EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 219 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 219 (2020) 01006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 219, 2020
Mathematical Models and Methods of the Analysis and Optimal Synthesis of the Developing Pipeline and Hydraulic Systems 2020
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 6
Section Methods of Analysis of Pipeline Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021901006
Published online 15 December 2020
  1. E. Yudovina, E. Pashenkova, L. Korelstein, In: Piping systems of Energetics: Methodical and applied problems of mathematical simulation, 438 (Novosibirsk, Nauka, 2015) [in Russian] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Babenko, E. Yudovina, L. Korelstein, T. Gartman, Program products and systems, 1, 141 (2013) [in Russian] [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Yudovina, S. Lisin, V. Tarasevich, A. Lee, A. Moroz, In: Piping systems of Energetics: Mathematical and computer technologies of intellectualization, 353 (Novosibirsk, Nauka, 2017) [in Russian] [Google Scholar]
  4. J.A. Fox, Hydraulic Analysis of Unsteady Flow in Pipe Networks (London, 1977) [Google Scholar]
  5. E.B. Wylie, V.L. Streeter, Fluid transients (McGraw-Hill International Book Company, New York, USA, 1978) [Google Scholar]
  6. M.H. Chaudhry, Applied Hydraulic Transients. 3rd Edition (Springer, 2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Hameyer. Electrical Machines 1. Basics, Design, Function, Operation (IEM RWTH, 2001) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Marchal, G. Flesch, P. Suter, In: Proceedings of the Int. Symp. on Waterhammer in Pumped Storage Projects, ASME, Chicago, USA, 67 (1965) [Google Scholar]
  9. Suter, P., Sulzer Technical Review Research, 1966, 45 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. ANSI-HI 1-1-1.2-2014. Rotodynamic Centrifugal Pumps for Nomenclature and Definitions (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Donsky, J. Basic Engineering, December, 685 (1961) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R.T. Knapp, Trans.,Amer. Soc. of Mech. Engrs., 59, 683 (1937) [Google Scholar]
  13. W.M. Swanson, Trans. Amer. Soc. of Mech. Engrs., 75, 819 (1953) [Google Scholar]
  14. C.P. Kittredge, ASME Journal of Basic Engineering, 78, 6, 1307 (1956) [Google Scholar]
  15. R.J. Brown, D.C. Rogers, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 102, 4, 807 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A.R.D. Thorley, A. Chaudry, In: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. On Pressure Surges, BHRA, Cranfield, Beds, UK, 461 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Ayder, C. Ozgur, A.N. Ilikan, L. Kavurmacioglu, M. Sen, K. Kirkkopru, In: Proc. of the ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting (FEDSM2009), Vail USA, August 2-6 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Giljen, M. Nedeljković, Y. Cheng, 28th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems (2016) [Google Scholar]
  19. C.S. Martin, ASME/FED, 6, 1 (1983) [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Trey, D. Trygve, D.C. Rogers, In: Proc. the ASME 2020 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference PVP2020 July 19-24 (Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  21. W. Wan, W. Huang, J. Mech. Science and Technology, 25(10), 2583 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.