EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 224 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 224 (2020) 04038 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 224, 2020
Topical Problems of Agriculture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (TPACEE 2020)
Article Number 04038
Number of page(s) 21
Section Agriculture and Bioscience
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202022404038
Published online 23 December 2020
  1. Singh R K, Murty H R, Gupta S K, Dikshit A K 2012 An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies Ecological Indicators 15(1) 281–99 [Google Scholar]
  2. Patton M Q 2012 Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications) [Google Scholar]
  3. Aubin J, Donnars C, Supkova M, Dorin B, Gaillard G, Garcia F et al 2013 N Food system sustainability: Insights from duALIne ed C Esnouf, M Russel and N Bricas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) chapter “A critical panorama of methods used to assess food sustainability” pp 198–232 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Popov E V, Veretennikova A Y, Omonov Z K 2017 A social innovation impact assessment matrix Digest Finance 22(4) 365–78 https://doi.org/10.24891/re.15.9.1752 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dhondt S, Van de Ven H, Ziauberyte R, Van der Torre W, Cressey P, Kaderabkova A et al 2016 Ex-ante impact assessment & value network analysis for SI. Gelsenkirchen (Institute for Work and Technology Available) at: https://repository.tudelft.nl/view/tno/uuid%3A843a0c44-4e02-4213-9ff5b03b0ff081d6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Wiek A, Kay B, Forrest N 2017 Urban sustainability transitions ed F De Niki, D Loorbach, V Castán Broto and L Coenen (New York: Taylor & Francis) chapter 14 “Worth the trouble?! An evaluative scheme for urban sustainability transition labs (USTLs) and an application to the USTL in Phoenix, Arizona” pp 227–56 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Luederitz C, Schäpke N, Wiek A, Lang D J, Bergmann M, Bos J J et al 2017 Learning through evaluation: A tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments J. of Cleaner Production 169 61-76 Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peterson M 2006 The precautionary principle is incoherent Risk Analysis 26(3) 595–601 Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00781.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A 2010 Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, social justice (Washington: Earthscan) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Naudet J, Delarue J, Bernard T 2012 Impact evaluations: A tool for accountability? Lessons from experience in AFD J. of Development Effectiveness 20(4) 27–48 Available at: doi:10.3917/edd.264.0027. [Google Scholar]
  11. Howarth R B, Norgaard R B 2013 Intergenerational Transfers and the Social Discount Rate Environmental and Resource Economics 3(4) 337-58 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Portney P R, Weyant J P 1999 Discounting and intergenerational equity Modern Economy 10(11) [Google Scholar]
  13. Mayne J 2011 Evaluating the complex: Attribution, contribution, and beyond ed K Forss, M Marra and R Schwartz (Piscataway: Transaction Press) chapter “Contribution analysis: Addressing cause and effect” [Google Scholar]
  14. Temple L, Barret D, Blundo Canto G, Dabat M H, Devaux-Spatarakis A, Faure G, Triomphe B 2018 Assessing impacts of agricultural research for development: A systemic model focusing on outcomes Research Evaluation 27(2) 157–170 Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy005. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fraser D G E, Dougill A J, Mabee W E, Reed M, McAlpine P 2005 Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory process for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management J. of Environmental Management 78 114-27 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Abi-Nader J, Ayson A, Harris K, Herrera H, Eddins D, Habib D, Villanueva L 2009 Whole measures for community food systems: Values-based planning and evaluation (Burlington: Center for Whole Communities) [Google Scholar]
  17. Landert J, Schader C, Moschitz H, Stolze M 2017 A holistic sustainability assessment method for urban food system governance Sustainability 9(4) 490 Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040490. [Google Scholar]
  18. Carlsson L, Callaghan E, Morley A, Broman G 2017 Food system sustainability across scales: A proposed local-to-global approach to community planning and assessment Sustainability 9(6) 1061 [Google Scholar]
  19. Douthwaite B, Schulz S, Olanrewaju A S, Ellis-Jones J 2007 Impact pathway evaluation of an integrated Striga hermonthica control project in northern Nigeria Agricultural Systems 92(1-3) 201–22 Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.03.007. [Google Scholar]
  20. Proietti C, Wittine D, Alvarez S, Parker M, Schulte-Geldermann E, Stoian D, Thiele G 2015 Co-constructing impact pathways with stakeholders for results-based management CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Banana Brief n°1 [Google Scholar]
  21. Beshelev S D, Gurvich S D 1980 Mathematical and statistical methods of expert assessments Statistics 263 [Google Scholar]
  22. Saati T, Kerns K 1991 Analytical planning Organization of systems Radio and communication 224 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gmurman V E 2003 Probability theory and mathematical statistics Higher school 479 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gorokhova T, et al 2020 E3S Web of Conferences 164 09034 doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202016409034 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. Trikoz E N 2018 Rusin 51(1) 113-133 doi:10.17223/18572685/51/9 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.