Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 166, 2020
The International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters (ICSF 2020)
Article Number 13018
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Economy
Published online 22 April 2020
  1. A. Mazur, Nauka innov. 2, 102–112 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Katić, I. Ćosić, A. Kupusinac, M. Vasiljević, I. Stojić, Therm. Sci. 20, 451–461 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Ivrampov, Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini 6, 109–116 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Bikse, I. Lusena-Ezera, B. Rivza, Innovative startups: challenges and development opportunities in Latvia. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 10, 261–273 (2018). doi:10.1108/IJIS-05-2017-0044 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Bezuhla, I. Kinash, U. Andrusiv, O. Dovgal, Attracting Foreign Direct Investment as an Economic Challenge for Ukraine in the Context of Globalization. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Modeling, Development and Strategic Management of Economic System, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of oil and gas, TC Bukovel, 24-25 October 2019 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Marlen, Fostering sustainability by linking cocreation and relationship management concepts. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 179–188 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.059 [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Poszytek, M. Jezowski, The index of higher education-business engagement a methodology of the instrument monitoring university-business relations. Paper presented at the 9th International MultiConference on Complexity, Informatics and Cybernetics, Orlando, Florida, 13-16 March 2018 D. Schamberger, N. Cleven, Performance Effects of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation Strategies and the Moderating Role of External Innovation Partners. Ind. Innovat. 20, 336-356 (2013). doi:10.1080/13662716.2013.805928 [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Rauter, D. Globocnik, E. Perl-Vorbach, R. Baumgartner, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 4, 226–233 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Miorando, J. Ribeiro, M. Cortimiglia, An economic-probabilistic model for risk analysis in technological innovation projects. J. Technovation 8, 485–498 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Olson, J. Birge, J. Linton, Risk and Uncertainty Management in Technological Innovation. J. Technovation 8, 395–398 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Kankhva, Methodic Approaches to Cost Evaluation of Innovation Projects in Underground Development. Procedia Engineering 165, 1305–1309 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.855 [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Zorzo, C. Diehl, J. Venturini, E. Zambon, The relationship between the focus on innovation and economic efficiency: a study on Brazilian electric power distribution companies. J. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação 14, 235–249 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.rai.2017.03.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Spatvinskyi, Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini 1, 104–121 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Rud, Visnyk Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu 2, 48–57 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Copeland, T. Koller, J. Murrin, Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies, 5th edn. (John Wiley, Hoboken, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  16. O. Žižlavský, Net Present Value Approach: Method for Economic Assessment of Innovation Projects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 156, 506–512 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.230 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zakon No. 991-XIV, Pro spetsialnyi rezhym innovatsiinoi diialnosti tekhnolohichnykh parkiv, Accessed 16 Jul 2019 [Google Scholar]
  18. Proekt Zakonu Ukrainy, Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo diialnosti tekhnolohichnykh parkiv No. 0943, Accessed 29 Aug 2019 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.