EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 197 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 197 (2020) 08011 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 197, 2020
75th National ATI Congress – #7 Clean Energy for all (ATI 2020)
Article Number 08011
Number of page(s) 15
Section Environmental Sustainability and Renewable Energy Sources
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019708011
Published online 22 October 2020
  1. European Biogas Association (EBA), Statistical Report 2017, February 2018, available at: https://european-biogas.eu; L. Maggioni, C. Pieroni, M. Pezzaglia, “The Biogas and Biomethane Market in Italy”, Gas for Energy, No. 2, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. JRC, “End-of-waste criteria for biodegradable waste subjected to biological treatment (compost & digestate): Technical proposals”, 2014, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-researchreports/end-waste-criteria-biodegradable-waste-subjected-biological-treatmentcompost-digestate [Google Scholar]
  3. ”Digestate and compost as organic fertilisers –Risk assessment and risk management options” (reference FC/2015/0010 -SR3 under Framework Contract ENV.A.3/FRA/2015/0010), prepared by Wood with partners Peter Fisk Associates and Ramboll for the European Commission, DG Environment. [Google Scholar]
  4. DECRETO 25 febbraio 2016, https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2016/04/11/16A02786/sg [Google Scholar]
  5. EU Regulation of 2019/1009, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R1009 [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Bartocci, R. Tschentscher, R. E. Stensrød, M. Barbanera, F. Fantozzi, Molecules, 24 (9), 1657 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Tampio, T. Salo, J. Rintala, Journal of Environmental Management, 169, 293-302, (2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Saveyn, H., Eder, P., 2014. End-of-waste Criteria for Biodegradable Waste Subjected to Biological Treatment (Compost & Digestate): Technical Proposals. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. EUR 26425 EN. [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Kupper, D. Bürge, H. J. Bachmann, S. Güsewell, J. Mayer, Waste Management, 34, 5, 867-874 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Rehl, J. Müller, Life cycle assessment of biogas digestate processing technologies, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume 56, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 92-104 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yiying Jin, Ting Chen, Xin Chen, Zhixin Yu, Life-cycle assessment of energy consumption and environmental impact of an integrated food waste-based biogas plant, Applied Energy, Volume 151, 2015, Pages 227-236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bartocci, P., Zampilli, M., Liberti, F., Pistolesi, V., Massoli, S., Bidini, G., Fantozzi, F., LCA analysis of food waste co-digestion, (2020) Science of the Total Environment, 709, art. no. 136187 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Hernández, G. Masciandaro, J.I. Moreno, C. García, Changes in organic matter composition during composting of two digested sewage sludges, Waste Management, Volume 26, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1370-1376 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, X.; Liu, E.; Zhu, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Liu, X.; Dong, W. Impact of Composting Methods on Nitrogen Retention and Losses during Dairy Manure Composting. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Møller, J., Boldrin, A., & Christensen, T. H. (2009). Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution. Waste Management & Research, 27(8), 813–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X09344876 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Arable Crops, PCR, https://www.environdec.com/PCR/Detail/?Pcr=8804 [Google Scholar]
  17. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook – 2013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bouwman, A. F., L. J. M. Boumans, and N. H. Batjes, 2002, Modeling global annual N2O and NO emissions from fertilized field [Google Scholar]
  19. IPCC, 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [Google Scholar]
  20. Prahsun V., 2006. Erfassung der PO4-Austrage fur die Okobilanzierung SALCA Phosphor. Agroscope Reckenholz –Tanikon ART, 20p [Google Scholar]
  21. IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Chapter 11, https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4_11_Ch11_N2O&CO2.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. The SALCA Life Cycle Assessment Method, https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home/topics/environment-resources/life-cycle-assessment/life-cycle-assessment-methods/life-cycle-assessment- method-salca.html#2097967709 [Google Scholar]
  23. Wolfensberger U. and Dinkel F., 1997. Beurteilung Nachwachsender Rohstoffe in der Schweiz in den Jahren 1993 – 1996: Vergleichende Betrachtung von Produkten aus ausgewählten NWR und entsprechenden konventionellen Produktion bezüg-lich Umweltwirkungen und Wirtschaftlichkeit. Bern: Bundesamt für Landwirt-schaft BLW. [Google Scholar]
  24. Keller A., Rossier N. and Desaules A., 2005. Schwermetallbilanzen von Landwirtschaftpar-zellen der Nationalen Bodenbeobachtung. NABO-Nationales Bodenbeobach-tungsnetz der Schweiz. Schriftenreihe der FAL Nr. 54. ZürichReckenholz: Agroscope FAL Reckenholz. [Google Scholar]
  25. Thöni L. and Seitler E., 2004. Deposition von Luftschadstoffen in der Schweiz. Moosanaly-sen 1990-2000. Umwelt-Materialien Nr. 180. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft BUWAL. [Google Scholar]
  26. Oberholzer H.-R., Weisskopf P., Gaillard G., Weiss F. and Freiermuth R., 2006. Methode zur Beurteilung der Wirkungen landwirtschaftlicher Bewirtschaftung auf die Bo-denqualität in Ökobilanzen – SALCA-SQ. Zürich-Reckenholz: Agroscope FAL Reckenholz. Verfügbar im Internet: http://www.reckenholz.ch/doc/de/forsch/control/bilanz/publ9905.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  27. CIRCOS software, http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/tableviewer/visualize/ [Google Scholar]
  28. Mondello, G., Salomone, R., Ioppolo, G., Saija, G., Sparacia, S., Lucchetti, M.C. (2017). Comparative LCA of Alternative Scenarios for Waste Treatment: The Case of Food Waste Production by the Mass-Retail Sector. Sustainability, 8, 827 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pečkytė, J., & Baltrėnaitė, E. (2015). Assessment of heavy metals leaching from (bio)char obtained from industrial sewage sludge / Iš gamybinio nuotekų dumblo pagamintos bioanglies sunkiųjų metalų išplovimo įvertinimas. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 7(4), 399-406. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2015.811 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.