Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 178, 2020
High Speed Turbomachines and Electrical Drives Conference 2020 (HSTED-2020)
Article Number 01087
Number of page(s) 4
Published online 09 July 2020
  1. R. Ramesh, D.M. Prabu, S. Magibalan, P. Senthilkumar, Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment in Automotive Industry, International Journal of ChemTech Research 10, 4, 352-358 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  2. A.C. Ahmad, I.N.M. Zin, M.K. Othman, N.H. Muhamad, The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016), Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control (HIRARC) Accidents at Power Plant, 00105, 66 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Cioni, M. Savioli, Safety at the workplace: accidents and illnesses, Work, Employment and Society 30, 5, 858-875 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. E.V. Bakiko, V.S. Serdyuk, E.V. Yakovlev, Socio-economic impact of adverse working conditions and their differentiation, Omsk Scientific Bulletin, Series Society, History, Modernity 4, 4, 149-156 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Carayon, P. Hancock, N. Leveson, I. Noy, L. Sznelwar, G. Van Hootegem, Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety – developing the conceptual framework, Ergonomics 58, 4, 548-564 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. D.A. Hofmann, M.J. Burke, D. Zohar, 100 years of occupational safety research: From basic protections and work analysis to a multilevel view of workplace safety and risk, Journal of Applied Psychology 102, 3, 375-388 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A.M. Lay, R. Saunders, M. Lifshen, F.C. Breslin, A.D. Lamontagne, E. Tompa, P.M. Smith, The relationship between occupational health and safety vulnerability and workplace injury, Safety Science 94, 85-93 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Dağdeviren, İ. Yüksel, Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management, Information Sciences 178, 6, 1717-1733 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  9. J.E. Skogdalen, J.E. Vinnem, Quantitative risk analysis offshore – Human and organizational factors, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96, 4, 468-479 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M.J. Djapan, D.P. Tadic, I.D. Macuzic, P.D. Dragojovic, A new fuzzy model for determining risk level on the workplaces in manufacturing small and medium enterprises, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 229, 5, 456-468 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Badri, B. Boudreau-Trudel, A.S. Souissi, Occupational health and safety in the industry 4.0 era: A cause for major concern?, Safety Science 109, 403-411 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. G.C. Gauchard, J.M. Mur, C. Touron, L. Benamghar, D. Dehaene, P. Perrin, N. Chau, Determinants of accident proneness: a case–control study in railway workers, Occupational Medicine 56, 3, 187-190 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. S.P. Voroshilov, N.N. Novikov, G.Z. Feinburg, Fundamentals of the methodology for assessing the level of professional risk of an employee due to the level of his professional competence, Occupational health and safety in construction 5 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. A.M. Elin, Working conditions control as a managerial influence factor, Labor Protection and Economics 4, 17, 4-8 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  15. V.S. Serdyuk, A.M. Dobrenko, O.A. Tsorina, E.V. Bakiko, S.V. Yanchij, Mathematical models for estimating production risks, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Mechanical Science and Technology Update (MSTU-2018) 1050, 012077 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E.V. Bakiko, V.S. Serdyuk, V.V. Fadeeva, Organizational and economic aspect of labor protection specialist professional competence formation, Omsk Scientific Bulletin, Series Society, History, Modernity 5, 2, 160-168 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Visser, Y.J. Pijl, R.P. Stolk, J. Neeleman, J.G.M. Rosmalen, Accident proneness, does it exist? A review and meta-analysis, Accident Analysis & Prevention 39, 3, 556-564 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.