Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 167, 2020
2020 11th International Conference on Environmental Science and Development (ICESD 2020)
Article Number 06001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Sustainable Development
Published online 24 April 2020
  1. Magretta, J. (2002) Why Business Models Matter, Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School. [Google Scholar]
  2. Teece, D. J. (2010) Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43, 172-194. [Google Scholar]
  3. Elkington, J. (1994) Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development, California Management Review 36, Volume 2, pp 90–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee, S.; Geum, Y.; Lee, H and Park, Y. (2012) Dynamic and multidimensional measurement of product-service system (PSS) sustainability: a triple bottom line (TBL)-based system dynamics approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 32, pp. 173-182. [Google Scholar]
  5. Willard, B. (2012) The New Sustainability Advantage: seven business case benefits from a triple bottom line. New Society Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  6. Milne, M.J. and Gray, R. (2013) W(h)iter Ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting, Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 118, No.1, pp. 118-113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Venkatesh, G. (2010) Triple Bottom line approach to individual and global sustainability; Problems of Sustainable Development; 5(2), 29-37. [Google Scholar]
  8. Isaksson, R.B.; Garvare, R. and Johnson, M. (2015) The crippled bottom line – measuring and managing sustainability, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(3), 334-355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frecè J. T.; Harder D. L. (2018) Organisations beyond Brundtland: A Definition of Corporate Sustainability Based on Corporate Values, Journal of Sustainable Development, Volume 11, pp. 184-193. [Google Scholar]
  10. WWF (2010) Living Planet Report 2010. Information available at: ns/living_planet_report_timeline/lpr_2010/ [last accessed August 30th 2019]. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sneddon, C; Howarth, R. B.; Noorgaard, R. B. (2006) Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological Economics. Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 253-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. United Nations (2008) Kyoto Protocol Targets for the first commitment period. Information available in html format at: [last accessed August 30th 2019]. [Google Scholar]
  13. United Nations (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Information available at: ents/5987our-common-future.pdf [last accessed August 30th 2019] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zoboli, R. (1994). The integrated use of economic instruments in the policy of municipal solid waste. The Management of Municipal Solid Waste in Europe, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  15. Inner Valencia Consortium (Consorcio Valencia Interior) (2019) Mi Cuenta Ambiental. Information available in html format at: [last accessed September 20th 2019] [Google Scholar]
  16. URBANREC (2019) New Approaches for the Valorisation of urban bulky waste into high added value recycled products. Information available in html format at : [last accessed November 20th 2019] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.