EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 237 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 237 (2021) 03004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 237, 2021
3rd International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2020)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 11
Section Architecture Science and Civil Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123703004
Published online 09 February 2021
  1. Cohen J E. Human population: the next half century[J]. Science, 2003, 302 (5648):1172-1175. [Google Scholar]
  2. Strecker E W, Quigley M M, Urbonas B R, et al. Determining Urban Storm Water BMP Effectiveness[J]. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2001, 127(3):144-149. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dietz M E. Low Impact Development Practices: A Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Directions[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2007, 186 (1-4):351-363. [Google Scholar]
  4. Norton B A, Coutts A M, Livesley S J, et al. Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 134:127-138. [Google Scholar]
  5. Abbott C L, Comino Mateos L. IN SITU HYDRAULIC PERFORMANCE OF A PERMEABLE PAVEMENT SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEM[J]. Water and Environment Journal, 2003, 17(3):187-190. [Google Scholar]
  6. Coutts A M, Tapper N J, Beringer J, et al. Watering our cities: Thecapacity for Water Sensitive Urban Design to support urban cooling and improve human thermal comfort in the Australian context[J]. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 2013, 37(1):2-28. [Google Scholar]
  7. van Roon M. Water localisation and reclamation: Steps towards low impact urban design and development[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 83(4):437-447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lim H S, Lu X X. Sustainable urban stormwater management in the tropics: An evaluation of Singapore ’ s ABC Waters Program[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 538:842-862. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu W, Chen W, Feng Q, et al. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Green Infrastructures on Community Stormwater Reduction and Utilization: A Case of Beijing, China[J]. Environmental Management, 2016, 58(6):1015-1026. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang M, Zhang D, Adhityan A, et al. Assessing costeffectiveness of bioretention on stormwater in response to climate change and urbanization for future scenarios[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 543. [Google Scholar]
  11. Walsh C J, Fletcher T D, Burns M J. Urban stormwater runoff: a new class of environmental flow problem[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(9):e45814. [Google Scholar]
  12. Weng Q. Modeling urban growth effects on surface runoff with the integration of remote sensing and GIS[J]. Environ Manage, 2001, 28(6):737-748. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jiang Y, Zevenbergen C, Ma Y. Urban pluvial flooding and stormwater management: A contemporary review of China’s challenges and “sponge cities” strategy[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2018, 80:132-143. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jamali B, Löwe R, Bach P M, et al. A rapid urban flood inundation and damage assessment model[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 564:1085-1098. [Google Scholar]
  15. O Driscoll M, Clinton S, Jefferson A, et al. Urbanization Effects on Watershed Hydrology and In-Stream Processes in the Southern United States[J]. Water, 2010, 2(3):605-648. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang Xiong, Wang Xiaofu. Research progress on the influence mechanism of some factors on the performance of permeable brick [J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33 (23): 3949-3954. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu Yanan. Research on application and promotion of permeable pavement in sponge City [D]. Beijing University of architecture, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ao Jing. Study on the regulation of urban permeable pavement system on local geothermal wet climate [D]. Harbin University of technology, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Qin Yuchao. Study on the effect of runoff reduction and pollutant reduction of typical permeable pavement in cities [D]. Xi’an University of technology, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. State Administration for Quality Supervision and Inspection and Quarantine Permeable Paving Bricks and Permeable Paving Flags[J]. GB/T 25993-2010, Standards Press of China, Beijing, 2011 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhu M, Wang H, Liu L, et al. Preparation and characterization of permeable bricks from gangue and tailings[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 148:484-491. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sand-based water permeable brick[S]. JG/T 376-2012, Standards Press of China, Beijing, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang Z, Sun Z, Wang P. Effects of Some Factors on Properties of Porous Pervious Concrete[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2005, 8(5):513-519. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kayhanian M, Anderson D, Harvey J T, et al. Permeability measurement and scan imaging to assess clogging of pervious concrete pavements in parking lots[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 95(1):114-123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. SIRIWARDENE N, DELETIC A, FLETCHER T. Clogging of stormwater gravel infiltration systems and filters: Insights from a laboratory study[J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(7):1433-1440. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lian C, Zhuge Y, Beecham S. The relationship between porosity and strength for porous concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(11):4294-4298. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chindaprasirt P, Hatanaka S, Chareerat T, et al. Cement paste characteristics and porous concrete properties[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2008, 22(5):894-901. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ba M, Qian C, Guo X, et al. Effects of steam curing on strength and porous structure of concrete with low water/binder ratio[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(1):123-128. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.