Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 255, 2021
International Conference on Sustainable, Circular Management and Environmental Engineering (ISCMEE 2021)
Article Number 01044
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125501044
Published online 03 May 2021
  1. Voron, V.P. (2011). Trees and shrubs of Ukraine: an atlas for practical classes on dendrology. A New Word. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barabash, O.V., Lozova, T.M., & Kozlova, T.A. (2018). Assessment of antropogenic influence intensity by the level of fluctuation asymmetry of morphological structures. Biology and Ecology, 4, 66-72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1318179 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ganzha, D. (2012). Morphological response of poplar leaves in a variety conditions of anthropogenic load. Visnyk of the Lviv University Series Biology, 60, 163-170. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zoryna, A.A. (2012). Methods of statistical analysis of fluctuating asymmetry. Principles of the Ecology, 3(3), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.15393/j1.art.2012.1461 [Google Scholar]
  5. Zverev, V., Lama, A., & Kozlov, M. (2018). Fluctuating asymmetry of birch leaves did not increase with pollution and drought stress in a controlled experiment. Ecolological Indicators, 84, 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.05 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ivanchenko, O.E., & Bessonova, V.P. (2016). Indication of the condition of woody plants in the parks of Dnipropetrovsk by morphophysiological indicators. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University, Biology, Ecology, 26(1), 109-118. [Google Scholar]
  7. Krupey, K., Obruch, K., & Mihailichenko, A. (2019). Phytoindication of the environmental conditions by the degree of leaves damage of Betula pendula Roth. Problems of Bioindications and Ecolology, 24(2), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.26661/2312-2056/2019-24/2-06 [Google Scholar]
  8. Leung, B., Forbes, М.R., & Houle, D. (2000). Fluctuating asymmetry as a bioindicator of stress: comparing efficacy of analyses involving multiple traits. The American Naturalist, 155(1), 101 – 115. https://doi.org/10.1086/303298 [Google Scholar]
  9. Lutsyshyn, O.G., Radchenko, V.G., Palapa N.V., & others. (2010). Macromorphological changes of reaction-response of plant organisms of tree street plantings of Kyiv metropolis at stress level of technogenic pollution. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 6, 180-187. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mylen’ka, M.M. (2009). Bioindication assessment of the ecological condition of the Burshtyn urban ecosystem. Doctoral dissertation, Dnipropetrovsk National University named after O. Gonchar. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nesplyak, O.S. (2011). Ecological peculiarities of asheslag dumps’ flora and vegetation of Burshtynska thermal electric power station and their using in recultivation. Doctoral dissertation, Dnipropetrovsk National University named after O. Gonchar. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pliatsuk, D.L. (2015). Integrated express-evaluation of air quality under changing industrial infrastructure of the region. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(6), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.43753 [Google Scholar]
  13. Pryimak, O.P., Pugach, A.N. (2012). Effect of motor vehicle emission on assimilative apparatus of decorative ornamental plants. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 3(1), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.15421/021217 [Google Scholar]
  14. Pryimak, O.P. (2012). Phytotoxic effect of SO2, NO2 and lead ions on the vegetative organs of decorative plants. Biosystems Diversity, 20(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.15421/011211 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sandner, T.M., Zverev, V., Kozlov, M.V. (2019). Can the use of landmarks improve the suitability of fluctuating asymmetry in plant leaves as an indicator of stress. Ecolological indicators, 97, 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.038 [Google Scholar]
  16. Skliarenko, A.V. (2019). Assessing the impact of industrial conditions on the level of fluctuating asymmetry of the Betula pendula leaf blade in the city of Zaporizhzhya. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 29(6), 54-57. https://doi.org/10.15421/40290611 [Google Scholar]
  17. Semak, U.Y. (2020). Variation in leaf morphological traits of Populus tremula L. under the conditions of technogenic load. Visnyk of the Lviv University, Series Biology, 82, 121-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vlubs.2020.82.10 [Google Scholar]
  18. Semak, U.Y. (2020). The influence of technologically transformed environment factors on the level of fluctuation asymmetry of tree plants leaves blades. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod University. Series Biology, 48, 28-33. https://doi.org/10.24144/1998-6475.2020.48.28-33 [Google Scholar]
  19. Yusypiva, T.,Miasoid, H. (2019). The state of bio-ecological characteristics of the one-year shoot of Robinia pseudoacacia L. under the conditions of industrial pollution. Ekologia, 38(3), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2019-0019 [Google Scholar]
  20. Yusypiva, T.I., Zadesenets, A.O., Karas, A.V. (2019). Variability of morphometric characteristics of Betula pendula lamina under technogenic conditions of Dnipro city. Ecology and Noospherology, 30(2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.15421/031912 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.