Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 170, 2020
6th International Conference on Energy and City of the Future (EVF’2019)
Article Number 06019
Number of page(s) 6
Section City and Buildings of Future
Published online 11 June 2020
  1. R. Forrest and A. Kearns, “Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood,” Urban Studies, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2125-2143, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. M. Salama and R. Y. Gharib, “A Perceptual Approach for Investigating Urban Space Diversity in the City of,” Open House International, vol. 37, no. 2, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Legeby and L. Marcus, “Does the Urban Structure of Swedish Cities Inhibit the Sharing of Public Space?,” Built Environment, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 155-169, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Bibeva, “Public space and its role for segregation, identity and everyday life.,” Stockholm University, Stockholm, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Chen, T. Liu, X. Xie, and B. G. Marusic, “What Attracts People to Visit Community Open Spaces? A Case Study of the Overseas Chinese Town Community in Shenzhen, China,” International Journal of Enironmental Research and Public Health, vol. 13, no. 644, pp. 1-17, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Nieuwenhuis, “New Urbanism,” Provo # 9, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Jenks and N. Dempsey, “Defining the neighbourhood: Challenges for empirical research,” The Town planning review vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 153-177, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Nochian, O. M. Tahir, S. Maulan, and M. Rakhshanderoo, “A Comprehensive Public Open Space Categorization Using Classification System for Sustainable Development of Public Open Spaces,” Alam Cipta, pp. 29-40, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Gottdiener, The Social Production of Urban SPace. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  10. “Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation (URDPFI) Guidelines Vol 1,” GOI MoUD, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  11. B. W. Stanley and B. L. Stark, “Urban Open Spaces in Historical Perspective: A Transdisciplinary Typology and Analysis,” Urban Geography, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1089–1117, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Raman and N. Dempsey, “Cultural Diversity and Spatial Structure in the Indian Urban Context,” Journal of Urban Design, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 425-447, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Gri, “Social cohension created through Public Spaces in Toronto Neighbourhoods,” Technical Transactions, no. 6, pp. 1-4, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Giddens, The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Hillier and J. Hanson, The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Lefebvre, The Production of Space. Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Weinert, “Making Sense of Lefebvre’s “The Production of Space”,” Ethnology in Halle, Accessed on: August[Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  18. R. M. Chitrakar, “Transformation of Public Space in Contemporary Urban Neighbourhoods of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: An Investigation of Changing Provision, Use and Meaning,” Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Górska and A. Materna, “What is the value of BREEAM Communities?,” Aalborg University, Aalborg, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. L. A. Griffith, “Structuring Neighbourhood Space: An Investigation into the Production of Neighbourhood Space as Planned, Practiced, and Lived in Post-Industrial Norway,” University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Parashar, “Living Street-Aspects of Public Space in Jethabhai ni Pol & Aranya,” The University of British Colombia, Vancouver, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Sejpal, “Theory and City Form: The Case of Ahmedabad,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Ahmedabad, 1987. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.