E3S Web Conf.
Volume 202, 2020The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2020)
|Number of page(s)||11|
|Section||Environmental Policy, Planning and Education|
|Published online||10 November 2020|
- M. Kamruzzaman, D. Baker, S. Washington, and G. Turrell, “Advance transit oriented development typology: Case study in brisbane, australia,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 34, pp. 54–70, (2014). [Google Scholar]
- J. Guo, F. Nakamura, Q. Li, and Y. Zhou, “Efficiency Assessment of Transit- Oriented Development by Data Envelopment Analysis: Case Study on the Den-en Toshi Line in Japan,” J. Adv. Transp., vol. 2018, (2018). [Google Scholar]
- D. Pojani and D. Stead, “Dutch planning policy: The resurgence of TOD,” Land use policy, vol. 41, pp. 357–367, (2014). [Google Scholar]
- R. Huang, A. Grigolon, M. Madureira, and M. Brussel, “Measuring transit-oriented development (TOD) network complementarity based on tod node typology,” J. Transp. Land Use, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 304–324, (2018). [Google Scholar]
- W. M. Wey, H. Zhang, and Y. J. Chang, “Alternative transit-oriented development evaluation in sustainable built environment planning,” Habitat Int., vol. 55, pp. 109–123, (2016). [Google Scholar]
- K. Credit, “Transit-oriented economic development: The impact of light rail on new business starts in the Phoenix, AZ Region, USA,” Urban Stud., vol. 55, no. 13, pp. 2838–2862, (2018). [Google Scholar]
- P. Phani Kumar, C. Ravi Sekhar, and M. Parida, “Residential dissonance in TOD neighborhoods,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 72, no. September, pp. 166–177, (2018). [Google Scholar]
- A. Nasri and L. Zhang, “The analysis of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas,” Transp. Policy, vol. 32, pp. 172–179, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Q. Shen, S. Xu, and J. Lin, “Effects of bus transit-oriented development (BTOD) on single-family property value in Seattle metropolitan area,” Urban Stud., vol. 55, no. 13, pp. 2960–2979, (2018). [Google Scholar]
- D. van Lierop, K. Maat, and A. El-Geneidy, “Talking TOD: learning about transit-oriented development in the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands,” J. Urban., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- K. C. Strong, M. E. Ozbek, A. Sharma, and D. Akalp, “Decision support framework for transit-oriented development projects,” Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 2671, no. Mcdm, pp. 51–58, (2017). [Google Scholar]
- C. D. Higgins and P. S. Kanaroglou, “A latent class method for classifying and evaluating the performance of station area transit-oriented development in the Toronto region,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 52, pp. 61–72, (2016). [Google Scholar]
- A. Ibraeva, G. H. de A. Correia, C. Silva, and A. P. Antunes, “Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 132, no. October 2019, pp. 110–130, (2020). [Google Scholar]
- R. B. Noland, M. D. Weiner, S. DiPetrillo, and A. I. Kay, “Attitudes towards transit-oriented development: Resident experiences and professional perspectives,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 60, pp. 130–140, (2017). [Google Scholar]
- L. Groenendijk, J. Rezaei, and G. Correia, “Incorporating the travellers’ experience value in assessing the quality of transit nodes: A Rotterdam case study,” Case Stud. Transp. Policy, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 564–576, (2018). [Google Scholar]
- G. J. Peek and M. Van Hagen, “Creating synergy in and around stations: Three strategies for adding value,” Transp. Res. Rec., no. 1793, pp. 1–6, (2002). [Google Scholar]
- C. Curtis, J. L. Renne, and L. Bertolini, Transit oriented development: Making it Happen. (2009). [Google Scholar]
- J. De Vos and F. Witlox, “Transportation policy as spatial planning tool; Reducing urban sprawl by increasing travel costs and clustering infrastructure and public transportation,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 33, pp. 117–125, (2013). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.