EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 331 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 331 (2021) 01013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 331, 2021
International Conference on Disaster Mitigation and Management (ICDMM 2021)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 6
Section COVID-19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202133101013
Published online 13 December 2021
  1. “Covid19.go.id,” [Online]. Available: https://covid19.go.id/. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Suryahadi, R. Al Izzati, and D. Suryadarma, “Estimating the impact of Covid-19 on poverty in Indonesia,” Bull. Indonesia. Econ. Stud., 56, 2, 175–192 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. E. Yudiatmaja, Y. Yudithia, T. Samnuzulsari, S. Suyito, E. Edison, Social capital of local communities in the water resources management: An insight from Kepulauan Riau,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 771, 1 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. N. E. Ganapati, “Downsides of social capital for women during disaster recovery: Toward a more critical approach,” Adm. Soc., 45, 1, 72–96 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Partelow, “Social capital and community disaster resilience: post-earthquake tourism recovery on Gili Trawangan, Indonesia,” Sustain. Sci., 16, 1, 203–220 (2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. I. A. Rana, S. S. Bhatti, A. B. Aslam, A. Jamshed, J. Ahmad, and A. A. Shah, “COVID-19 risk perception and coping mechanisms: Does gender make a difference?” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 55, 1–10 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  7. C. H. Hui, “Measurement of individualism-collectivism,” J. Res. Pers., 22, 17–36 (1988). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Yıldırım, E. Geçer, and Ö. Akgül, “The impacts of vulnerability, perceived risk, and fear on preventive behaviors against COVID-19,” Psychol. Heal. Med., 26, 1, 35–43 (2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Suyito and N. A. Ghani, “The Pattern of People Participation of Island Society of Dendun Village, Bintan Regency,” Policy Soc. Rev., 1, 1, 1–6 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Yudithia, E. Edison, D. Kristanti, T. Samnuzulsari, S. Suyito, and W. E. Yudiatmaja, “Evaluating the Impact of Technological Adoption Policy for Rural Coastal Communities,” E3S Web Conf., 202, 1–7 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Allik and A. Realo, “Individualism-collectivism and social capital,” J. Cross. Cult. Psychol., 35, 1, 29–49 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Kristanti et al., “Network governance in addressing climate change: a case study of the Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (ACCCRN) in Indonesia,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 724, 1, 012091 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Plohl and B. Musil, “Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: the critical role of trust in science,” Psychol. Heal. Med., 26, 1, 1–12 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. G. G. Alrubaiee, T. A. H. Al-Qalah, and M. S. A. Al-Aawar, “Knowledge, attitudes, anxiety, and preventive behaviors towards COVID-19 among health care providers in Yemen: An online cross-sectional survey,” BMC Public Health, 20, 1, 1–11 (2020). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. W. B. de Bruin, “Age differences in COVID-19 risk perceptions and mental health: Evidence from a national U.S. survey conducted in March 2020,” J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., 76, 2, e24–e29, (2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Yamaguchi, “Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self,” in individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications, no. Cross-cultural research and methodology series, U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, and G. Yoon, Eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 18, 175–188 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Onyx and P. Bullen, “Measuring social capital in five communities,” J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 36, 1, 23–42 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. W. E. Yudiatmaja et al., “Reducing solid waste through waste banks: an empirical study in Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 755, 1, 012076 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Y. Prastya, S. D. Meilinda, R. Sulistiowati, A. Alfiandri, and W. E. Yudiatmaja, “Application of SEM: an analysis of Depok City’s website,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1088, 1, 012028 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Eur. Bus. Rev., 31, 1, 2–24 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. W. W. Chin, “How to write up and report PLS analyses,” in Handbook of partial least squares, V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang, Eds. Berlin: Springer, 655–690 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” J. Mark. Res., 18, 1, 39–50 (1981). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. B. Kline, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th Ed. New York: The Guilford Press (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Germani, L. Buratta, E. Delvecchio, and C. Mazzeschi, “Emerging adults and covid-19: The role of individualism-collectivism on perceived risks and psychological maladjustment,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 10, 1–15 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  26. W. E. Yudiatmaja et al., “Social policy on the rural coastal communities: Why the implementation fails?,” E3S Web Conf., 232, 1–7 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  27. K.-I. Yoon, “The cultural effects of individualism and collectivism on social capital,” Int. Area Rev., 13, 2, 187–212 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.