Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2020
2020 2nd International Conference on Civil Architecture and Energy Science (CAES 2020)
Article Number 04068
Number of page(s) 9
Section Civil, Architectural Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016504068
Published online 01 May 2020
  1. Bandini A., Berry P., Boldini D. (2015) Tunneling-induced landslides: the Val di Gambro tunnel case study. Engineering Geology 196(9): 71-87. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barla G., Debernardi D., Perino A. (2015) Lessons learned from deep-seated landslides activated by tunnel excavation. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 8(5): 394-401. [Google Scholar]
  3. Causse L., Cojean R., Fleurisson, J.A. (2015) Interaction between tunnel and unstable slope-influence of time-dependent behavior of a tunnel excavation in a deep-seated gravitational slope deformation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 50(8): 270-281. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, J.Y., Jing, L.I., Qiang, X.U., et al. (2016) Numerical simulation of Landslide surge and its effects on gravity dam[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science). [Google Scholar]
  5. Hungr O., McDougall S. (2009) Two numerical models for landslide dynamic analysis. Computers and Geosciences 35(5):978-992. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lian B., Wang X., Zhu R., et al. (2018) A numerical simulation study of landslides induced by irrigation in Heifangtai loess area—A case study of Huangci[J]. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 108(3):032064. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhao, L.H., Hou, S.C., Mao, J. (2016) Review of numerical simulation of landslides and surges in reservoir districts[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mao, J.Q., Zhou, D.P., (2002) Deformation analysis of landslide-tunnel interaction[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 37(4) : 371-376. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Ma, H.M., (2003) Discussion on Problems of Slope Disaster and Tunnel deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 22:2719-2724. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Peng, W.B., (2007) FLAC3D practical tutorial [M]. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Tao, Z.P., (2003) Study on Tunnel Deformation Mechanism at Landslide Site and Disaster Predicting and Controlling[D]. Chengdu,Southwest Jiaotong University. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Wu, H.G., Wu, D.Y., Ma, H.M., etc (2012) research on type of tunnel landslide system and tunnel deformation mode [j]. chinese journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 31 (supper2) 3632-3642. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, J., Ward, S.N., Xiao, L. (2015) Numerical simulation of the December 4, 2007 landslide-generated tsunami in Chehalis Lake, Canada[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 201(1):372-376. [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, D.P., Chen, Y.M., (2008) FLAC/FLAC3D foundation and engineering example [M]. Beijing: China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang, T., Zhou, D.P., Ma, H.M., et al (2010) Point safety factor method for stability analysis of landslide[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, (3) :971-975. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang, T., You, X., Qin, Y.T., et al (2010) Application of point safety factor to study on spatial sliding mechanism of landslide[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,45 (5) : 794-799. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Yamada, M., Mangeney, A., Matsushi, Y., et al. (2016) Estimation of dynamic friction of the Akatani landslide from seismic waveform inversion and numerical simulation[J]. Geophysical Journal International:ggw216. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, X., Krabbenhoft, K., Sheng, D., et al. (2015) Numerical simulation of a flow-like landslide using the particle finite element method[J]. Computational Mechanics, 55(1):167-177. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.