Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 227, 2021
Annual International Scientific Conference on Geoinformatics – GI 2021: “Supporting sustainable development by GIST”
Article Number 06001
Number of page(s) 13
Section Professional and Further Education in the Field of Geoinformatics
Published online 06 January 2021
  1. European Commision, “Digital technologies actions in response to coronavirus pandemic” [Online]. Available: [Accessed June 28 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Darwish, K.I. Lakhtaria, The Impact of the New Web 2.0 Technologies in Communication, Development, and Revolutions of Societies, Journal of advances in information technology 2, 4, 204-216 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Thielmann, L. Van der Velden, F. Fischer, R. Vogler, Dwelling in the Web: Towards a Googlization of Space, HIIG Discussion Paper Series 2012, 03 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  4. A.S. Helal, E. Moore, B. Ramachandran, Drishti: An Integrated Navigation System for Visually Impaired and Disabled, 2nd IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, Orlando, March 14–17 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  5. D.R. Montello, S.M. Freundschuh, Cognition of Geographic Information (A Research Agenda for Geographic Information Science, edited by R. B. McMaster and E. L. Usery, 61–91. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Panek, From mental maps to geoparticipation, The Cartographic Journal 53, 4, 300-307 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Hennig, S., R. Vogler, I. Gryl, Spatial Education for Different User Groups as a Prerequisite for Creating a Spatially Enabled Society and Leveraging SDI, International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructre Research 8, 2013, 98-127 (2013) . [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Nielsen, “Digital divide: the 3 stages” [Online]. Available: [Accessed Dec. 5 2019]. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Van Dijk, The evolution of the digital divide the digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage, Digital Enlightenment Yearbook 2012, 57-75 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Bartling B. Resch, A. Eitzinger, L. Zurita-Arthos, A multi-national human– computer interaction evaluation of the public participatory GIS GeoCitizen, GI_Forum 2019, 1, 18-39 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Hennig, R. Vogler, YouthMap 5020! What should youth-centred web maps look like?, GI_Forum 2014, 1, 285-294, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. International perspectives on teaching and learning with GIS in secondary schools (Edited by A. Milson, A. Demirci, J. Kerski. New York: Springer, 2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Using geoinformation in European geography education (Edited by K. Donert. Rome: International Geographic Union, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Gryl, T. Jekel, Re-centring Geoinformation in Secondary Education: Toward a Spatial Citizenship Approach, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 47, 1, 18-28 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. F.J. Fernandez-Cruz, M.J. Fernandez-Diaz, Teachers Generation Z and their Digital Skills. Comunicar, 24, 46, 97-105 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R.W. Marx, J.S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, A. Palincsar, Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning, Educational Psychologist 26, 369–398 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Delattre “Mapping the Thien Sgan mountains” [Online]. Available: [Accessed June 28 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  18. Learning to Think Spatially (Edited by National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Stuart Sinton, S.W. Bednarz, P. Gersmehl, R.A. Kolvoord, D.H. Uttal, The People’s Guide to Spatial Thinking, National Council for Geographic Education (2013). [Google Scholar]
  20. J.B. Harley, Deconstructing the Map, Cartographica 26, 2, 1-20 (1989). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J.W. Crampton, Maps as Social Constructions: Power, Communication and Visualization, Progress in Human Geography 25, 2, 235-352 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Pickles, Ground Truth 1995–2005, Transactions in GIS 10, 5, 763-772 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. B. Werlen, Society action and space: an alternative human geography (London & New York: Routledge, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Elwood, K. Mitchell, Another Politics Is Possible: Neogeographies, Visual Spatial Tactics, and Political Formation, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 48, 4, 275-292 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. W.L. Bennett, C. Wells, A. Rank, Young citizens and civic learning: two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age, Citizenship