EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 241 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 241 (2021) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 241, 2021
2020 8th International Conference on Environment Pollution and Prevention (ICEPP 2020)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Assessment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124102001
Published online 10 March 2021
  1. Steurer, R. and M. Hametner, Objectives and indicators in sustainable development strategies: similarities and variances across Europe. Sustainable Development, 2013. 21(4): p. 224-241. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rwelamila, P., A. Talukhaba, and A. Ngowi, Project procurement systems in the attainment of sustainable construction. Sustainable Development, 2000. 8(1): p. 39. [Google Scholar]
  3. Langston, C.A. and G.K. Ding, Sustainable Practices: Development and Construction in an Environmental Age, 2001, Butterworth Heinemann: London. [Google Scholar]
  4. IPCC, A., Intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2007, IPCC Secretariat Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cole, R.J. and M. Jose Valdebenito, The importation of building environmental certification systems: international usages of BREEAM and LEED. Building Research & Information, 2013. 41(6): p. 662-676. [Google Scholar]
  6. Torcellini, P., et al., Zero energy buildings: a critical look at the definition. National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Department of Energy, US, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gowri, K., Green building rating systems: An overview. ASHRAE Journal, 46 (11): 56-60, 2004. 46 (PNNL-SA-42827). [Google Scholar]
  8. Morrow, W.R., et al., Analysis of policies to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions from the US transportation sector. Energy Policy, 2010. 38(3): p. 1305-1320. [Google Scholar]
  9. Todd, J.A., et al., Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the Green Building Challenge. Building Research & Information, 2001. 29(5): p. 324-335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Council, U.G.B., LEED green building rating systems. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hart, D.M., Don’t Worry about the Government? The LEED-NC’Green Building’Rating System and Energy Efficiency in US Commercial Buildings. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Turner, C., M. Frankel, and U.G.B. Council, Energy performance of LEED for new construction buildings. 2008: New Buildings Institute Vancouver, WA. [Google Scholar]
  13. Peterson, E.A. and G.W. Ulferts, Perspectives On The LEED (Leadership In Energy And Environmental Design) System As A Green Certification Standard. Journal of Sustainability Management (JSM), 2014. 2(2): p. 51-58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Todd, J.A., C. Pyke, and R. Tufts, Implications of trends in LEED usage: rating system design and market transformation. Building Research & Information, 2013. 41(4): p. 384-400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cortese, A., C. Higgins, and M. Lyles, Getting to Zero: The 2014 Net Zero Energy Status Report Findings for Commercial Buildings. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Braun, J., et al., Whole building control system design and evaluation: Simulation-based assessment, 2012, Citeseer. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yang, L., J.C. Lam, and C.L. Tsang, Energy performance of building envelopes in different climate zones in China. Applied Energy, 2008. 85(9): p. 800-817. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dutil, Y., D. Rousse, and G. Quesada, Sustainable buildings: An ever evolving target. Sustainability, 2011. 3(2): p. 443-464. [Google Scholar]
  19. Laustsen, J., Energy efficiency requirements in building codes, energy efficiency policies for new buildings. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2008: p. 477-488. [Google Scholar]
  20. Torcellini, P., S. Pless, and M. Leach, A pathway for net-zero energy buildings: creating a case for zero cost increase. Building Research & Information, 2015. 43(1): p. 25-33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stranger, M., S. Potgieter-Vermaak, and R. Van Grieken, Comparative overview of indoor air quality in Antwerp, Belgium. Environment International, 2007. 33(6): p. 789-797. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Musall, E., et al. Net Zero energy solar buildings: an overview and analysis on worldwide building projects. in EuroSun conference. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  23. Eley, C., Policy Mechanisms: Role of Building Codes in Achieving Zero Net Energy Goals. International Seminar on Zero Net Energy Buildings, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. Thomas, W.D. and J.J. Duffy, Energy performance of net-zero and near net-zero energy homes in New England. Energy and Buildings, 2013. 67: p. 551-558. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dembo, A., Least Cost Analysis for Canadian New Housing-Identifying the Most Cost-Effective Specifications to Achieve Improved Energy Efficiency Standards. MASc Thesis, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  26. Scientists, U.o.C., Scientific integrity in policymaking: an investigation into the Bush Administration’s misuse of science. 2004: Union of Concerned Scientists. [Google Scholar]
  27. Baker, L. and H. Bernstein, The impact of school buildings on student health and performance. The Center for Green Schools, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hutton, P. C. (2011). “Zero Energy Schools‐Beyond Platinum.” Educational Facility Planner 45(3): 43‐46. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.