Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
2021 International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Management (EEM 2021)
Article Number 03084
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environmental Equipment Engineering Management and its Technical Application
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125303084
Published online 06 May 2021
  1. Tan Xinbin, Luo Jianhe A review on the use of social media by foreign college students [J]. Education academic monthly, 2018(07):78–85. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shen, J. 2019. Social-media use and academic performance among undergraduates in biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li Huating, Wang Wei, Wang Wenting. The impact of the use of social media and its multitasking on College Students' academic achievement [J]. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES), 2018, 15(10):128–131. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jomon Aliyas Paul, Hope M. Baker, Justin Daniel Cochran. 2012. Effect of online social networking on student academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hatice Yildiz, Suleyman Sadi Seferoglu. 2020. Antecedents of Social Media Usage Status_ Examination of Predictiveness of Digital Literacy, Academic Performance, and Fear of Missing Out Variables. Social Science Quarterly. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yvonne Hong, Lesley Gardner. 2018. Undergraduates' perception and engagement in Facebook learning groups. British Journal of Educational Technology. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li Dongsheng, Xin Ying, Wei Le. The negative influence of mobile social media on college students and the countermeasures [J]. Journal of Jilin Institute of education, 2015, 31(05):136–137. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang Jie. The influence of new social media on College Students' behavior and its causes [J]. Journal of Hubei correspondence university, 2017, 30(07):15–16. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yi Lin. The influence of new media on contemporary college students in the micro era [J]. Science and technology communication, 2015, 7(08):115–116. [Google Scholar]
  10. Derbyshire, K. L., Lust, K. A., Schreiber, L. R. N., Odlaug, B. L., Christenson, G. A., Golden, D. J.,et al. 2013. Problematic internet use and associated risks in a college sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, Vol. 54. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, S. Y., Fu, Y. 2009. Internet use and academic achievement: gender differences in early adolescence. Adolescence, Vol. 44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Derbyshire, K. L., Lust, K. A., Schreiber, L. R. N., Odlaug, B. L., Christenson, G. A., Golden, D. J.,et al. 2013. Problematic internet use and associated risks in a college sample. Comprehensive Psychiatr. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ding Fengqin, Zhao Huying Is gratitude stronger for individual subjective well-being? -- a meta-analysis [J]. Advances in psychological science, 2018, 26(10): 1749–1764. [Google Scholar]
  14. Huiyoung Shin, Allison M. Ryan. 2014. Friendship Networks and Achievement Goals: An Examination of Selection and Influence Processes and Variations by Gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Allison M. Ryan. 2000. Peer Groups as a Context for the Socialization of Adolescents’ Motivation, Engagement, and Achievement in School. Educational Psychologis, Vol. 2. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sha Jingying, Zhang Xiangkui, Deng Xiaoping. Meta analysis on the homogeneity of academic achievement between adolescents and their peer groups [J]. Applied psychology, 2017, 23(04):345–354. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zheng Junjun, Liu Chunyan, Shen Xiaoliang, Shao Cong. Research on social media user participation based on use and satisfaction theory -- considering the mediating role of problem use and the moderating role of gender [J]. Technical economy, 2017, 36(01):123–129. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang Zhisong, Li Fuhua. Investigation on Internet Addiction of college students [J]. Research on teacher education, 2011, 23(02):44–48. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang Yanming, Wang Yingying Investigation on gender differences and Internet purposes of college students with internet addiction [J]. Journal of Heilongjiang University of education, 2015, 34(09): 107–108. [Google Scholar]
  20. Feng Li Investigation report on media literacy of middle school students -- taking high schools in Jiangsu, Gansu and Henan as examples [J]. Communication and copyright, 2014(11):122–123+125. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu Tianyuan Analysis of the impact of social media on the academic performance of rural teenagers -Taking the experience of X village in Guanzhong Plain as an example [J]. China Youth Research, 2018(09):70–77+30. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu Shengtao, Zhou Yang, Fu Xiaolan, Liu Xiaoqian, Liu Tianli, Zhu Tingshao. The cultural and cooperative communication pattern along the “one belt along the way”: Based on the psychological analysis of big data in social media [J]. China Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(03):298–307. [Google Scholar]
  23. Oyserman Daphna, Coon Heather, Kemmelmeier Markus. 2002. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jiang Jianhua, Liu Chengjun, Jiang Tianying. Meta analysis of the relationship between organizational learning and organizational performance: Based on the moderating effect of measurement factors and situational factors [J]. Scientific research management, 2014, 35(08):117–125. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tian Ran. Research on the influence of information overload on wechat user behavior acculturation [D]. University of Electronic Science and technology, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. Churchill Gilbert A. 1979. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wade C., Jacobsen, B.S., and Renata Forste, Ph.D. 2011. The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students. Cyberpsychology. Behavior and Social Networking, Vol. 14. [Google Scholar]
  28. Barker, V. 2009. Older adolescents' motivations for social network site use:The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. Cyber Psychology Behavior, Vol 12. [Google Scholar]
  29. Qu Lixin, Liu Fengjuan Research on mobile terminal use and classroom learning preference based on gender differences -- Taking the results of College Students' online questionnaire as an example [J]. Financial theory and teaching, 2018(06):81–84. [Google Scholar]
  30. Song Xianwen Investigation and analysis of gender differences in college students' Online Autonomous Learning [J]. Education and teaching forum, 2014(02):172–173. [Google Scholar]
  31. YAN Dan. Research on the characteristics of College Students' network behavior and education guidance [D]. Chang'an University, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li Wei, Xu Lingling Comparison of youth social media applications between China and the United States [J]. People's forum, 2015(36):244–246. [Google Scholar]
  33. Guo Ying, He Xiangcai. The relationship between social support and mobile phone dependence of college students: a meta-analysis based on Chinese samples [J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2017, 44(06):91–101. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang Na, Ren Ting Research on information overload and personalized recommendation mechanism in mobile social networking sites [J]. Intelligence magazine, 2015, 34(08):190–194+176. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li Yuanwen. Characteristics and relationship between peer attachment and loneliness of Internet and mobile phone addicted adolescents [D]. Central China Normal University, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bi Xiangyang Gender differences in Internet addiction among college students: analysis of multiple mediating effects based on Internet use preference [J]. Xuehai, 2016(04):134–142. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.