Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
2021 International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Management (EEM 2021)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02054 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Big Data Environment Management Application and Industry Research | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125302054 | |
| Published online | 06 May 2021 | |
- S. K. Card, T. P. Moran, and A. Newell, The Psychology ofHuman-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- B. E. John and D. E. Kieras, “The GOMS family of userinterface analysis techniques: Comparison and contrast,” ACMTransactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 3, no. 4, pp.320–351, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- W. Jorritsma, P.-J. Haga, F. Cnossen, R. A. Dierckx, M. Oudkerk, and P.M. van Ooijen, “Predicting human performance differences on multiple interface alternatives: KLM, GOMS and CogTool are unreliable,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 3, pp. 3725–3731, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- A.D. Rice and J. W. Lartigue, “Touch-level model (TLM) evolving KLM-GOMS for touchscreen and mobile devices,” in Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Southeast regional conference, 2014, pp. 1–6. R. Nicole, “Title of paper with only first word capitalized,” J. Name Stand. Abbrev., in press. [Google Scholar]
- K. El Batran and M. D. Dunlop, “Enhancing KLM (keystroke-level model) to fit touch screen mobile devices,” in Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services, 2014, pp. 283–286. [Google Scholar]
- S. K. Card, T. P. Moran, and A. Newell, “The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 396–410, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- N. Parameshwara, J. H. Kim, W. Guo, and K. S. Pasupathy, “NGOMSL simulation model in an emergency department,” in 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 2016: IEEE, pp. 1938–1949. [Google Scholar]
- S. Lee and R. J. Koubek, “Communicative NGOMSL: Development of an evaluation method for a textbased communication system,” Int J Hum-Comput Int, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1013–1036, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- D. Kieras, “A guide to GOMS model usability evaluation using NGOMSL,” in Handbook of humancomputer interaction: Elsevier, 1997, pp. 733–766. [Google Scholar]
- W. D. Gray, B. E. John, and M. E. Atwood, “The precis of Project Ernestine or an overview of a validation of GOMS,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1992, pp. 307–312. [Google Scholar]
- C. J. Lin, T.-L. Hsieh, and S.-F. Lin, “Development of staffing evaluation principle for advanced main control room and the effect on situation awareness and mental workload,” Nucl Eng Des, vol. 265, pp. 137–144, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- C. J. Lin and T.-L. Hsieh, “Development of task analysis method for operator tasks in main control room of an advanced nuclear power plant,” J Nucl Sci Technol, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 102–111, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- P. Setthawong and R. Setthawong, “Updated Goals Operators Methods and Selection Rules (GOMS) with Touch Screen Operations for Quantitative Analysis of User Interfaces,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 258, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- C. D. Wickens, J. G. Hollands, S. Banbury, and R. Parasuraman, Engineering psychology and human performance. Psychology Press, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- J. Q. Liao and W. S. Zhang, The Reading Velocity of Chinese Characters. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38–41, 19 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.