EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 236 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 236 (2021) 02013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 236, 2021
3rd International Conference on Energy Resources and Sustainable Development (ICERSD 2020)
Article Number 02013
Number of page(s) 9
Section New Energy Technology and Clean Energy Production and Transformation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123602013
Published online 09 February 2021
  1. Porter ME, van der Linde C. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harv Bus Rev 1995;73(5):120-134. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wong CWY, Lai KH, Shang KC, Lu CS, Leung TKP. Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. Int J Prod Econ 2012;140:283-294. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rahman MS, Noman AH, Shahari F, Aslam M, Gee CS, Ruhanalsa C, Pervin S. Efficient energy consumption in industrial sectors and its effect on environment: A comparative analysis between G8 and Southeast Asian emerging economies. Energy 2016;97:82-89. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shi J, Li H, Guan J, Sun X, Guan Q, Liu X. Evolutionary features of global embodied energy flow between sectors: A complex network approach. Energy 2017;140:395-405. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang YH, Wu JH. Analyzing the driving forces behind CO2 emissions and reduction strategies for energy-intensive sectors in Taiwan, 1996-2006. Energy 2013;57:402-411. [Google Scholar]
  6. Olonscheck M, Walther C, Lüdeke M, Kropp JP. Feasibility of energy reduction targets under climate change: The case of the residential heating energy sector of the Netherlands. Energy 2015;90:560-569. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shen P, Yang B. Projecting Texas energy use for residential sector under future climate and urbanization scenarios: A bottom-up method based on twenty-year regional energy use data. Energy 2020;193:116694. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartelsman E, Haltiwanger J, Scarpetta S. Crosscountry differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. Am Econ Rev 2013;103(1):305-334. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang M, Yang F, Sun C. Factor market distortion correction, resource reallocation and potential productivity gains: An empirical study on China’s heavy industry sector. Energ Econ 2018,69:270-279. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jin W, Zhang H, Liu S, Zhang, H. Technological innovation, environmental regulation, and green total factor efficiency of industrial water resources. J Clean Prod 2019,211:61-69. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu Y, Zhu Q, Seuring S. Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity. Int J Prod Econ 2017;187:182-195. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu Y, Zhang Y, Batista L, Rong K. Green operations: What’s the role of supply chain flexibility?. Int J Prod Econ 2019;214:30-43. [Google Scholar]
  13. Geels FW. The impact of the financial-economic crisis on sustainability transitions: Financial investment, governance and public discourse. Environ Innov Soc Tr 2013;6:67-95. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brem A, Nylund P, Viardot E. The impact of the 2008 financial crisis on innovation: A dominant design perspective. J Bus Res 2020;110:360-369. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ryzhenkov M. Resource misallocation and manufacturing productivity: The case of Ukraine. J Comp Econ 2016;44:41-55. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shenoy A. Market failures and misallocation. J Dev Econ 2017;128:65-80. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bento P, Restuccia D. On average establishment size across sectors and countries. J Monetary Econ 2020;In press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chung Y, Fare R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. J Environ Manage 1997;51(3):229-240. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fair R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka CA. Accounting for air pollution emissions in measures of state manufacturing productivity growth. J Regional Sci 2001;41(3):381-409. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tombe T, Winter J. Environmental policy and misallocation: The productivity effect of intensity standards. J Environ Econ Manage 2015;72:137-163. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bian Y, Song K, Bai J. Market segmentation, resource misallocation and environmental pollution. J Clean Prod 2019;228:376-387. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen PH, Ong CF, Hsu SC. The linkages between internationalization and environmental strategies of multinational construction firms. J Clean Prod 2016;116:207-216. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hötte K. How to accelerate green technology diffusion? Directed technological change in the presence of coevolving absorptive capacity. Energ Econ 2020;85:104565. [Google Scholar]
