Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 235, 2021
2020 International Conference on New Energy Technology and Industrial Development (NETID 2020)
Article Number 02059
Number of page(s) 4
Section Industrial Technology Development and Industrial Structure Adjustment and Upgrading
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123502059
Published online 03 February 2021
  1. M. K. Sheng and J. Luo, “Comparative research on strategy and policy of science and technology innovation between china and india take STI in India and China’s “outline of nation innovation-driven develoment strategy” as an example, ” Science & Technology progress and policy, vol. 35, pp. 127-134, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Li, H. Guo, S. Y. Cooper and H. Q. Wang, “The influencing factors of the technology standard alliance collaborative innovation of emerging industry”, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 24, pp. 1-17, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Wu, Z. Yang, X. Hu, H. Wang and J. Huang, “Exploring driving forces of sustainable development of China’s new energy vehicle industry: an analysis from the perspective of an innovation ecosystem, ” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1-24, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Villani, E. Rasmussen and R. Grimaldi, “How intermediary organizations facilitate university industry technology transfer: a proximity approach, ” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 114, pp. 86-102, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Stezano, “The role of technology centers as intermediary organizations facilitating links for innovation: four cases of federal technology centers in Mexico, ” Review of Policy Research, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 642-666, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Fu, Q. Wang and X. Zhao, “The influence of platform service innovation on value co-creation activities and the network effect, ” Journal of Service Management, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 348-388, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Hong, J. R. Hu and W. Wang, “Research on the innovative clusters and countermeasures of scince & technology information resource sharing platform kunming, Chengdu platform as an example, ” 5th International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology, pp. 386-391, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Abbate, A. P. Codini and B. Aquilani, “Knowledge co-creation in Open innovation digital platforms: processes, tools and services, ” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1434-1447, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Eloranta and T. Turunen, “Platforms in service-driven manufacturing: Leveraging complexity by connecting, sharing, and integrating, ” Industrial Marketing Management, 2015, no. 10, pp. 1-9. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Ellraml, T. Wendyl and B. Corey, “Understanding and managing the service supply chain, ” Journal of supply china management, 2004, no. 22, pp. 17-32. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Howells, “Intermediations in the role of intermediaries in innovation, ” Research Policy, 2006, no. 35, pp. 609-766. [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Lin, J. Wu and P. Wang, “Symbiosis and Coupling between S&T Intermediary Service Chain and Innovation Chain Theory Building and Policy Implication, ” Technology economics, 2014, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 7-13. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Wang, H. Ao and H. Chen, “The research of chain structure and value realization mechanism Based on Innovation Chain in s&t service Industry, ” Science Technology Progress and Policy, 2015, vol. 32, no. 15, pp. 59-63. [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Xia, Q. Tan, B. Wang, “A study of a new type of industry innovation platform for high-end oriented equipment manufacturing industry from the perspective of intelligent production and service network, ” Science research management, 2017, vol. 12, no. 38, pp. 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Li, Y. Zhou, H. Wang and C. Wu, “Research on the Evolution of Regional Strategic Emerging Industry Innovation Service Network based on Improved BBV Mode, ” Forecasting, 2020, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 89-96. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.