Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 234, 2021
The International Conference on Innovation, Modern Applied Science & Environmental Studies (ICIES2020)
Article Number 00055
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 02 February 2021
  1. Y.C. Yang, S.L. Chen, Determinants of global logistics hub ports: comparison of the port development policies of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan. Transport Pol 45, 179-189, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Song, N. Wang, Exploring temporal and spatial evolution of global coal supply-demand and flow structure. J. Energy 168, 1073-1080 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. Port Reform tool kit, second module: The Evolution of Ports in a Competitive World. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  4. J.P. Rodrigue, Theo. Notteboom, Port Terminals, Ports and Sites, chapter 4, The Geography of Transportation Systems, Fourth Edition, New York, Routledge, ISBN 978-1138669574 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Bichou, Chapter 24, Review of port performance approaches and a supply chain framework to port performance benchmarking. Res. Transport. Econ. 17, 567-598 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. A.C. Paixao, P.B. Marlow, P.B. Fourth generation ports––a question of agility? Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag 33, 355-376 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  7. J.S.L Lam, D.W. Song, Seaport network performance measurement in the context of global freight supply chains. POL MARIT RES 20, 47-54 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  8. P.T Lee, P. T. W., J.S.L. Lam, Container port competition and competitiveness analysis: Asian major ports. Handbook of ocean container transport logistics, Switzerland: Springer, Cham (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Kaliszewski, Fifth and sixth generation ports (5GP, 6GP) – evolution of economic and social roles of ports. Factors contribution to competitiveness (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. M.T. Acciaro, C. Vanelslander,C. Ferrari, A. Roumboutsos, G. Giuliano, J. S. L. Lam, and K. Kapros. Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: A Framework for Successful Innovation. Marit Pol Manag 41, 480-500. doi:10.1080/03088839.2014.932926 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Hanson, RJ. Nicholls .Extreme flood events and port cities through the twenty-first century. Maritime transport and the climate change challenge. Earthscan/Rutledge, New York, p. 24 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  12. A.H. Becker, A note on climate change adaptation for seaports: a challenge for global ports, a challenge for global society. Clim. Change 120, pp.683-695. Available at: (2013) [Google Scholar]
  13. Ng A.K.Y., Wang T., Yang Z., Li K.X., Jiang C. How is Business Adapting to Climate Change Impacts Appropriately? Insight from the Commercial Port Sector. J. Bus. Ethics..Available at: (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Cullinane, M. Khanna .Economies of scale in large containerships: optimal size and geographical implications. J. Transp. Geogr. 8, 3, 181-195 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Saengsupavanich, N. Coowanitwong, W.G. Gallardo, C. Lertsuchatavanich. Environmental performance evaluation of an industrial port and estate: ISO14001, port state control-derived indicators, J.Prod pp. 154-161 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Puig, C. Wooldridge, R.M. Darbra. Identification and selection of Environmental Performance Indicators for sustainable port development Mar. Pollut. Bull, 81,pp. 124-130 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Puig, C. Wooldridge, A. Michail, R.M. Darbra.Current status and trends of the environmental performance in European ports. Environ Sci Policy, 48, 57-66 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Teerawattana, Y.C. Yang, Environmental Performance Indicators for Green Port Policy Evaluation: Case Study of Laem Chabang Port, Asian J. Shipp. Logist, 35, 1, 63-69 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  19. American Association of Port Authorities. Alliance of the Ports of Canada, the Caribbean, Latin America and the United States, Port Industry Statistics (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. J.U. Schröder-Hinrichs ,E. Hollnagel,M. Baldauf,S. Hofmann ,A. Kataria, Marit Pol Manag ,40( 2013) [Google Scholar]
  21. Environmental Impacts of International Shipping, the Role of Ports, Organization for Economic Cooperative Development (OECD)(2011) [Google Scholar]
  22. EcoPorts Foundation. Guidelines for Self Diagnosis Method SDM. Version 1.4 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Puig , C. Wooldridge , J. Casal , R.M. Darbra ,Tool for the identification and assessment of Environmental Aspects in Ports (TEAP).Ocean & Coastal Manag. 113, 8-17 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. ESPO (European Sea Ports Organization), Port Environmental Review System (PERS). A Port-sector Specific Methodology to Start Implementing an Environmental Management System. Version 4. ESPO, Brussels (2011) [Google Scholar]
  25. IMO, International maritime organization. Maritime human factors and IMO policy .Retrieved from (2020) [Google Scholar]
  26. ISO (International Organisation for Standardisation). ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems [Google Scholar]
  27. United nations sustainable development goals.Retrieved from (2015) [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Kiron,N. Kruschwitz, K. Haanaes, M. Reeves, E. Goh. The innovation bottom line. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 54,3(2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.