EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 214 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 214 (2020) 02049 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2020
2020 International Conference on Energy Big Data and Low-carbon Development Management (EBLDM 2020)
Article Number 02049
Number of page(s) 7
Section Machine Learning and Energy Industry Structure Forecast Analysis
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021402049
Published online 07 December 2020
  1. Li Shoulin, Zhao Rui, Chen Lihua. Innovation performance evaluation of logistics enterprises based on grey relation analysis and TOPSIS [J]. Industrial technology and economy, 2018 37 (04): 12-21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao Yanling. Enterprise technological innovation performance evaluation based on weighted grey entropy correlation degree [J]. Technology economy and management research, 2015 (09): 43-47. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang Yong’an, Lu Ming. Evaluation of innovation efficiency of high-tech manufacturing industry and Research on the difference of factor input [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures, 2019 36 (16): 51-57. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sui Jun, Bi Kexin, Yang Chaojun, Liu Gang. Influencing factors of innovation performance of green innovation system in manufacturing industry -- Based on the perspective of technology transfer of multinational companies [J]. Science research, 2015 33 (03): 440-448. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu Mingguang, Li Gaoyang. Research on innovation performance evaluation of regional innovation system in China [J]. Modern management science, 2011 (03): 72-74. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gao Changyuan, Cheng L.u. Research on knowledge innovation performance model of high-tech virtual industry cluster based on grey relation analysis [J]. Library and information work, 2010, 54(18): 72-75. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Xiaomeng. An Empirical Study on the performance evaluation of regional technological innovation policies from the perspective of correlation and grey correlation analysis [J]. Scientific research management, 2014 35 (05): 38-43. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang Qingsong, Cheng L.i. Grey correlation analysis of enterprise technological innovation and enterprise economic performance [J]. China Science and Technology Forum, 2009 (12): 64-68. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang Likun, Liu Xiaoli. Grey correlation analysis of influencing factors of urban innovation performance [J]. Science and technology management research, 2014 34 (01): 230-233. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pei Xiao, Chen Junling. Research on technological innovation performance evaluation of high-tech industry in Hubei Province [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures, 2013 30 (21): 128-132. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang haochang, Li Lianshui. Measurement and Enlightenment of synergy between knowledge and product innovation in high-tech enterprises [J]. Scientific research, 2018 36 (10): 1889-1895. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sheng Yanwen, Ma Yanji. Evaluation and influencing factors of coupling coordination degree of regional industry, University and research innovation system [J]. Economic geography, 2017 37 (11): 10-18 + 36. [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu Sheng, Yang Xuelong. Research on collaborative development of innovation driven and marine industry agglomeration based on the grey relational analysis of coastal provinces and cities in China [J]. East China economic management, 2018 32 (02): 109-116. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan Decheng, Du Mingyue. Dynamic comprehensive evaluation of technological innovation capacity of high-tech industry based on TOPSIS grey relation projection method -- from the perspective of Beijing Tianjin Hebei integration [J]. Operation research and management, 2017 26 (07): 154-163. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li Bing, Cao Fang, Ma Yanling. Evaluation of urban innovation ability based on grey analysis [J]. Library and information, 2012 (03): 121-124. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hao Qingmin, Wu Qianyue, Ge Guofeng. Innovation and risk of Green Credit: grey relational analysis [J]. Financial theory and practice, 2016 (07): 81-85. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li Ziqiong, Li Xiangdong, Chen Xiaoxue. Research on comprehensive evaluation of innovation and transformation capacity of development zones based on grey correlation degree [J]. Macroeconomic research, 2015 (12): 115-120. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tang Decai, Tang Jiexin, Liu Hao. Comparison and evaluation of “new type” of manufacturing industry in Central China [J]. Industrial technology and economy, 2016 35 (06): 111-121. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tong Jixin, Chen Jixing, Cai Yuancheng. Study on the evaluation of the efficiency of regional scientific and technological innovation based on the grey relation analysis -- Taking Jiangsu Province as an example [J]. Scientific and technological progress and countermeasures, 2011 28 (10): 108-110. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bai Yanzhuang, Zhao Guangjie, Wang Bo, Zhang Baoyin. Grey comprehensive evaluation of technological innovation ability of enterprises [J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2006 (S1): 288-292. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang Wenxian. Research on the evaluation of regional scientific and technological innovation capacity in Guangdong Province [J]. Science and technology management research, 2016 36 (08): 75-79 + 86. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hao Xiaoyan, Liu Yuanyuan, Liang Xiaoyong. Analysis of regional technological innovation capacity and its relationship with economic growth in Inner Mongolia [J]. Scientific management research, 2010 28 (04): 21-24 + 28. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wei Hong, Li hengying, Wang Xuejun. The application of grey correlation analysis in the comprehensive evaluation of the benefits of enterprise technology center [J]. Science and technology management research, 2007 (11): 67-70. