E3S Web Conf.
Volume 227, 2021Annual International Scientific Conference on Geoinformatics – GI 2021: “Supporting sustainable development by GIST”
|Number of page(s)||8|
|Section||Geoinformatics in Geodetic Operations|
|Published online||06 January 2021|
- A. R. Yarmukhamedov. The morphostructure of the median Tien Shan and its relationship with seismicity. Tashkent: Fan, 163 (1988) (In Russian). https://www.geo-fund.am/files/library/1/15247392644395.pdf [Google Scholar]
- T. Rashidov, L. Plotnikova and S. Khakimova. Seismic hazard and building vulnerability in Uzbekistan // in Seismic Hazard and Building Vulnerability in PostSoviet Central Asian Republics. edited by S.A. King, Vitaly I. Khalturin, B.E. Tucker. NATO ASI series. Vol.52. (1999) [Google Scholar]
- D. Giardini, G. Grünthal, K. M. Shedlock, and P. Zhang. The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map. In: Lee, W., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. and Kisslinger, C. (eds.): International Handbook of Earthquake & Engineering Seismology, International Geophysics Series 81 B, Academic Press, Amsterdam, 1233-1239 (2003) http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/GSHAP [Google Scholar]
- T. U. Artikov, R. S. Ibragimov, T. L. Ibragimova, K. I. Kuchkarov, M. A. Mirzaev. Quantitative assessment of seismic hazard for the territory of Uzbekistan according to the estimated maximum ground oscillation rates and their spectral amplitudes. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 9 (4), 1173–1188 (2018) doi: 10.5800/GT‐2018‐9‐4‐0389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. L. Hamidov. Identification of morphokinetic indicators of modern geodynamics of western Tiang Shan // Modern geodynamics of Central Asia and dangerous natural processes: quantitative research results: Materials of the All-Russian meeting and youth school on modern geodynamics (Irkutsk, September 23–29, 2012). In 2-ht. Irkutsk: IZSORAN, T. 2. 211 (2012) www.crust.irk.ru/images/upload/newsfond143/299.pdf [Google Scholar]
- M. Juliev, A. Pulatov, J. Hübl. Natural hazards in mountain regions of Uzbekistan: A review of mass movement processes in Tashkent province. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Vol. 8, Issue 2, February (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. P. Wolf, and D. C. Ghilani. Adjustment computations: statistics and least squares in surveying and GIS. Wiley, New York, 347 (1997) [Google Scholar]
- I. Deniz, & H. Ozener. Estimation of strain accumulation of densification network in Northern Marmara Region, Turkey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10(10), 2135–2143 (2010) https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-2135-2010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Dermanis. A method for the determination of crustal deformation parameters and their accuracy from distances. J. Geod. Soc. Japan, 40, 17-32 (1994) [Google Scholar]
- O.C. Zienkiewicz, R.L. Taylor, and J.Z. Zhu. The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals. 6th edition, Butterworth-Heinemann. 752 (2005) [Google Scholar]
- A.O. Agibalov, V.A. Zaytsev, A.A. Sentsov, A.S. Devyatkina. Assessment of the influence of modern crustal movements and the recently activated Precambrian structural plan on the relief of the Lake Ladoga region (the southeastern Baltic Shield). Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 8 (4), 791–807 (2017) doi: 10.5800/GT-2017-8-40317 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. D. Dumitru, M. Plopeanu, and D. Badea. Comparative Study Regarding the Methods of Interpolation. In: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference of Geodesy & Geomatics Engineering (GENG ’13), 32-37 (2013) http://www.wseas.us/elibrary/conferences/2013/Antalya/GENG/GENG-00.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- D. Fazilova, H. Magdiev. Comparative study of interpolation methods in development of local geoid. International Journal of Geoinformatics, V.14, №1. 29–33 (2018) http://journals.sfu.ca/ijg/index.php/journal/article/view/1114/599 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.