Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 233, 2021
2020 2nd International Academic Exchange Conference on Science and Technology Innovation (IAECST 2020)
Article Number 04011
Number of page(s) 5
Section MEA2020-Mechanical Engineering and Automation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123304011
Published online 27 January 2021
  1. J. Zhang, et al. Battle damage repair of aircraft structure (National Defense Industry Press, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Xue, S. Li. (2003) Research on decision support system for aircraft battle damage assessment and repair. Modern electronic technology, 20: 40-42 [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Zhao, B. Ji, H. Wei, J. Dai, F. Hu. (2014) A brief introduction of modeling and simulation in the research of aircraft battle damage repair. Electronics Optics & Control, 21, 02: 55-59 [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Yao, K. Cai, P. Zhou, L. Hu. (2011) Research on information management and decision making system for aircraft battle damage repair. New Technology & New Process. 09: 60-62 [Google Scholar]
  5. GJB 3897-1999, Requirements on compilation of technical manual for aircraft battle damage assessment and repair [S] [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Zhou. (2018) Research on normalization of fault information description. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering, 07: 70-72 [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Mu, Y. Zhong. (2016) Discussion on standardization of maintenance records. Science and Technology & Innovation, 01: 155 [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Zhang, et al. Aircraft battle damage repair engineering (Aviation Industry Press, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Yao, K. Cai, P. Zhou, K. Yu. (2012) Research on basic forms of aircraft battle damage. New Technology & New Process, 04: 47-49 [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Cai. (2015) Evaluation and hazard analysis of aero-engine battle damage. In: Proceedings of the 2nd China Aviation Science & Technology Conference. Beijing, pp. 143-147 [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Zhao, T. Zhang, M. Hao and J. Yang. (2020) Research on Military Aircraft Electrical Wiring System Damage Mode and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Natural Science Edition), 21(5): 106-111 [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Zhao, F. Sun, J. Yang. (2019) Research on MIL-DTL-87158 and the enlightenment to military aircraft battle damage repair. 297(06):23-26 [Google Scholar]
  13. NATO RTO Technical Activity Proposal (TAP) AVT-144, October 2004 [Google Scholar]
  14. NATO ARMP-7, “NATO R&M Terminology”, Edition 1, July 2001 [Google Scholar]
  15. AAP-6 NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  16. L.A. Kratz, R.T. Fowler, J.D. Cothran, (2002) Achieving Defence Transformation Through Total Life – Cycle System Management, Project Management (PM) Magazine, Vol. XXXI, No. 5:23-27 [Google Scholar]
  17. United States Government Accountability Office GAO Report GAO-03-300. (2003) Military Readiness – DoD Needs a Clear and Defined Process for Setting Aircraft Availability Goals in the New Security Environment [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Hart, (2006) Understanding Our Aging Aircraft Fleets: Deriving Aging Aircraft Requirements from AF Maintenance Metrics and Data, presentation at 9th Joint FAA/DoD/NASA Conference on Aging Aircraft [Google Scholar]
  19. US Air Force Instruction AFI 21-101, Aircraft and Equipment Maintenance Management, Section 1.15.3 Primary Maintenance Metrics, 29 June 2006 [Google Scholar]
  20. US Air Force Instruction AFI 21-103, Equipment Inventory, Status and Utilization Reporting, Attachment 2 Maintenance Status Codes and Condition Status Codes, 14 December 2005 [Google Scholar]
  21. H.S. Balaban, R.T. Brigantic, S.A. Wright, A. F. Papatyi, (2000) A Simulation Approach to Estimating Aircraft Mission Capable Rates for the United States Air Force, In: Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference [Google Scholar]
  22. FM 4-30.31 (FM 9-43-2), Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair. 2006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Air Force Research Laboratory, (1997) Air Vehicles Directorate Software Aids in A-10 Maintenance Issue. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Newsletter [Google Scholar]
  24. K. CAI, et al. (2010) Spare Part Requirement Prediction Method for Aircraft Battle Damage Repair. Electronics Optics & Control, 12: 123-128 [Google Scholar]
  25. Q. Pan, L. Xiong, X. Liu. (2007) Design and development of composite aircraft battle damage repair simulation system. Acta Armamentarii, 11: 25. [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Kaplan, J. Wallick. (1994) Aircraft Battle Damage Repair (BDR) Analysis Methodology Development Requirements. Logistics Management Inst McLean VA, 21:201-204 [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Bartholomeusz, P. Pearce, R. Vodicka. (2002) Rapid application technology: Aircraft battle damage repairs. In Advances in the bonded composite repair of metallic aircraft structure 21: 761-781 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Crum, K., Dierker, R., Grody, J., Thomas, D. L., & Clark, M. E. (2000). Aircraft Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (ABDAR) [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Hou, S. Li, et al. (2006). Evaluation of aircraft battle damage repair capability based on gray correlation-hierarchical analysis. Electronics Optics & Control. 4:35-39 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.