Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
2021 International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Management (EEM 2021)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03017 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Environmental Equipment Engineering Management and its Technical Application | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125303017 | |
| Published online | 06 May 2021 | |
- H. Chesbrough. “Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning”, vol. 43, pp. 354–363, March 2010. [Google Scholar]
- M. Anwar. “Business model innovation and SMEs performance: Does competitive advantage mediate? International Journal of Innovation Management”, vol. 22, pp. 185–197, July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- R. Casadesus-Masanell, & J. Ricart, “How to design a winning business model”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 89, pp. 100–107, Feb 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- H. Zhang, E. Ko, & E. Lee, “Moderating Effects of Nationality and Product Category on the Relationship between Innovation and Customer Equity in Korea and China. Journal of Product Innovation Management”, vol. 30, pp. 110–122, Jan 2013. [Google Scholar]
- C. Baden-Fuller. & S. Haefliger, “Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Planning”, vol. 46, pp. 419–426, June 2016. [Google Scholar]
- A. Kim. & E. Ko, “Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. Journal of Business Research”, vol. 65, pp. 1480–1486, Oct 2012. [Google Scholar]
- I. Kastalli. & Van Looy, B., “Servitization: Disentangling the impact of service business model innovation on manufacturing firm performance”, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 31, pp. 169–180, April 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Sok. & A. O'Cass, “Achieving service quality through service innovation exploration-exploitation: the critical role of employee empowerment and slack resources”, Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 29, pp. 137–149, Feb 2015. [Google Scholar]
- C. Wang. & P. Ahmed, “Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda”, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 9, pp 31–51, Jan 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O. Iglesias, S. Markovic, & J. Rialp, “How does sensory brand experience influence brand equity? Considering the roles of customer satisfaction, customer affective commitment, and employee empathy”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 96, pp. 343–354, Nov 2015. [Google Scholar]
- B. Berman. “How to compete effectively against lowcost competitors”, Business Horizons, vol. 58, pp. 87–97, Jan 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. Tzokas, Y. Kim, H. Akbar, & H. Al-Dajani, “Absorptive capacity and performance: The role of customer relationship and technological capabilities in high-tech SMEs”, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 47, pp. 134–142, Dec 2015. [Google Scholar]
- A. Amini, M. Darani, M. Afshani, & Z. Amini, “Effectiveness of marketing strategies and corporate image on brand equity as a sustainable competitive advantage”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, vol. 4, pp. 192–205, Feb 2015. [Google Scholar]
- D. Mahr, A. Lievens, & V. Blazevic, “The value of customer cocreated knowledge during the innovation process”, Journal of Product Innovation Management” vol. 31, pp. 599–615, March 2014. [Google Scholar]
- K. Chatzipanagiotou, C. Veloutsou, & G. Christodoulides, “Decoding the complexity of the consumer-based brand equity process”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, pp. 5479–5486, Nov 2016. [Google Scholar]
- M. Renton, U. Daellenbach, S. Davenport, & J. Richard, “Small but sophisticated: Entrepreneurial marketing and SME approaches to brand management”, Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, vol. 17, pp. 149–164, Jan 2015. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.