Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 256, 2021
2021 International Conference on Power System and Energy Internet (PoSEI2021)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 5
Section Smart Grid Technology and Power System Regulation Modeling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125601013
Published online 10 May 2021
  1. Wang Yanling, Wu Mengkai, Zhou Ziqing, Ma Hongyu. Quantitative analysis model of power load influencing factors based on improved gray correlation[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(06):1772–1778. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nie Xinwei, Shi Dan, Lin Tong. Analysis of the impact of the new coronavirus epidemic on my country’s power industry[J]. China Energy, 2020,42 (02):25–31+14. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Ghamkhari, H. Mohsenian-Rad and A. Wierman, “Optimal risk-aware power procurement for data centers in day-ahead and real-time electricity markets,” 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Toronto, ON, 2014, pp. 610-615. [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Zhang, J. Guo, Z. Liu, J. Chen, F. Song and H. Zhang, “A smart collaborative structure for information centric retail electricity market,” 2017 7th IEEE International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (ICEIEC), Macau, 2017, pp. 369-372. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zheng Yanchong, Yu Hang, Shao Ziyun, Jian Linni. Day-ahead bidding strategy for electric vehicle aggregator enabling multiple agent modes in uncertain electricity markets[J]. Applied Energy,2020,280. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mahdi Behrangrad. A review of demand side management business models in the electricity market[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 47. [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Ge, K. Li, F. Wang and Z. Mi, “Day-ahead Market Optimal Bidding Strategy and Quantitative Compensation Mechanism Design for Load Aggregator Engaging Demand Response,” 2019 IEEE/IAS 55th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS), Calgary, AB, Canada, 2019, pp. 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Q. Tang, X. Wu, S. Dong and R. Ma, “Framework Design of Load Aggregators Participating in Electricity Market,” 2018 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), Beijing, 2018, pp. 1-6. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu Haoliang, Jin Panrun, Jiang Jiheng, Lu Zongxiang, Qiao Ying. Optimization Method for Power Generation Rights Transaction to Promote Wind Power Consumption[J]. China Electric Power, 2020, 53(03):167–176. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu Chuang, Li Fengting, Chao Qin, Wang Xinghao. A new model of multilateral power generation rights trading considering clean energy consumption[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021,41(01):92-98. [Google Scholar]
  11. Junhong Guo, Ling Li, Yajie Li, Jingya Su. Analysis on Market Potential of Generation-side Contract Electricity Transfer Transaction [A]. In: 2020 IEEE 4th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2) [C]. Wuhan China: IEEE,2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang Wei, Zeng Zhijian, Chen Haoyong, Wang Fang, Guo Manlan. Research on Guangdong Electricity Market Demand Side Response Transaction Mechanism[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2017,30(05):25-34+68. [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Kang and H. Kim, “Preserving privacy with anonymity for customer collaboration in smart grid,” 2012 18th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), Jeju Island, 2012, pp. 724729, doi: 10.1109/APCC.2012.6388290. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao Ciwei, Li Qianyu, Song Hongkun. A new mechanism for orderly electricity consumption based on electricity rights trading[J]. Electricity Demand Side Management, 2013,15(03):5-10. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.