Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2020
Innovative Technologies in Science and Education (ITSE-2020)
Article Number 18011
Number of page(s) 8
Section Environmental Education
Published online 04 December 2020
  1. C. Qiu, X. Feng, J. D. Reinhardt, J. Li, Development and psychometric testing of the Research Competency Scale for Nursing Students: An instrument design study, Nurse Education Today, 79, 198-203 (2019) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Guo, N. Saab, L. S. Post, W. Admiraal, A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures, International Journal of Educational Research, 102, (2020) doi:/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586 [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Enke, K. Kraft, J. Metternich, Competency-oriented Design of Learning Modules, Procedia CIRP, 32, 7-12 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Atiq, A. O. K. Rahmat, M. Yazmil Md. Yatim, K. N. A. Maulud, N. I. Md. Yusoff, A. A. Mutalib, The Effectiveness of basic Design Project (Cornerstone) in Students’ Competency Development, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 56-60 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Glass, J. Metternich, Method to measure competencies - a concept for development, design and validation, Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 37-42 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Thebuwana, R. Hadgraft, F. Alam, Addressing Graduate Competencies: Understanding the Contextual Factors Impacting the Engineering Discipline, Energy Procedia, 110, 359-364 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.153 [Google Scholar]
  7. I. M. Arievitch, The vision of Developmental Teaching and Learning and Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25, (2020) doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.01.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. G. K. Nithyanandam, A framework to improve the quality of teaching-learning process - A case study,Procedia Computer Science, 172, 92-97 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Farashahi, M. Tajeddin, Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations, The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 131-142 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. J. Brame, Writing Learning Objectives Using Bloom’s Taxonomy,Science Teaching Essentials, Academic Press, 16(1), 29-34 (2019)doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-814702-3.00025-1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Zhu, H. Lu, P. Qiu, K. Shi, J. Chambua, Z. Niu, Heterogeneous teaching evaluation network based offline course recommendation with graph learning and tensor factorization, Neurocomputing, 415, 84-95, (2020) doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.064. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Goodsett, Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in information literacy online learning objects, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102-106 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102163 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. N. Mokhtarian, A note on “Developing global manager’s competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method”, Expert Systems with Applications, 8, 9050-9051 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.080 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. S. Jeong, D. González-Gómez, Assessment of sustainability science education criteria in online-learning through fuzzy-operational and multi-decision analysis and professional survey, Heliyon, 6 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04706 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. A. S. Machado, T. D. R. G. Moreira, L. F. A. M. Gomes, A. M. Caldeira, D. J. Santos, A Fuzzy Logic Application in Virtual Education, Procedia Computer Science, 91, 19-26 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.037 [Google Scholar]
  16. O. Vitchenko, Y. U. Dashko, E. Tishchenko, L. Sakharova, Method of identification of extremist texts in the russian language based on the fuzzy logic, advances in intelligent systems and computing, 1095, 259-265 (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.