Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 220, 2020
Sustainable Energy Systems: Innovative Perspectives (SES-2020)
Article Number 01098
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202022001098
Published online 19 February 2021
  1. (BIS), B. of I. S. (1970). IS 383: 1970 Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates From Natural Sources for Concrete. Indian Standards, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexandridou, C., Angelopoulos, G. N., & Coutelieris, F. A. Mechanical and durability performance of concrete produced with recycled aggregates from Greek construction and demolition waste plants, Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 745–757, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrew Alcorn. Embodied energy and CO2 coefficientd for NewZealand building materials. Centre for Building Performance Research, Victoria University of Wellington, November, 4–16, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ardente, F., Beccali, M., Cellura, M., & Mistretta, M. Building energy performance: A LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board. Energy and Buildings, 40, 1–10, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  5. Beltrán, M., Barbudo, A., Agrela, F., P. Galvin, A., & Jiménez J. R. Effect of cement addition on the properties of recycled concretes to reach control concretes strengths. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 124–133, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  6. Brand, A. S., Roesler, J. R., & Salas, A. Initial moisture and mixing effects on higher quality recycled coarse aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 79, 83–89, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. Bui, N. K., Satomi, T., & Takahashi, H. Mechanical properties of concrete containing 100% treated coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 163, 496–507, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. Bureau of Indian Standard(BIS). IS: 8112–1989, Specification for 43 grade Ordinary Portland Cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 17, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). IS: 2386 (Part I) 1963 Indian Method of test for aggregate for concrete. Part I Particle size and shape. Indian Standards, (Reaffirmed 2002), (1963). [Google Scholar]
  10. Cabeza, L. F., Barreneche, C., Miró L., Morera, J. M., Bartolí E., & Inés Fernández A. Low carbon and low embodied energy materials in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23, 536–542, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. Christoforou, E., Kylili, A., Fokaides, P. A., & Ioannou, I. Cradle to site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of adobe bricks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 443–452, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. Christoforou, E., Kylili, A., Fokaides, P., & Ioannou, I. Cradle to site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of adobe bricks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. Council, O. F. T. H. E. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council. Fundamental Texts On European Private Law, 3–30, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  14. D, P. C. Agenda 21 on sustainable construction in developing countries. CIB (International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction)., 120, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  15. Dimitriou, G., Savva, P., & Petrou, M. F. Enhancing mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 228–235, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  16. Etxeberria, M., Vázquez E., Mari, A., & Barra Bizinotto, M. Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregates and production process on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 37, 735–742, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  17. Evangelista, L., & de Brito, J. Mechanical behaviour of concrete made with fine recycled concrete aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, 29(5), 397–401, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  18. Evangelista, L., & de Brito, J. Concrete with fine recycled aggregates: a review. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 18(2), 129–172, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. Gesoglu, M., Güneyisi E., Oz, H., Taha, I., & Yasemin, M. T. Failure characteristics of selfcompacting concretes made with recycled aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 98, 334–344, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Hammond, G., & Jones, C. A BSRIA Guide. Embodied Carbon: The Inventory of Carbon and Energy. University of Bath, UK. Ice, 136, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  21. Hansen, T. (1992). Recycling of demolished concrete and masonry: report of. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hossain, M. U., Poon, C. S., Lo, I. M. C., & Cheng, J. C. P. Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 67–77, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  23. Hossain, Y., & Marsik, T. Conducting life cycle assessments (LCAs) to determine carbon payback: A case study of a highly energy-efficient house in rural Alaska. Energies, 12(9), (2019). [Google Scholar]
  24. Hu, M., Weir, J. D., & Wu, T. Decentralized operation strategies for an integrated building energy system using a memetic algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 217(1), 185–197, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  25. Indian Standards. IS 13311-2 (1992): Method of non-destructive testing of concret-methods of test, Part 2: Rebound hammer. Indian Standards, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  26. IPCC, 2001: Climate change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Houghton, J.T. Ding, Y. Griggs, D.J. Noguer, M. Linden, P.J. van der Dai, X. Maskell, K. Johnson, C.A.]. Cambridge University Press, 94, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  27. IS: 4031 (Part 6). Methods Of Physical Tests For Hydraulic Cement Part 6 Determination Of Compressive Strength Of Hydraulic Cement Other Than Masonry Cement (First Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1–3, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  28. IS 4031Part IV. Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. Part IVDetermination of consistency of standard cement paste. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, Reaffirmed in 2005, (1988). [Google Scholar]