Studies 13, 2, 105-120(2009). [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Vogler, S. Hennig, T. Jekel, K. Donert (2012). Towards a concept of spatially enabled learning. In T. Jekel, A. Car, J. Strobl, & G. Griesebner (Eds.), GI_Forum 2012: Geovizualisation, Society and Learning, 204-211. Berlin: Wichmann. [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Vogler, T. Jekel, E. Killingseder, Using the Geographies of Learning. An Exploratory Categorization for Spatially Enabled Learning, GI_Forum 2018, 2, 181-192(2018). [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Paivio, Mental Representations: A dual coding approach (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Wood, The Power of Maps (London: Routledge, 1993). [Google Scholar]
  30. R. Vogler, S. Hennig, M. Lindner-Fally, Shrinking technical Challenges – Zur strukturierten Erstellung digitaler Karten im Unterricht, GW-Unterricht 137, 1, 49-60(2015). [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Vockner, R. Vogler, C. Atzl, M. Mittlböck, THE4BEES – Energieverständnis durch smarte Gebäude, AGIT – Journal für Angewandte Geoinformatik, 2018, 4, 348-353(2018). [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Hennig, L. Abad, D. Hölbling, Geo citizen science and the role of participatory design in the field of geomorphology, InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories: Proceedings of the International conference 26, 1, 116–126 (Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Hennig, R. Vogler, User-Centred Map Applications Through Participatory Design. Experiences Gained During the ‘YouthMap 5020’ Project, The Cartographic Journal 53, 3, 213-229(2016). [Google Scholar]
  34. N. De Luca, N. Ferber, H. Atteneder, T. Jekel, Feminist and Queer Approaches to Education for Spatial Citizenship, GI_Forum 2015, 1, 272-282(2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Kerski, Geo‐awareness, Geo‐enablement, Geotechnologies, Citizen Science, and Storytelling: Geography on the World Stage, Geography Compass 9, 14-26 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  36. D.Z. Sui, S. Elwood, M.F. Goodchild, Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge (Berlin: Springer, 2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Keller, A. Oberrauch, Can innovative learning settings support Education for Sustainable Development? – Teenagers from Northern and Southern Tyrol perform research on quality of life, Standards and Research in Geography Education. Current Trends and International Issues. (Edited by D. Schmeinck, & J. Lidstone, J., Berlin: Mensch und Buch Verlag, 81-92, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  38. R. Prüller, J. Scholz, C. Strauß, T. Achleitner, Teaching GIS in Central Asia, Vermessung & Geoinformation 1, 174-178 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  39. J. Lave, E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Cambridge: Cambrige University Press, 1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. T.D. Sadler, Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice, Studies in Science Education 45, 1, 1-42(2009). [Google Scholar]
  41. E.G. Clary, M. Snyder, R.D. Ridgr, J. Copeland, A.A. Stukas, J. Haugen P. Miene, Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 6, 1516-1530(1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. T.F. Dapp, The digital society. New ways to more transparency, participation and innovation (Frankfurt: Deutsche Bank Research, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  43. A. Martin, Digital literacy and the “Digital Society”, Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices (Edited by C. Lankshear, M. Knobel, M. Peters, New York, Oxford: Peter Lang, 151-176, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Enemark, A. Rajabifard, Spatially Enabled Society, Geoforum Perspektiv – Tidsskrift for Geografisk Information 20, 3-16 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Koller, T. Jekel, R. Vogler, RECC Geographie und Wirtschaftskunde – Geomedien, GW Unterricht 151, 2, 66-68(2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. NCVO Knowhow “How to engage with young people in your community” [Online]. Available: [Accessed June 28 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  47. Worldbank “Uzbekistan Country Profil” [Online]. Available: [Accessed June 28 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Hennig, A. Nazakulova, Benefits and challenges of eLearning in Central Asia, International Journal of Geoinformatics 15, 4, 43-51(2019). [Google Scholar]
  49. GPS Global Partership “Education Sector Plan (ESP) of Uzebekistan 2019-2023” [Online]. Available: [Accessed June 28 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  50. O. Akbarov, B. Markus, A. Podor, Development of Advanced Education in Geoinformatics for Enabling Sustainable Development in Uzbekistan (Proceedings FIG Congress, 1-15, 2014). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.