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang Fang, Wang Jingdong. Grey correlation analysis of economic development and technological progress in regional innovation in Jiangsu Province [J]. Statistics and decision making, 2005 (06): 75-76. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu Bing, Feng Hua, Wang Haiteng, Zhang Xiaowei. Research on grey correlation evaluation of innovation output and innovation environment factors -- Taking Zhongguancun as an example [J]. Academic forum, 2016 39 (01): 49-53. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang Jian, Li Pei. Evaluation on the integration degree of collaborative innovation of modern service industry in Beijing and Tianjin: grey relational analysis [J]. Modern finance and Economics (Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics), 2016 36 (01): 13-21. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jia Chunguang, Cheng Junmo, Tan Xiaoyu. Dynamic evaluation and spatial difference analysis of regional science and technology innovation capacity in Shandong Province [J]. Science and technology management research, 2020 40 (02): 106-114. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li Zheng, Zhou Lun. Grey relation comprehensive evaluation method of enterprise technological innovation capability based on AHP [J]. East China economic management, 2008 (09): 106-109. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang Jinle, Yi Chenchen, Ge Jing. Research on Development Strategies of aerospace manufacturing industry in Western China based on Entropy Weight Grey Correlation Model [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures, 2015 32 (17): 77-81. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yao Yanting, Chen Wanming. Research on low-carbon agriculture and technological innovation based on grey correlation model [J]. Statistics and decision making, 2014 (14): 93-96. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang Mengyuan, Yu Yiyong. Research on decision-making model of sustainable innovation opportunity for innovative enterprises [J]. Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and economics, 2018 34 (12): 96-105. [Google Scholar]
  32. You Daming, Huang Xizi. Selection and evaluation of breakthrough technological innovation partners [J]. Systems engineering, 2014 32 (03): 99-103. [Google Scholar]
  33. Qian Mingxia. Analysis of the factors related to the development of China’s high-tech industry and independent innovation [J]. Journal of Southeast University (PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2008 (03): 34-38 + 127. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pang Qinghua. Comprehensive evaluation model of enterprise technological innovation capability based on grey theory [J]. Science and technology management research, 2007 (12): 113-115 + 118. [Google Scholar]
  35. Qi yanru, Liu Yun, Hou Yuanyuan. Comparative study on regional innovation capability based on analysis of patent influencing factors [J]. China management science, 2013, 21 (S2): 594-599. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang Fang, Tang Pengzhi, Zhou Jun. empirical research on technological innovation of high tech industry in Jiangxi Province [J]. Enterprise economy, 2009 (08): 111-113. [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang Han, Zhu Yubing. An Empirical Study on the influencing factors of technological innovation output capacity in Guangxi Based on the grey relational analysis model [J]. Guangxi Social Sciences, 2013 (06): 22-24. [Google Scholar]
  38. Qiu Dongfang. Grey correlation analysis of Macro Influencing Factors of agricultural R & D intensity in China [J]. East China economic management, 2013 27 (03): 29-34. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang Qingyu, Li Ming. An empirical measurement of regional independent innovation capacity based on Grey Relational Analysis -- Taking Chongqing as an example [J]. Soft science, 2011 25 (01): 91-94 + 101. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang Zhibo. Evaluation of technological innovation ability of enterprises based on AHP grey relational model [J]. Statistics and decision, 2013 (04): 51-53. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li Meijuan, Chen Guohong, Chen Guolong. Research on the evaluation of industrial technological innovation ability based on the grey correlation degree [J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and economics, 2008 (06): 51-57. [Google Scholar]
  42. Jing Xueqing. Grey correlation analysis of technological innovation ability and economic growth in Shanghai [J]. Modern management science, 2013 (01): 6-9. [Google Scholar]
  43. Changyumiao, changchangchangchun. Correlation effect of Jiangsu’s marine and land industries and Countermeasures for coordinated development [J]. Regional research and development, 2012 31 (04): 34-36 + 46. [Google Scholar]
  44. Huang Lucheng, Zhang Hongcai. Analysis on the relationship between manufacturing competitiveness and technological innovation capacity in Beijing [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures, 2005 (10): 50-51. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhao Jingfeng, Wang Yanrong. Empirical Study on the relationship between innovation culture characteristics and entrepreneurship performance of high-tech enterprises [J]. Management world, 2011 (12): 184-185. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang Zhangbao, Li Lei. Grey correlation analysis of technological innovation ability and industrial competitiveness of China’s manufacturing industry [J]. Science and technology management, 2007 (07): 38-42. [Google Scholar]
  47. Song Wei, Cao Zhendong, Peng Xiaobao. Fuzzy evaluation of regional independent innovation ability based on grey correlation degree [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2010 12 (03): 66-70. [Google Scholar]
  48. Li Rui, Zhou Ping. Government behavior and independent innovation: an analysis framework based on the perspective of supply and demand [J]. China Science and Technology Forum, 2012 (03): 11-17. [Google Scholar]
  49. Li Bozhou, Yin Shi. Research on the multi-attribute decisionmaking model of manufacturing enterprise partner selection based on consistency -- cooperative innovation perspective [J]. Operations research and management, 2018 27 (06): 6-13. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhu Minghao, dou shuihai, Jia J.i. Analysis of the effect of China’s automobile industry technology innovation policy [J]. Scientific research management, 2017 38 (07): 26-36. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.