EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 214 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 214 (2020) 01009 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2020
2020 International Conference on Energy Big Data and Low-carbon Development Management (EBLDM 2020)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 8
Section Big Data Analysis Application and Energy Consumption Research
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021401009
Published online 07 December 2020
  1. Adam Smith. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, 1776. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jiang X.. Agricultural division of labor: outsource ability of production links. South China Journal of Economics, Vol. 12, pp: 96-104, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang Z. and Yi Z.. Study on the impact of agricultural production service outsourcing on rice productivity. Issues in Agricultural Economy, Vol. 36, pp: 69-76, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sun D. , Lu Y. and Tian X.. The influence of productive services on the efficiency of rice production technology in China. Chinese Rural Economy, Vol. 8, pp: 70-81, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hu Y. and Zhang Z.. The impact of agricultural machinery service on technical efficiency of wheat production. Chinese Rural Economy, Vol. 5, pp: 68-83, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang Z. , Shen H. and Liao X.. Agricultural scale management: Outsourcing from production. Chinese Rural Economy, Vol. 9, pp: 4-12, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. Duan P. Peasant household’s response to and economic effects of outsourcing in processes of agricultural production. Northwest A&F University, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu J. , Zhong F. , Xu Z. and Qiu H.. Heterogeneity and Causes of Farmer’s Production Link Outsourcing Behavior from the Perspective of Division of Labor. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, Vol. 7, pp: 4-14, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai R. and Cai S. Empirical research on the outsourcing of agricultural production links- based on the investigation of the main rice producing areas in Anhui Province. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, Vol. 4, pp: 34-42, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu W; Yan J. and Chen Z. Production process outsourcing behavior of farmers and its influencing factors：Based on the perspective of factor supply and the survey data of 1134 households. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Science), Vol. 17, pp: 8-14, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Y. and Zhang Z.. Study on difference between demand willingness and choice behavior of peasant households’ production links outsourcing——Based on empirical analysis of rice production data from Jiangsu and Jiangxi Provinces. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), Vol. 2, pp: 9-14+134, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhan J. , Zhang Y. and Zhang Z.. Does Land Fragmentation Hinder the Implementation of Agricultural Production? Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), Vol. 16, pp: 117-124+155-156, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhou D. , Yang X. and Liu Y. Agricultural production outsourcing behavior analysis. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), Vol. 16, pp: 125-129, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Qian J. , Chen Z. , Filipski M. and Wang J.. Impact of land resources and quality on farmers’ outsourcing decisions: Evidence from rice farmers in Guangxi, China. Journal of China Agricultural University, Vol. 22, pp: 164-173, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang Q. , Huo X. and Liu J.. A study on the outsourcing behaviors of apple growers: Based on the survey data of 960 households in Shanxi, Gansu and Shandong Provinces. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), Vol. 2, pp: 28-36, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lu. Q. , Zhang C. and Qiu H.. The Influence of the aging of agricultural labor force and the co-employment of non-agricultural labor force on the outsourcing of agricultural production. Problems of Agricultural Economy, Vol. 38, pp: 27-34, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang J. , Huang Z. , Chen Z.. Thomas R. and Jin L.. Stage outsourcing behavior in rice production under rapid transformation: An empirical study based on evidences from rice farmers in Jiangxi Province. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), Vol. 48, pp: 33-54, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen J. and Luo M.. The impact of farmland registration and certification on the outsourcing of rice labor-intensive production process: based on the mediating effect of agricultural machinery investment. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Vol. 33, pp: 98-111, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li L. , Zhang Y. and Zhan X.. Study on the division of agriculture and the socialization of production. Rural Economy, Vol. 2, pp: 86-91, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Luo B.. Family management in agriculture: Towards a division of labor economy. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li Y. and Gao L.. The formation and efficiency of the different types of forestland transfer. Soft Science, Vol. 28, pp: 140-144, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ran L.. Research on Liaoning farmers’ forestland circulation behavior and business efficiency in the background of collective forest tenure reform. Shenyang Agricultural University, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhu W and Zhang L.. The impact of confirming collective forest land property rights to households on the forest land circulation behavior of farmers. Resources Science, Vol. 40, pp: 1407-1417, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. The “Collective Forest Rights System Reform Monitoring” project team of the State Forestry and Prairie Bureau. Monitoring report on the reform of collective forest rights system in 2017. China Forestry Press, Beijing. Vol. 9, pp: 39-40, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hu L.. The reality of agricultural scale management in China: The mode of “Land + Service”. Issues in Agricultural Economy, Vol. 11, pp: 20-28, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  26. Barzel Y. , Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hu X. , Luo B. and Xie L.. The realization mechanism for the division of agricultural labor: Land rights subdivision and contract governance. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Vol. 30, pp: 33-42, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cao Z, Jiang S and Wang W. Behavioral ability, transaction cost and outsourcing of farmers’ production. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, Vol. 3, pp: 64-74, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhu W. and Luo B.. Behavioral ability, factor matching and scale farmer generation. Academic Research, Vol. 8, pp: 83-92+177, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Xue C. and Liu W. Effect of behavioral ability on the income gap between forestry farmers: The regression based on the number of digits. Zhejiang Social Sciences, Vol. 6, pp: 52-59+156, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shi R. and Liu W.. Research on willingness and decision of forest land circulation from the perspective of farmers’ behavior ability: Data from 50 towns in 10 counties and cities in Fujian Province. Issues of Forestry Economics, Vol. 37, pp: 23-31+101, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kong F. , Ruan H. , Liao W. and Qin K.. Impact of rural labor transfer on the farmers’ socialized service demand in the forestry: Survey data of 1407 households on production process. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, Vol. 54, pp: 132-142, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhu Z, Xu Z., Shen Y., et al. How off-farm work drives the intensity of rural households’ investment in forest management: The case from Zhejiang, China[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 5: pp. 30-43, 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.