Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 325, 2021
ICST 2021 – The 2nd Geoscience and Environmental Management Symposium
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 03004 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Environmental Management | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132503004 | |
Published online | 17 November 2021 |
- IAEA, The Fukushima Daiichi Accident, Technical Volume 1: Description And Context Of The Accident, Wina, Austria (2015) [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, Environmental Consequences of The Chernobyl Accident and Their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience, Report of the Chernobyl Forum Expert Group ‘Environment’, Wina, Austria (2015) [Google Scholar]
- G. Santayana, Reason in Common Sense, p. 284, volume 1 of The Life of Reason [Google Scholar]
- http://ugm.summon.serialssolutions.com/ [Google Scholar]
- E. Lewis, Nuclear Power Reactor Safety (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1977) [Google Scholar]
- H. Feiveson, Z. Mian, M.V. Ramana and F. von Hippel (Eds.), Managing Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors: Experience and Lessons from Around the World, International Panel on Fissile Materials (2011) [Google Scholar]
- M.C. Brady, Evaluation and Application of Delayed Neutron Precursor Data, Los Alamos, N.M.: Los Alamos National Lab (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, The Safety of Nuclear Power, A report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, INSAG-5, Wina, Austria (1992) [Google Scholar]
- B. Wealer, S. Bauer, N. Landry, H. Seiß, C.R. von Hirschhausen, Nuclear power reactors worldwide: Technology developments, diffusion patterns, and country-by-country analysis of implementation (1951-2017), DIW Data Documentation, No. 93, Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), (2018) [Google Scholar]
- N.L. Char and B.J. Csik, IAEA Bulletin: The IAEA at 30, 3/1987, 19-25 (1987) [Google Scholar]
- The British Journal of Radiology 7, New Series, No. 83, November, (1934) [Google Scholar]
- J.S. Walker and T.R. Wellock, A Short History of Nuclear Regulation, 1946–2009, NUREG/BR-0175, Rev. 2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2010) [Google Scholar]
- W.B. Lewis, The Accident to the NRX Reactor on December 12, 1952, Chalk River, Ontario:Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (1953) [Google Scholar]
- A.H. Snell, Geneva Diary, August 8–20, 1955, American Scientist, Vol. 43, No. 4 (October 1955), pP. 505-520 Published by: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society, Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27826696 Accessed: 12-06-2021 06:09 UTC [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, IAEA Safety Glossary, Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection 2018 Edition, Wina, Austria (2019) [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, Fundamental Safety Principles, Safety Fundamentals, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SF-1, Wina, Austria (2006) [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design, Specific Safety Requirements, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1) [Google Scholar]
- M. Drouin, B. Wagner, J. Lehner, V. Mubayi, Historical Review and Observations of Defense-inDepth, NUREG/KM-0009, Washington D.C: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2016) [Google Scholar]
- ICRP, Protection of the environment under different exposure situations. ICRP Publication 124, Ann. ICRP 43(1) (2014). [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, The Fukushima Daiichi Accident, Technical Volume 4: Radiological Consequences, Wina, Austria (2015). [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, The Fukushima Daiichi Accident, Technical Volume 5: Post Accident Recovery, Wina, Austria (2015) [Google Scholar]
- S. Matsuura, New Paradigm for Nuclear Safety, Japan Nuclear Safety Institute (2013) [Google Scholar]
- The Development of and Lessons from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident, 1st edition, Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc (2013) [Google Scholar]
- J. Buongiorno, R. Ballinger, M. Driscoll, B. Forget, C. Forsberg, M. Golay, M. Kazimi, N. Todreas, J. Yanch, Technical Lessons Learned from the Fukushima-Daichii Accident and Possible Corrective Actions for the Nuclear Industry: An Initial Evaluation, Cambridge, M.A.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2011) [Google Scholar]
- A. Omoto, The accident at TEPCO’s FukushimaDaiichi Nuclear Power Station: What went wrong and what lessons are universal? Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 731, (2013) 3–7 [Google Scholar]
- Progress in the Implementation of the IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety, Report by the Director General, GOV/INF/2015/13-GC(59)/INF/5 (31 July 2015) [Google Scholar]
- Department of Energy; Electric Power Research Institute; Environmental Protection Agency; Federal Emergency Management Agency; Institute of Nuclear Power Operations; Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Report on the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1987) [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, The Chernobyl Accident: Updating of INSAG-1, INSAG-7, A report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, Wina, Austria (1992) [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, Environmental Consequences of The Chernobyl Accident and Their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience, Report of the Chernobyl Forum Expert Group ‘Environment’. Wina, Austria (2006). ISBN 92–0–114705–8 [Google Scholar]
- V. Kashparov, Chernobyl: 30 Years of Radioactive Contamination Legacy, Ukrainian Institute of Agricultural Radiology (UIAR) of National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (NUBiP of Ukraine), Kiev, Ukraine (2016) [Google Scholar]
- CHERNOBYL disaster: Why are the consequences still observed? and Why is the international assistance still critical? Belarus Foreign Ministry (April 2009), retrieved from www.mfa.gov.by [Google Scholar]
- IAEA, Strengthening The Global Nuclear Safety Regime, INSAG-2, A report by the International Nuclear Safety Group, Wina, Austria (2006) [Google Scholar]
- Three Mile Island Accident, Backgrounder, Office of Public Affair (2018), www.nrc.gov [Google Scholar]
- 1979 Annual Report, Washington D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissionn (1979) [Google Scholar]
- L. Battist, J. Buchanan, F. Congel and H. Peterson, Population Dose And Health Impactof The Accident at The Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Preliminary Estimates Prepared by Ad Hoc Interagency Dose Assessment Group, NUREG0558, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1979) [Google Scholar]
- E. Molodstova, Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 185 (1994) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.