EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 328 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 328 (2021) 06008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 328, 2021
International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2021)
Article Number 06008
Number of page(s) 8
Section Mathematic Model, Learning Modelep, Epidemic Model
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132806008
Published online 06 December 2021
  1. Liliasari. The use of interactive multimedia to enhance students’ generic science skills. International Conference on Rural Information and Communication Technology, ITB, Bandung, June 2009. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. Marttunen, M., Leena, L., Litosseliti, L., & Lund, K.. Argumentation skills as prerequisites for collaborative learning among finish, french, and english secondary school students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(4), 365-384. (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, C.H., & She, H. C. The impact of recurrent on-line synchronous scientific argumentation on students’argumentation and conceptual change. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 197-210. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  4. Trilling, Bernie & Fadel, Charles. 21ST Century Skills, Lerning for Life in Our Times. San Fransisco CA: John Wiley & Sons. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  5. Suto, Irenka. 21st Century Skills: Ancient, ubiquitous, enigmatic? Paper Published in January 2013 in Research Matters: Cambridge Assessment Publication. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  6. Muslim. Pengembangan program perkuliahan fisika sekolah berorientasi kemampuan berargumentasi calon guru fisika (Disertasi tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  7. Sadler, T. D. Informal reasoning regarding sosioscientific issues: a critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  8. Suyono; Nasrudin, Harun; & Yonata, Bertha. Consistency and Relevance of Structured Lecture Materials in Physical Chemistry 3 Subjects. Series Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. Suyono; Nasrudin, Harun; & Yonata, Bertha. Pengembangan Bahan Kuliah Terstruktur Pada Mata Kuliah Kimia Fisika 3 untuk Memfasilitasi Keterampilan Proses Sains, Berargumentasi, dan Pemecahan Masalah. Laporan Penelitian. LPPM Unesa. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. Suyono & Hariyanto. Belajar dan Pembelajaran, Teori dan Konsep Dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. Routman, R. Invitations changing as teachers and learners. Toronto: Irwin Publishing. (1991) [Google Scholar]
  12. Masters, G. N., & Forster, M. Developmental assessment. Victoria:ACER. (2008) [Google Scholar]
  13. Stears, M. & Gopal, N. Exploring alternative assessment strategies in science classrooms. South African Journal of Education. Vol 30, pp: 591-604. (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rowe, J. Assessmen as Learning-ETEC 510, Diakses Oktober 2016 dariwww.etec.ubc.ca/510wiki/Assessment_as_Lear ning#Assessment_ for_Learning. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. Earl, K. & Giles, D. An-other Look at Assessment: Assessment in Learning. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’Work, 8(1), 11-20. (2011) [Google Scholar]
  16. Earl, L. Assessmen as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press. (2003) [Google Scholar]
  17. Earl, L. & Katz, S. Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. Western and Northern Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Education (WNCP).http://www.wncp.ca/media/40539/rethink. pdf. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  18. Arikunto, Suharsimi. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi Revisi, h. 64-79 9 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  19. Gronlund, N. E. Assessment of student achievement (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. (2003) [Google Scholar]
  20. Yusuf, Muri. Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, (Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, 2015), h. 64. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  21. Chin, M., & Osborne, J. Supporting argumentation through student’s question in science classroom. Journal of The Learning Science, 19(2), 230 – 284. (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Suyono; Nasrudin, H.; Yonata, B.; & Sabtiawan, W. The Claims Statements from Viral Videos for Instrument Development to Assess Argumentation Thinking Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 1899, 2nd Workshop on Engineering, Education, Applied Sciences and Technology (WEAST) 2020 5 Octpber 2020, Makasar Indonesia. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  23. Febrianto, Yulizar Verda Febrianto; Palupi, Nurheni Sri; & Kusnandar, Feri. Pengujian Mutu Bihun Instan sebagai Produk dalam Program Pemberian Makanan Tambahan (PMT) untuk Ibu Hamil. Jurnal Mutu Pangan Vol. 4(1): 44-50, 2017 ISSN 2355-5017 44 @JMP2017. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. Fu, Bin Xiao. Asian noodles: History, classification, raw materials, and processing. Food Research International 41 (2008) 888–902. (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fenrich, P. Instructional design tips for virtually teaching practical skills. In Proceedings of the 2004 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference. Rockhampton, Australia June 25–28, 2004. (2004) [Google Scholar]
  26. Hasan, Saleem, Diola Bagayoko, dan Ella L. Kelly. Misconceptions and The Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Journal: Physics Education, Vol. 34, no. 5, hal. 294-299, http://iopscience.iop.org/0031-9120/34/5/304, diakses tanggal 13 Januari 2011. (1999) [Google Scholar]
  27. Borich, G. D. Observation skills for effective teaching. Texas: The University of Texas. (1994) [Google Scholar]
  28. Silverius, Suke. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar dan Umpan Balik. Cetakan Ke-1. Jakarta: PT Grasindo. (1991) [Google Scholar]
  29. Dawson, Vaille & Venville, Grady Jane. High-School Students’ Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An Indicator of Science Literacy? International Journal of Science Education. Vol. 31, no. 11, 15 July 2009, pp 1421-1445. (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.