Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
2021 International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Management (EEM 2021)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01042 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Intelligent Environmental Monitoring and Quality Technology Assessment | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125301042 | |
Published online | 06 May 2021 |
- Dollar, D. & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7: 195–225. [Google Scholar]
- Donaldson, J. A. (2008). Growth is Good for Whom, When, How? Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction in Exceptional Cases. World Development. 36(11): 2127–2143. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrik, D. (2014). The Past, Present, and Future of Economic Growth. Challenge. 57(3): 5–39. [Google Scholar]
- Kenworthy, L. (1999). Do social-welfare policies reduce poverty? A cross-national assessment. Social Forces, 77(3):1119–1139. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, W. K. M. (2001). The poor in Singapore: Issues and options. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 31(1): 57–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Øyen, E. (1996). Poverty research rethought. In E. Øyen, S. M. Miller, & S. A. Samad (Eds.), Poverty: A global review: Handbook on international poverty research. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo and Paris. pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar]
- Brady, D. (2003). Rethinking the Sociological Measurement of Poverty. Social Forces, 81(3): 715- 751. [Google Scholar]
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom, New York: Alfred A. Knoff. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(1): 252–254. [Google Scholar]
- Verba, S., Scholzman, K., Brady, H. and Nie, N. (1993) Citizen Activity: Who Participates? What Do They Say? American Political Science Review, 87(2), 303- 318. [Google Scholar]
- White, G. (1997). Social Exclusion and Anti-Poverty Policy: A Debate —Research Series110. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=710fe5caea00006a03748284f1651806&site=xueshu_se [Google Scholar]
- Manuel, C. (1992) ‘Four Asian Tigers with a Dragon Head: A Comparative Analysis of the State, Economy, and Society in the Asian Pacific Rim’, in Appelbaum, Richard P., Jeffrey, Henderson (eds), States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. Newbury Park CA: Sage, pp. 33–70. [Google Scholar]
- Chalmers, J. (1987) ‘Political Institutions and Economic Performance: The Government-Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan’, in Deyo, Frederic C. (Eds.), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY. pp. 136–64. [Google Scholar]
- Ramesh, M. (1995) Social security in South Korea and Singapore: Explaining the differences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.1995.tb00466.x [Google Scholar]
- UNDP. 2000a. Human Development Report 2000, Oxford University Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
- UNDP. 2000b. Overcoming Human Poverty: United Nations Development Programme Poverty Report 2000, United Nations Development Programme, New York. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.