Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 202, 2020
The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2020)
Article Number 10004
Number of page(s) 9
Section Energy Conservation and Technology
Published online 10 November 2020
  1. R. Yang, W. Tang, R. Dai, and J. Zhang, J. Clean. Prod., 201 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Kusrini and R. Primadasa, Failure analysis of shaft circulating water pump (CWP) used in power plant in MATEC Web Conf., 159 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Panadare and V. K. Rathod, Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 14 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. N. H. Abdullah, S. H. Hasan, and N. R. M. Yusoff, Int. J. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1, 2 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Mannu, G. Vlahopoulou, V. Sireus, G. L. Petretto, G. Mulas, and S. Garroni, Nat. Prod. Commun., 13, 5 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Hartini, D. P. Sari, and A. A. Utami, The use of consumer behavior to identify the flow mapping of waste cooking oil: A finding from Semarang, Indonesia, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, Bali-Indonesia. [Google Scholar]
  7. L. C. Lange and A. F. M. Ferreira, Waste Manag., 61 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  8. T. R. P. Ramos, M. I. Gomes, and A. P. Barbosa-Póvoa, Waste Manag., 33, 8 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, N. A. S. Amin, and H. Mazaheri, Appl. Energy, 104 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  10. Z. L. Chung et al., Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 21 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. H. Tan, M. O. Abdullah, J. Kansedo, N. M. Mubarak, Y. S. Chan, and C. Nolasco-Hipolito, Renew. Energy, 139 (2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. S. Singh and T. N. Verma, Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 20 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. R. Gupta and V. K. Rathod, Waste Manag., 79 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Silvestre and D. M. Țîrcă, J. Clean. Prod., 208 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Melnyk, J. Oper. Manag., 21, 3 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. A. Rosen and H. A. Kishawy, Sustainability, 4, 2 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Bessou et al., Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 21, 3 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  18. The International Standards Organisation, The Int. of LCA, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Prastawa and S. Hartini, The influence of product design on environmental impacts using life cycle assessment in AIP Conference Proceedings, Bali, Indonesia (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Obaideen et al., Analysis of the human health damage and ecosystem quality impact of the palm oil plantation using the life cycle assessment approach in IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., (2019). [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Taufiqurrahmi, A. R. Mohamed, and S. Bhatia, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 22 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Valente, D. Iribarren, and J. Dufour, J. Clean. Prod., 207 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Vogtlander, VSSD, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  24. D. I. Rinawati, Sriyanto, D. Puspita Sari, and A. Cantya Prayodha, “Eco-efficiency Analysis of Furniture Product Using Life Cycle Assessment,” E3S Web Conf., 31 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Purwaningsih, C. F. Simanjuntak, and Z. F. Rosyada, Jurnal Teknik Industri, 22, 1 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. G. Vogtlander, A. E. Scheepens, N. M. P. Bocken, and D. Peck, J. Remanufacturing, 7, 1 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  27. C. M. Mah, T. Fujiwara, and C. S. Ho, J. Clean. Prod., 172 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  28. Vanessa, M. C. & Bouta, J. M., Surya University, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ecetoc, Tech. Rep. 127 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Vieira, W. H. L. Pinaya, and A. Mechelli, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 74, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Ripa, C. Buonaurio, S. Mellino, G. Fiorentino, and S. Ulgiati, Int. J. Performability Eng.,10, 4 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  32. D. F. Soraya, S. H. Gheewala, S. Bonnet, and C. Tongurai, J. Sustain. Energy Environ., 5 (2013). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.