Decoupling of Economic Growth to Industrial Wastewater Discharge in the Yangtze River Delta

Zhang Kunjie

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202125102068

All issues

Volume 251 (2021)

E3S Web Conf., 251 (2021) 02068

References

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 251, 2021 2021 International Conference on Tourism, Economy and Environmental Sustainability (TEES 2021)


Article Number		02068
Number of page(s)		5
Section		Environmental Ecological Analysis and Sustainable Development Research
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125102068
Published online		15 April 2021

Jiang et al. Research on the Decoupling of Economic Growth and Industrial Water Consumption and its Driving Factors [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(11): 70–76. [Google Scholar]
Wu D., Wang Y.H. Assessment and Prospects on the Decoupling of China’s Economic Development and Water Environment Pressure [J]. Resources and Environment in The Yangtze Basin. 2013, 22(09): 1103–1109. [Google Scholar]
Ma et al. Research on the Inter-provincial Differences in the Decoupling of Industrial Wastewater Discharge and Economic Growth [J]. China Population Resources and Environment. 2017, 27(11): 185–192. [Google Scholar]
Lu et al. Innovation-driven Research on the Decoupling of Economic Growth and Industrial Wastewater Discharge - With the City Clusters in Yangtze River Delta as the Example [J]. Areal Research and Development. 2020, 39(05): 156–162. [Google Scholar]
Yu et al. Decomposition of Factors Driving Water Consumption Change in the Yangtze River Delta under Water-Energy Correlation [J]. Ecological Economy. 2021, 37(02): 159–166. [Google Scholar]
Ding et al. Change of Yangtze River Economic Belt’s Industrial Structure and its Effect on Surrounding Environment from 2000 to 2015 [J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering. 2020, 27(02): 8–16. [Google Scholar]
Tapio P., Banister D., Luukkanen J., Vehmas J., Wilamo R. Energy and transport in comparison: Immaterialisation, dematerialisation and decarbonisation in the EU15 between 1970 and 2000 [J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 35(1): 433–451. [Google Scholar]
Kilimani N., Heerden J.V., Bohlmann H., Roosl. Economy—wide impact of drought induced productivity losses [J]. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2018, 27(5), 636–648. [Google Scholar]
Zhang B., Wang B., Wang Z.H. Role of renewable energy and non—renewable energy consumption on EKC: Evidence from Pakistan [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 156(7): 855–864. [Google Scholar]
OECD. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressures from economic growth [R]. Paris: OECD, 2002. [Google Scholar]
Tapio P. Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001[J]. Transport Policy, 2005, 12(2): 137–151. [Google Scholar]
He X.Y. Research on the decoupling relationship between China’s economic growth and industrial “three wastes” emissions [D]. Harbin Engineering University, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

[1] Jiang et al. Research on the Decoupling of Economic Growth and Industrial Water Consumption and its Driving Factors [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(11): 70–76. [Google Scholar]

[2] Wu D., Wang Y.H. Assessment and Prospects on the Decoupling of China’s Economic Development and Water Environment Pressure [J]. Resources and Environment in The Yangtze Basin. 2013, 22(09): 1103–1109. [Google Scholar]

[3] Ma et al. Research on the Inter-provincial Differences in the Decoupling of Industrial Wastewater Discharge and Economic Growth [J]. China Population Resources and Environment. 2017, 27(11): 185–192. [Google Scholar]

[4] Lu et al. Innovation-driven Research on the Decoupling of Economic Growth and Industrial Wastewater Discharge - With the City Clusters in Yangtze River Delta as the Example [J]. Areal Research and Development. 2020, 39(05): 156–162. [Google Scholar]

[5] Yu et al. Decomposition of Factors Driving Water Consumption Change in the Yangtze River Delta under Water-Energy Correlation [J]. Ecological Economy. 2021, 37(02): 159–166. [Google Scholar]

[6] Ding et al. Change of Yangtze River Economic Belt’s Industrial Structure and its Effect on Surrounding Environment from 2000 to 2015 [J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering. 2020, 27(02): 8–16. [Google Scholar]

[7] Tapio P., Banister D., Luukkanen J., Vehmas J., Wilamo R. Energy and transport in comparison: Immaterialisation, dematerialisation and decarbonisation in the EU15 between 1970 and 2000 [J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 35(1): 433–451. [Google Scholar]

[8] Kilimani N., Heerden J.V., Bohlmann H., Roosl. Economy—wide impact of drought induced productivity losses [J]. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2018, 27(5), 636–648. [Google Scholar]

[9] Zhang B., Wang B., Wang Z.H. Role of renewable energy and non—renewable energy consumption on EKC: Evidence from Pakistan [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 156(7): 855–864. [Google Scholar]

[10] OECD. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressures from economic growth [R]. Paris: OECD, 2002. [Google Scholar]

[11] Tapio P. Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001[J]. Transport Policy, 2005, 12(2): 137–151. [Google Scholar]

[12] He X.Y. Research on the decoupling relationship between China’s economic growth and industrial “three wastes” emissions [D]. Harbin Engineering University, 2016. [Google Scholar]