Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 175, 2020
XIII International Scientific and Practical Conference “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness – INTERAGROMASH 2020”
Article Number 06009
Number of page(s) 15
Section Land Management and Cadastres
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017506009
Published online 29 June 2020
  1. I.Yu. Grishin, R.R. Timirgaleeva, Materials of the III All-Russian Scientific Conference “Ecology and Space” named after academician K.Ya. Kondratyev (St. Petersburg, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Grishin, R. Timirgaleeva, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 1. Ser. “Selected Papers of the 1st International Scientific Conference Convergent Cognitive Information Technologies, Convergent 2016 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. V.G. Bezborodov, The State and Prospects of Using the Results of Space Activities in the Interests of Modernizing the Economy of the Russian Federation and Developing Its Regions (Entsitech, Moscow, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. T.M. Komendanova, E.G. Imeskenova, Yu.V. Abgaldaev, Bulletin of the Buryat State Agricultural Academy 3(40), 63-68 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  5. The passport of the national program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. Q.B. Le, E. Nkonya, A. Mirzabaev, Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement — A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development (Springer International Publishing, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. V.A. Rozhkov, I.O. Alyabina, V.M. Kolesnikova, E.N. Molchanov, V.S. Stolbovoy, S.A. Shoba, Soil Science 1, 3–6 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  8. A.P. Glinushkin, V.N. Kudeyarov, M.S. Sokolov, V.E. Zinchenko, V.V. Chernenko, Biogeosystem Technique 5(2), 164-196 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. V.I. Kiryushin, Agriculture 7, 3-6 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Braun Von, A. Mirzabaev, Baltic Region 8, 33-44 (2016) doi :10.5922/2079-8555-2016-3-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Drosos, A. Piccolo, Land Degradation & amp, amp Development 29(6), 1792-1805 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Elbasiouny, J. Soil. Sci. 58(4), 399-415 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. A.S. Yakovlev, V.M. Gendugov, G.P. Glazunov, M.V. Evdokimova, E.A. Shulakova, Soil Science 8, 984–995 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  14. F.N. Lisetskiy, E.I. Ergina, Soil Science 6, 643–657 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  15. E.I. Ergina, S.G. Cherny, Scientiific notes. Tauride National University named after V.I. Vernadsky, Ser. Geography 24(63)-2.3, 67–72 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  16. E.I. Ergina, Geopolitics and Ecogeodynamics of Regions 8(1-2), 62–72 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  17. E.V. Shein, I.M. Ryzhova, Mathematical Modeling in Soil Science (“IE Marakushev A. B.”, Moscow, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. I.M. Mikhailenko, V.N. Timoshin, Taurian Bulletin of Agrarian Science 1(13), 63–74 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Bonfante, F. Terribile, J. Bouma, SOIL 5, 1-14 (2019) https://doi.org/10.5194/soil5-1-2019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S.Yu. Blokhina, Bulletin of the Russian Agricultural Science 5 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. I.S. Kozubenko, I.Yu. Savin, Bulletin of the Russian Agricultural Science 5, 9–11 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. K.N. Kulik, A.V. Koshelev, Forestry Journal 3, 107–114 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Chervan’, The Proceedings of the 10th International Soil Science Congress, Environment and Soil Resources Conservation (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. A.M. Melesse, Q. Weng, P.S. Thenkabail, G.B. Senay, Sensors 7(12), 3209-3241 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. The CEOS database (2019) http://database.eohandbook.com/timeline/timeline.aspx [Google Scholar]
  26. E.A. Lupyan, A.A. Mazurov, R.R. Nazirov, A.A. Proshin, E.V. Flitman, Yu.S. Krasheninnikova, Modern Problems of Remote Sensing of the Earth from Space 8(1), 26-43 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  27. E.A. Lupyan, V.P. Savorsky, Yu.I. Shokin, A.I. Aleksanin, R.R. Nazirov, I.V. Nedoluzhko, O.Yu. Panova, Modern Problems of Remote Sensing of the Earth from Space 9(5), 21-44 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  28. A.F. Sidko, I.Yu. Pugacheva, A.P. Shevyrnogov, Journal of Siberian Federal University, Engineering & Technologies 2, 100-110 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  29. K. Panigrahy, S. Ray, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 37(2), 325-333 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. S.B. Idso, R.D. JacksonJr,. P.J. Pinter, M.S. Moran, R.J. Reginato, J.L. Hartfield, Agricultural Meteorology 24, 45–55 (1981) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S.J. Zwart, W.G.M. Bastiaanssen, Agricultural Water Management 69, 115–133 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  32. J.W. Rouse, R.H. Haas, J.A. Schell, D.W. Deering, Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite–1 Symposium (NASA SP–351, Washington DC, 1973) [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Hansen, R. Dubayah, R. Defries, International Journal of Remote Sensing 17, 1075-1081 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  34. G.M. Foody, International Journal of Remote Sensing 17, 1317-1340 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  35. G.M. Foody, International Journal of Remote Sensing 19, 2593-2599 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Van der Meer, International Journal of Remote Sensing 16, 3189-3194 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  37. W.P. Kustas, M.C. Anderson, J.G. Alfieri, Bulletin of the American meteorological society 99(9), 1791-1812 (2018) doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0244.1 [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Rinza, D.A. Ramirez, J. Garcia, Potato Research 62(2), 109-122 (2019) doi: 10.1007/s11540-018-9400-5 [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Matese, S.F. Di Gennaro, Agriculture-BASEL 8(7), 116 (2018) doi: 10.3390/agriculture8070116 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. L. Padua, P. Marques, J. Hruska, T. Adao, Remote Sensing 10(12), 1907 (2018) doi: 10.3390/rs10121907 [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Zovko, U. Zibrat, M. Knapic, Precision Agriculture 20(2), 335-347 (2019) doi: 10.1007/s11119-019-09640-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.