Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 328, 2021
International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2021)
Article Number 04008
Number of page(s) 7
Section Information System, Big Data, Design Application, IOT
Published online 06 December 2021
  1. L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, P. W. Airasian, K. A. Cruikshank, R. E. Mayer, P. R. Pintrich, J. Raths, M. C. Wittrock, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing; A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  2. Crowe, C. Dirks, M. P. Wenderoth, CBE – Life Sci Edu 7, 368-381 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. F. Kusuma, Z. A. Rinanza, Kinetik 3, 145-152 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. F. Sibo, C. O. Ocbogba, Int. J. Entr. Biz. Innov 2, 12-20 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Diab, S. Badie, Int. J. Mngmt. Info. Tech 9 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. Arrorio, Prob. Edu. 21st C 78, 309-313 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Arabacioglu, O. U. Ayse, J. Baltic Sci. Edu 15, 216-231 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. F. El-Sofany, H. F. El-Seoud, H. M. Alwadani, A. E. Alwadani, Int. J. Interact. M. Tech 8, 4-9 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. S. Muslimin, N. M. Nordin, A. Z. Mansor, M. M. Yunus, Malay. J. Learn. Instruc: Spec. Iss, 221-255 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. J-H. Bae, S-K. Kim, Adv. Comp. App, 597-602 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Astra, H. Nasbey, A. Nugraha, Eur. J. Math. Sci. Tech. Edu 11, 1081-1088 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. F. S. Arista, H. Kuswanto, Int. J. Instruc 11, 1-16 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Kocakoyun, H. Bicen, Cypriot J. Edu. Sci 12, 58-68 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Behera, Int. J. N. Trend Edu. Impl 4, 24-34 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. T. Sung, K. E. Chang, T. C. Liu, Comp. & Edu 94, 252-275 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. T. Martono, D. N. Oky, Int. J. Comp. Sci. Iss 11, 168-174 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Zahorec, A. Haskova, M. Bilek. J. Baltic Sci. Edu 13, 361-380 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Storey, C. Minner (Systematic instruction of functional skills for students and adults with disabilities, Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  19. K. L. Lubniewski, C. L. McArthur, W. Harriott, Int. Elec. J. Elem. Edu 10, 323-329 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Weng, T. Taber-Doughty, J. Spec. Edu. Tech 30, 43-58 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Furst (Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospective, Chicago: The National Society forthe Study of Education, (1994) [Google Scholar]
  22. Amer, Elec. J. Res Edu. Psyc 8, 213-230 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  23. Ari, Edu. Sci: Theor. & Prac 11, 767-772 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  24. Rahayu, Eur. J. Multidiscip. Studies 7, 80-85 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. S. A. Rahman, F. A. M. Nor, Eng. Lang. Teach 10, 245-256 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. G. R. Morrison, S. M. Ross, G. E. Kemp, Component of the instructional design plan, 12, Designing effective instruction, 7th edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. C-Y. Lee, T. S. Cherner, J. Infor. Tech. Edu: Res 14, 21-53 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  28. N. Tambunan, F. A. Batubara, Int. J. Res. Rev 7, 542-547 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  29. I. Fauzi, Globis, Eng-Ind J. Eng. Edu. Cult 6, 32-43 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  30. A.G. Silva, P. Simoes, A. Queiros, M. Rodrigues, N. P. Rocha, J. Med. Syst 44, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Crompoton, D. Burke, Comp. & Edu. 123, 53-64 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. L. Bernacki, J. A. Greene, H. Crompton, Cont. Edu. Psy 60, 1-34 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Nouri, S. R. N. Kalhori, M. Ghazisaeedi, G. Marchand, M. Yasini, J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc 25, 1089-1098 (2018) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Abildinova, M. Gulmira, Int. J. Envi. & Sci. Edu 11, 5128-5245 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  35. ANovitasari, Lisdiana, A. Marianti, J. Innov. Sci. Edu 10, 70-78 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  36. Sub Direktorat Statistik Komunikasi dan Teknologi Informasi, Statistik Telekomunikasi Indonesia 2019 (Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistika, (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.