EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 171 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 171 (2020) 01001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 171, 2020
The 9th International Scientific-Technical Conference on Environmental Engineering, Photogrammetry, Geoinformatics – Modern Technologies and Development Perspectives (EEPG Tech 2019)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 5
Section Environmental Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017101001
Published online 09 June 2020
  1. T. Wallace, D. Gibbons, M. O’Dwyer, and T.P. Curran, “International evolution of fat, oil and grease (FOG) waste management – A review,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 187, pp. 424–435, Feb. 2017. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Goga, B. Singh Chauhan, S. Kumar Mahla, H. Muk Cho, A. Dhir, and H. Chang Lim, “Properties and characteristics of various materials used as biofuels: A review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 5, no. 14, pp. 28438–28445, Jan. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Awad, K. Loubar, and M. Tazerout, “Experimental investigation on the combustion, performance and pollutant emissions of biodiesel from animal fat residues on a direct injection diesel engine,” Energy, vol. 69, pp. 826–836, May 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P.G. Blakeman, A.F. Chiffey, P.R. Phillips, M.V. Twigg, and A.P. Walker, “Developments in diesel emission aftertreatment technology,” SAE Tech. Pap., 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. D.A. Kouremenos, D.T. Hountalas, and K.B. Binder, “The effect of EGR on the performance and pollutant emissions of heavy duty diesel engines using constant and variable AFR,” SAE Tech. Pap., vol. 2001, no. 724, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  6. A.M. Hochhauser, “Review of prior studies of fuel effects on vehicle emissions,” SAE Tech. Pap., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 541–567, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Johnson, “Vehicular Emissions in Review,” SAE Int. J. Engines, vol. 7, no. 3, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  8. D.T. Hountalas, G.C. Mavropoulos, T.C. Zannis, and S.D. Mamalis, “Use of water emulsion and intake water injection as NOx reduction techniques for heavy duty diesel engines,” SAE Tech. Pap., vol. 2006, no. 724, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Kawano, H. Ishii, Y. Goto, A. Noda, and Y. Aoyagi, “Application of biodiesel fuel to modern diesel engine,” SAE Tech. Pap., no. 724, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. M.K. Veltman, P.K. Karra, and S.C. Kong, “Effects of biodiesel blends on emissions in low temperature diesel combustion,” SAE Tech. Pap., 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Okamoto et al., “Impact study of high biodiesel blends on exhaust emissions to advanced aftertreatment systems,” SAE Tech. Pap., 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Gysel, G. Karavalakis, T. Durbin, D. Schmitz, and A. Cho, “Emissions and redox activity of biodiesel blends obtained from different feedstocks from a heavy-duty vehicle equipped with DPF/SCR aftertreatment and a heavy-duty vehicle without control aftertreatment,” SAE Tech. Pap., vol. 1, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Czerwinski, Y. Zimmerli, M. Meyer, and M. Kasper, “A modern HD-diesel engine with rapeseed oil, DPF and SCR,” SAE Tech. Pap., vol. 2008, no. 724, pp. 776–790, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Mizushima, S. Sato, D. Kawano, A. Saito, and Y. Takada, “A Study on NOx Emission Characteristics When Using Biomass-derived Diesel Alternative Fuels,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 892–899, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Wu, J. Ferns, H. Li, and G. Andrews, “Investigation of Combustion and Emission Performance of Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (HVO) Diesel,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr., vol. 10, no. 3, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Senthil Kumar, A. Kerihuel, J. Bellettre, and M. Tazerout, “Experimental investigations on the use of preheated animal fat as fuel in a compression ignition engine,” Renew. Energy, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1443–1456, Jul. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Golimowski, P. Pasyniuk, and W.A. Berger, “Common rail diesel tractor engine performance running on pure plant oil,” Fuel, vol. 103, pp. 227–231, Jan. 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Golimowski, W.A. Berger, P. Pasyniuk, W. Rzeźnik, M. Czechlowski, and A. Koniuszy, “Biofuel parameter dependence on waste fats’ fatty acids profile,” Fuel, vol. 197, pp. 482–487, Jun. 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Suchamalawong, S. Pengnarapat, P. Reubroycharoen, and T. Vitidsant, “Biofuel preparation from waste chicken fat using coal fly ash as a catalyst: Optimization and kinetics study in a batch reactor,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 103155, Jun. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. S.M. Safieddin Ardebili and A. Khademalrasoul, “An analysis of liquid-biofuel production potential from agricultural residues and animal fat (case study: Khuzestan Province),” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 204, pp. 819–831, Dec. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Domínguez-Sáez, G.A. Rattá, and C.C. Barrios, “Prediction of exhaust emission in transient conditions of a diesel engine fueled with animal fat using Artificial Neural Network and Symbolic Regression,” Energy, vol. 149, pp. 675–683, Apr. 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Kleinová, I. Vailing, J. Lábaj, J. Mikulec, and J. Cvengroš, “Vegetable oils and animal fats as alternative fuels for diesel engines with dual fuel operation,” Fuel Process. Technol., vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1980–1986, Oct. 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C.C. Barrios, A. Domínguez-Sáez, C. Martín, and P. Álvarez, “Effects of animal fat based biodiesel on a TDI diesel engine performance, combustion characteristics and particle number and size distribution emissions,” Fuel, vol. 117, pp. 618–623, Jan. 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ranjith, V. Velmurugan, and S. Thanikaikarasan, “Prediction of Exhaust Gas Emission characteristics using Neem oil blended bio- diesel in diesel engine,” Mater. Today Proc., Sep. 2019. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.