Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2021
International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2020)
Article Number 01021
Number of page(s) 9
Section Agricultural Economic
Published online 25 January 2021
  1. F. Merhi, J. Auger, F. Rendu, and B. Bauvois. Allium compounds, dipropyl and dimethyl thiosulfinates as antiproliferative and differentiating agents of human acute myeloid leukemia cell lines. Abstract Biologics. Dec 2(4): 885-95. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  2. Statistic Center Agency. Harvest area, Production, and Yield of Horticulture Central Sulawesi 2016. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. HSP. Rahayu., Yorobe, JM., Quicoy, CB. Profitability of Local Shallot Farms under Different Watering Systems in Central Sulawesi Indonesia. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research. 7 (1). (2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. R.S. Basuki. Technical and Economic feasiblity on True Seed of Shallot and Traditional Seed on Shallot. Horticulture Journal. 19 (3): 5-8. (2009). [Google Scholar]
  5. K, Davis,. E, Nkonya,. E. Kato., DA Mekonmen., M Odendo., R Miiro., J Nkuba. Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East Africa. Discussion Paper. International Food Policy Research Institute. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  6. C Ragasa., J, Ulimwengu., Randriamamonjay., T Badibagan. Agricultural Extension: Evidence from Democratic Republik of Congo. The Journal of Agrcultural Education and Extension. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. A.F.G.J. Anderson., R Birner., K Deininger. Promises and Realies of Community based Agricultural Extension. Discussion Paper. International Food Policy Research Institute. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. B Swanson., and R Rajalahti. Strengthening Agricultural Extension and Advisory Systems: Procedures for Assessing, Transforming, and Evaluating Extension Systems. ARD Discussion Paper 20. Washington, DC: World Bank. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Mardikanto, P. Soebianto. Community empowerment in the perspective of public policy. Bandung (Indonesia): Alfabeta. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. SJ Jeong and SJ Choi. Agricultural literacy in the context of agricultural education in South Korea: using hierarchical linear modeling, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2020.1748670. 20 p. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. R Hendayana,. Perception and Adoption. IAARD Press. Jakarta 67 p. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. F Landini, and M Beramendi. Construction and validation of a psychometric scale to assess extension agents’ beliefs about extension and innovation. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2019.1643748. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. L.S. Mulijanti, A. Sinaga. Effectiveness of jajar legowo planting technology assistance on the change of attitude and knowledge of farmers in Sumedang Regency, West Java Effectiveness of jajar legowo planting technology assistance on the change of attitude and knowledge of farmers in Sumedang Regency, West Java [Internet]. [cited 22 Februari 2017]. Available from: (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. A.Y. Fadwiwati. The Effect of High Yield Varieties toward Efficiency, Income, and Corn Distribution Income in Gorontalo. [dissertation]. Bogor Agriculture Institute. Bogor. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  15. L.A. Sutherland., R.J.F. Burton., A, Adamsone-Fiskovica., C,Hardy., B, Elzen,. L ,Debruyne., S, Flanigan. Inclusivity of on-farm demonstration: gender, age, and geographic location. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2020.1828115. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  16. U.P. Astuti, B. Honorita. Improving cognitive and affective of orange’s farmer in Lebong District Bengkulu. IAARD Press. Bogor. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. B Lukuyu., F Places., S Franzel,. E Kipto. Disseminating Improved Practices: Are Volunteer Farmer Trainers Effective? Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 18 (5) 525-540. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Taylor dan S. Bhasme. Model Farmers, Extension Networks and the Politics of Agricultural Knowledge Transfer. Journal of Rural Studies. Page 1-10. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. Kartono dan N. Amin. Effectiveness of Training in Knowledge Enhancement of Pest and Diseases of Rice Farming. Proceeding. IAARD PRESS. Bogor. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Basrowi dan Siskandar. Study Evaluation Based on Performance. Karya Putra Darwati. Bandung. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  21. J.M. Erbaugh., J.D. Meyer., J.D. Donner., I.M. Kidoido,. Assessing the Impact of Farmer Field School Participation on IPM Adoption in Uganda. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education. 17 (3) . (2010). [Google Scholar]
  22. U Khumairo., EA Lantinga,. Suprayogo, D., Schulte, RPO., Groot, JCJ.. Modifying the farmer field school method to support on-farm adaptation of complex rice system. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2019.1604391. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  23. K Davis., The complex processes of agricultural education and extension. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 25(30). P: 193-194. DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2019.1615170 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  24. K.S. Indraningsih. The influence of the elucidation of farmer decision through the adoption of integrated farming technological innovation. Agro Economy Journal. 29 (1): 1 – 24. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Purnomo, N. Pangarsa, K. Boga, Andri, dan M. Saeri. The Effectiveness of Counseling Methods in the Acceleration of Rice Technology Transfer in East Java. Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran. 1 (2): 192-204. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  26. G.O. Manurung, R. Mawardi, dan M.M. Andarias. Increased Knowledge of Katam Training Participants Using Lecture Methods and Practices in Lampung Province. Proceeding of National Seminar Agroinovation Spesific Location IAARD Press. Bogor. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  27. J.M. Laforge and C.Z. Levkoe. Seeding agroecology through new farmer training in Canada: knowledge, practice, and relational identities. Jurnal Local Environment. 23 (10) 991-1007. (2018.). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.