  29. IS 4031Part V. Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. Part VDetermination of initial and final setting times. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, Reaffirmed in 2005, (1988). [Google Scholar]
  30. IS 456. Concrete, Plain and Reinforced. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Dehli, 1–114, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  31. IS 516:2014. Method of Tests for Strength of Concrete. IS: 516 1959 (Reaffirmed 2004), New Delhi, India, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  32. Kong, D., Lei, T., Zheng, J., Ma, C., Jiang, J., & Jiang, J. Effect and mechanism of surface-coating pozzalanics materials around aggregate on properties and ITZ microstructure of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 24(5), 701–708, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  33. Kou, S. C., Poon, C. S., & Agrela, F. Comparisons of natural and recycled aggregate concretes prepared with the addition of different mineral admixtures. Cement & Concrete Composites CEMENT CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 33, 788–795, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  34. Kurad, R., Silvestre, J., Brito, J., & Ahmed, H. Effect of incorporation of high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash on the strength and global warming potential of concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 485–502, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  35. Limbachiya, M. C., Marrocchino, E., & Koulouris, A. Chemical-mineralogical characterisation of coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Waste Management, 27(2), 201–208, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  36. Lotfi, S., Deja, J., Rem, P., Mróz R., Van Roekel, E., & Van Der Stelt, H. Mechanical recycling of EOL concrete into high-grade aggregates. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 87, 117–125, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  37. McGinnis, M. J., Davis, M., de la Rosa, A., Weldon, B. D., & Kurama, Y. C. Strength and stiffness of concrete with recycled concrete aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 154, 258–269, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  38. Morgan, M. R. Climate change 2001. In Weather (Vol. 59, Issue 8), (2004). [Google Scholar]
  39. Ortiz-rodriguez, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 28–39, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  40. Pešta, J., Pavlů, T., Fortová, K., & Koĉí, V. Sustainable masonry made from recycled aggregates: LCA case study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4), (2020). [Google Scholar]
  41. Poon, C. S., Shui, Z. H., Lam, L., Fok, H., & Kou, S. C. Influence of moisture states of natural and recycled aggregates on the slump and compressive strength of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(1), 31–36, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  42. Praseeda, K., Reddy, B., & Mani, M. Embodied energy assessment of building materials in India using process and input–output analysis. Energy and Buildings, 86, 677–686, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  43. Sharma, A., Saxena, A., Sethi, M., Shree, V., & Varun. Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 871–875, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  44. Silva, R. V., De Brito, J., & Dhir, R. K. Properties and composition of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste suitable for concrete production. Construction and Building Materials, 65, 201–217, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  45. STANDARDS, Burea. O. I. Handbook on Concrete Mix Design, (1982). [Google Scholar]
  46. Tam, V. W. Y., & Tam, C. M. Assessment of durability of recycled aggregate concrete produced by two-stage mixing approach. Journal of Materials Science, 42(10), 3592–3602, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  47. Tam, V. W. Y., & Tam, C. M. Diversifying twostage mixing approach (TSMA) for recycled aggregate concrete: TSMAs and TSMAsc. Construction and Building Materials, 22(10), 2068–2077, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  48. United Nation Environment Programme. Buildings and Climate Change: Current Status , Challenges and Opportunities. DG Environment News Alert Dervice, 71, 1, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  49. Venkatarama Reddy, B. V., & Jagadish, K. S. Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energy and Buildings, 35(2), 129–137, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  50. Verian, K. P., Ashraf, W., & Cao, Y. Properties of recycled concrete aggregate and their influence in new concrete production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133 (February), 30–49, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  51. Vźquez, E. (Professor), & RILEM Technical Committee 217-PRE. Progress of recycling in the built environment: final report of the RILEM Technical Committee 217-PRE, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  52. Xuan, D., Zhan, B., & Poon, C. S. Assessment of mechanical properties of concrete incorporating carbonated recycled concrete aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, 65, 67–74, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  53. Zabalza Bribián, I., Aranda Usón, A., & Scarpellini, S. Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Building and Environment, 44(12), 2510–2520, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  54. Zaharieva, R., Buyle-Bodin, F., Skoczylas, F., & Wirquin, E. Assessment of the surface permeation properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 25(2), 223–232, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhan, B. J., Xuan, D. X., Zeng, W., & Poon, C. S. Carbonation treatment of recycled concrete aggregate: Effect on transport properties and steel corrosion of recycled aggregate concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 104 (July), 103360, (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.