Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 328, 2021
International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2021)
Article Number 05009
Number of page(s) 7
Section Material Theory, Modeling & Characterisation, System Manufacture, Dynamic System
Published online 06 December 2021
  1. V.N. Castelo-Branco, I. Santana, V.O. Di-Sarli, S.P. Freitas, A.G. Torres, Antioxidant capacity is a 364 surrogate measure of the quality and stability of vegetable oils, European Journal of Lipid Science and 365 Technology, 118 (2016) 224-235. 366 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Choe, D.B. Min, Mechanisms and Factors for Edible Oil Oxidation, Comprehensive Reviews in Food 367 Science and Food Safety, 5 (2006) 169-186. 368 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Yang, Q. Li, X. Yu, X. Chen, Y. Wang, A novel method for determining peroxide value of edible oils 369 using electrical conductivity, Food Control, 39 (2014) 198-203. 370 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Wang, Z. Huyan, B. Jing, X. Mao, X. Yu, Analysis of Edible Oil Oxidation Based on Changes in the 371 Electrical Conductivity of the electronic nose and electronic 388 tongue, Food Chemistry, 101 (2007) 485-491. 389 [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Xu, X. Yu, l. Liu, R. Zhang, A novel method for qualitative analysis of edible oil oxidation using an 374 electronic nose, Food Chemistry, 202 (2016) 229–235. 375 [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Xu, X. Yu, L. Liu, R. Zhang, A novel method for qualitative analysis of edible oil oxidation using an 376 electronic nose, Food Chemistry, 202 (2016) 229-235. 377 [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Li, W. Cai, D. Sun, Y. Liu, A Quick Method for Determining Total Polar Compounds of Frying Oils 378 Using Electric Conductivity, Food Analytical Methods, 9 (2016) 1444-1450. 379 [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Śliwińska, P. Wiśniewska, T. Dymerski, J. Namieśnik, W. Wardencki, Food Analysis Using Artificial 380 Senses, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62 (2014) 1423-1448. 381 [Google Scholar]
  9. E.A. Baldwin, J. Bai, A. Plotto, S. Dea, Electronic noses and tongues: applications for the food and 382 pharmaceutical industries, Sensors (Basel), 11 (2011) 4744-4766. 383 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Mildner-Szkudlarz, H.H. Jeleń, R. Zawirska-Wojtasiak, The use of electronic and human nose for 384 monitoring rapeseed oil autoxidation, European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 110 [Google Scholar]
  11. M.S. Cosio, D. Ballabio, S. Benedetti, C. Gigliotti, Evaluation of different storage conditions of extra 387 virgin olive oils with an innovative recognition tool built by means of Extracted Aqueous (2008) 61-385 72. 386 [Google Scholar]
  12. M.J. Lerma-García, E.F. Simó-Alfonso, A. Bendini, L. Cerretani, Metal oxide semiconductor sensors 390 for monitoring of oxidative status evolution and sensory analysis of virgin olive oils with different 391 phenolic content, Food Chemistry, 117 (2009) 608-614. 392 [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Yin, Y. Zhao, A feature selection strategy of E-nose data based on PCA coupled with Wilks Λ-393 statistic for discrimination of vinegar samples, Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 13 394 (2019) 2406-2416. 39 [Google Scholar]
  14. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AmericanOil Chemists’ Society, 4th edn., edited by D. Firestone, Ameri-can Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1997, Method Cd 8-53. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shantha, N.C., and E.A. Decker, Rapid, Sensitive, Iron-Based Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Peroxide Values of Food Lipids, J. AOAC Int. 77:421–424 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hara, S., and Y. Totani, A Highly Sensitive Method for the Micro-determination of Lipid Hydroperoxides by Potentiome-try, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 65:1948–1950 (1988). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamm, D.L., E.G. Hammond, V. Parvanah, and H.E. Snyder, The Determination of Peroxides by the Stamm Method, Ibid. 42:920–922 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  18. Dong, J., K. Ma, F.R. van de Voort, and A.A. Ismail, Stoichio-metric Determination of Hydroperoxides in Oils by Fourier Transform Near-Infrared Spectroscopy, J. AOAC Int. 80:345–352 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th edn.,AOAC International, Gaithersburg, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  20. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Car-olina, 1990 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mehlenbacher, V.C., The Analysis of Fats and Oils, Garrard Press, Champaign, (1960), pp. 219–227. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mair, R.D., and R.T. Hall, Determination of Organic Peroxides by Physical, Chemical and Colorimetric Methods, in Organic Peroxides, edited by D. Swern, Wiley Interscience, New York, (1971), pp. 535–636 [Google Scholar]
  23. Abd Gani, S.S., Mokhtar, N.F., Zaidan, U.H., Borhan, F.P., Talha, K., Azahar, N.F., 2018. Optimization of Moisturizing Clay Soap Containing Pitaya (Hylocereus Polyrhizus) SeedExtract using D-Optimal Mixture Experimental Design. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, Vol 43(1), pp. 45–57 [Google Scholar]
  24. Adamis, Z., Fodor, J., Williams, R.B., 2005. Environmental Health Criteria 231, Bentonite, Kaolin and Selected Clay Minerals. Available Online c/ehc_231.pdf, Accessed on May 22, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  25. Araseretnam, S., Venujah, K., 2019. Preparation of Soaps by using Different Oil and Analyze their Properties. Journal Natural Products Chemistry and Research, Volume 7(1), pp. 1–4 [Google Scholar]
  26. Asad, Md.A., Shantanu, Kar., Ahmeduzzaman, M., Raquibul Hassan, M., 2013. Suitable of Bentonite Clay: An analytical Approach. International Journal of Earth Science, Vol 2 (3), pp. 88–95 [Google Scholar]
  27. Awang, R., Ahmad, S., Ghazali, R., 2001. Properties of Sodium Soap Derived from Palm Based Dihydroxystearic Acid. Journal of Oil Palm Research, Vol 13 (2), pp. 33–38 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.