X. Wang, J. Reinf. Plast. Comp., 27(2), 117-134 (2008). DOI: 10.5050/KSNVE.2013.24.3.261 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. L.H. Donnel, Trans. ASME, 56(11), 86–94 (1934). [Google Scholar]
  15. A.V. Dmitriev, V.G. Sokolov, A.V. Bereznyov Transportny`e sooruzheniya, 3, (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.