Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 211, 2020
The 1st JESSD Symposium: International Symposium of Earth, Energy, Environmental Science and Sustainable Development 2020
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 10
Section Sustainable Cities and Communities
Published online 25 November 2020
  1. S. Dhawan, J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 49, 5–22 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Basilaia, D. Kvavadze, Pedagog. Res. 5, 1–9 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. B. Thompson, Theory, Cult. Soc. 37, 3–28 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Rodrigues, F. Almeida, V. Figueiredo, S. L. Lopes, Comput. Educ. 136, 87–98 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Uukkivi, O. Labanova, E-learning materials, methods and tools to activate students e-learning materials, methods and tools to activate, in New learning scenarios in digitalized world: international workshop, Romania, Bucharest (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Safsouf, K. Mansouri, F. Poirier, Design of A New Scale to Measure The Learner Experience in E-Learning System, in International Conference e-Learning 2019, 301–304 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Safsouf, K. Mansouri, F. Poirier, Towards a Multidimensional Model to Study a Critical Success Factors Affecting Continuity and Success in E-Learning Systems, in Proceedings International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering, DeSE, 129–134 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Safsouf, K. Mansouri, F. Poirier, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 28–29 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. M. Terras, J. Ramsay, E. A. Boyle, E-Learning Digit. Media 12, no. 2 128–146 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Alben, Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design (1996) [Google Scholar]
  11. L. S. Miccoli, Learning English as a Foreign Language in Brazil: a Joint Investigation of Learners’ Experiences in a University Classroom (University of Toronto, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Pink, H. Horst, J. Postill, L. Hjorth, T. Lewis, J. Tacchi, Digital Ethnography Principles and Practice (SAGE, Los Angeles, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  13. P. S. Riveros, Optimal learning experience design in blended learning (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Sharpe, Learning from the Learners’ Experiences, in Learning from the Learners ’ Experiences e-learning @ greenwich Post-Conference Reflections 11–19 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Creanor, D. Gowan, C. Howells, K. Trinder, Networked Learn. 1–8 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Sharpe, G. Benfield, G. Roberts, R. Francis, High. Educ. Acad. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. F. E. S. A. Fattah, J. Educ. Pract. 6, 115–127 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Deng, W. Sun, M. Chen, Y. Yang, Libr. Hi Tech 37, 906–917 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. J. Blackmon, C. Major, Q. Rev. Distance Educ. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. F. N. Al-Fahad, Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Mike, Observing the User Experience (2012) [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Meyer, A. Schwager, Harvard Bussiness Rev. 1–13 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Chaffey, F. Ellis-Chadwick, F. Mayer, K. Johnston, Internet marketing: strategy, implementation and practice (Pearson Education, Essex, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Coloma, Development and Validation of the University Website Evaluation Scale (UWES): A Tool for Assessing Website User Experience on a University Website (2012) [Google Scholar]
  25. C. E. Osgood, G. J. Suci, P. H. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning (University of Illinois Press, Illinois, 1957) [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Bernhaupt and M. Pirker, Evaluating user experience for interactive television: Towards the development of a domain-specific user experience questionnaire (IRIT, Toulouse, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Rauschenberger, M. Schrepp, M. Perez-Cota, S. Olschner, J. Thomaschewski, Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. 2, 1 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  28. W. Y. Choo, K. Walsh, K. Chinna, N. P. Tey, J. Interpers. Violence 28, 231–253 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. R. W. Brislin, J. Cross. Cult. Psychol. 1, 185–216 (1970) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. H. B. Santoso, M. Schrepp, R. Yugo Kartono Isal, A. Y. Utomo, B. Priyogi, J. Educ. Online (2016) [Google Scholar]
  31. B. D. Rosenberg, M. A. Navarro, Semantic Differential Scaling, in The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation, B. B. Frey, Ed. Thousand Oaks (SAGE Publications, Inc., California, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  32. D. E. Beaton, C. Bombardier, F. Guillemin, M. B. Ferraz, Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 25, 3186–3191 (2000) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. E. R. Babbie, The Practice of Social Research (Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. Levy, Comput. Educ. 48, 185–204 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. W. N. Arifin, Educ. Med. J. 10, 67–76 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. J. H. Zar, Biostatistical Analysis (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Kline, The Handbook of Psychological Testing (Routledge, London and New York, 1993) [Google Scholar]
  38. R. B. dos S. Pedrosa, R. C. M. Rodrigues, K. M. Padilha, M. C. B. J. Gallani, N. M. C. Alexandre, Rev Bras Enferm [Internet] 9, 50–57 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  39. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, Analise multivariada de dados, Bookman, Porto Alegre, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  40. D. T. L. Shek, L. Yu, Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 13, 191–204 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  41. J. W. Osborne, Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis (CreateSpace Independent Publishing, Scotts Valley, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  42. A. G. Yong, S. Pearce, Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 9, 79–94 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. D. W. Straub, MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 13, 147–170 (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. D. D. Suhr, Proc. Thirty-First Annu. SAS Users Gr. Int. Conf. 200–231 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  45. A. P. Field, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018) [Google Scholar]
  46. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis (Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  47. J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory (McGraw Hill, New York, 1967) [Google Scholar]
  48. E. M. Buchanan, K. D. Valentine, S. E. Schulenberg, SAGE Reseach Methods Cases (2014) [Google Scholar]
  49. H. Kim, B. Ku, J. Y. Kim, Y. J. Park, Y. B. Park, Evidence-based Complement. Altern. Med. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  50. I. Irwansyah, P. Triputra, Soc. Sci., 11, 4585–4588 (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.