  24. Murphy KM, Shleifer A, Vishny RW. Income distribution, market size, and industrialization. Q J Econ 1989;104:537-564. [Google Scholar]
  25. Restuccia D, Rogerson R. Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous establishments. Rev Econ Dynam 2008;11(4):707-720. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hsieh CT, Klenow PJ. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q J Econ 2009;124(4):1403-1448. [Google Scholar]
  27. Aoki S. A simple accounting framework for the effect of resource misallocation on aggregate productivity. J Jpn Econ 2012;26 (4):473-494. [Google Scholar]
  28. Banerjee AV, Moll B. Why does misallocation persist?. Am Econ J Macroecon 2010;2(1):189-206. [Google Scholar]
  29. Buera FJ, Shin Y. Productivity growth and capital flows: The dynamics of reforms. Am Econ J Macroecon 2017;9(3):147-185. [Google Scholar]
  30. Scarpellini S, Marín-Vinuesa LK, Portillo-Tarragona P, Moneva JM. Defining and measuring different dimensions of financial resources for business ecoinnovation and the influence of the firms’ capabilities. J Clean Prod 2018;204:258-269. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hasan MM, Habib A. Corporate life cycle, organizational financial resources and corporate social responsibility. J Contemp Account Econ 2017;13:20-36. [Google Scholar]
  32. Holz CA. The impact of the liability-asset ratio on profitability in China’s industrial state-owned enterprises. China Econ Rev 2002;13:1-26. [Google Scholar]
  33. Alexopoulos I, Kounetas K, Tzelepis D. Environmental and financial performance. Is there a win-win or a win-loss situation? Evidence from the Greek manufacturing. J Clean Prod 2018;197:1275-1283. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kleindorfer PR, Singhal K, Van Wassenhove LN. Sustainable operations management. Prod. Oper. Manage. 2005;14(4):482-492. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hitt MA, Xu K, Carnes CM. Resource based theory in operations management research. J Oper Manag 2016;41:77-94. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bernardo MR, Campani CH. Liability driven investment with alternative assets: Evidence from Brazil. Emerg Mark Rev 2019; 41:100653. [Google Scholar]
  37. Liang D, Liu T. Does environmental management capability of Chinese industrial firms improve the contribution of corporate environmental performance to economic performance? Evidence from 2010 to 2015. J Clean Prod 2017;142:2985-2998. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu T, Zhang Y, Liang D. Can ownership structure improve environmental performance in Chinese manufacturing firms? The moderating effect of financial performance. J Clean Prod 2019;225:58-71. [Google Scholar]
  39. Furman JL, Porter ME, Stern S, The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res Policy 2002;31(6):899-933. [Google Scholar]
  40. Porter ME, Stern S. National innovation capacity in world economic forum 2002: The Global Competiveness Report 2001-2002. New York: Oxford University Press 2002. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu Z, Li X. Has China’s Belt and Road Initiative promoted its green total factor productivity?— Evidence from primary provinces along the route. Energ Policy 2019;129:360-369. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yuan B. Effectiveness-based innovation or efficiency-based innovation? Trade-off and antecedents under the goal of ecological total-factor energy efficiency in China. Environ Sci Pollut R 2019;26(17):17333-17350. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yuan B, Xiang Q. Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: Based on an extended CDM model. J Clean Prod 2018,176:895-908. [Google Scholar]
  44. Boeing P. The allocation and effectiveness of China’s R&D subsidies-Evidencefrom listed firms. Res Policy 2016;45:1774-1789. [Google Scholar]
  45. Alazzani A, Wan-Hussin WN. Global reporting initiative’s environmental reporting: A study of oil and gas companies. Ecol Indic 2013;32:19-24. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen J, Tang O, Feldmann A. Applying GRI reports for the investigation of environmental management practices and company performance in Sweden, China and India. J Clean Prod 2015;98:36-46. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vigneau L, Humphreys M, Moon J. How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. J. Bus. Ethics 2015;131(2):469-486. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yu W, Ramanathan, R. An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance. Int J Prod Res 2015;53(21):6390-6407. [Google Scholar]
  49. Amran A, Lee SP, Devi SS. The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Bus Strat Environ 2014;23(4):217-235. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gao C, Sun M, Shen B, Li R, Tian L. Optimization of China’s energy structure based on portfolio theory. Energy 2014;77:890-897. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kong D, Yang X, Xu J. Energy price and cost induced innovation: Evidence from China. Energy 2020;192:116586. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.