EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 257 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 257 (2021) 01008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 257, 2021
5th International Workshop on Advances in Energy Science and Environment Engineering (AESEE 2021)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 9
Section Energy Chemistry and Energy Storage and Save Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125701008
Published online 12 May 2021
  1. Liu Xiaoyong, Wang Xiu-Bin, Li Shu-Tian (2019). Phosphorus loading rates from livestock and poultry faeces, and environmental evaluation in China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 38 (11) : 2594-2608. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, Y.F., Mayilai, A.N., Tang, S.Z., et al (2020). Pollution of Livestock and Poultry Feces and Counter Measures[J]. Grass-Feeding Livestock, 4:47-49 [Google Scholar]
  3. Tsai, W. T., & Lin, C.I. (2009). Overview analysis of bioenergy from livestock manure management in Taiwan. Overview analysis of bioenergy from livestock manure management in Taiwanenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2682-2688. [Google Scholar]
  4. Loyon, L. (2017). Overview of manure treatment in France. Overview of manure treatment in Franceaste management, 61, 516-520. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, T., Bu M. D., & Geng, W. (2012). Pollution status and biogas-producing potential of livestock and poultry excrements in China. Pollution status and biogas-producing potential of livestock and poultry excrements in Chinahinese Journal of Ecology, 31(5), 1241. [Google Scholar]
  6. Senesi, N. (1989). Composted materials as organic fertilizers. Composted materials as organic fertilizerscience of the Total Environment, 81, 521-542. [Google Scholar]
  7. Thu, C.T.T., Cuong, P. H., Van Chao, N., Trach, N. X., & Sommer, S. G. (2012). Manure management practices on biogas and non-biogas pig farms in developing countries–using livestock farms in Vietnam as an example. Manure management practices on biogas and non-biogas pig farms in developing countries–using livestock farms in Vietnam as an exampleournal of Cleaner Production, 27, 64-71. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng Dongle, Ngo Huu Hao, Guo Wenshan, Lee Duujong, Nghiem Duc Long, Zhang Jian, Liang Shuang, Varjani Sunita, Wang Jie. Performance of microbial fuel cell for treating swine wastewater containing sulfonamide antibiotics.[J]. Bioresource technology, 2020, 311. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sofia Babanova, Jason Jones, Sujal Phadke, (2019). Continuous Flow, Large‐Scale, Microbial Fuel Cell System for the Sustained Treatment of Swine Waste. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, K. Y., Yang, W., Evans, P. J., & Logan, B. E. (2016). Continuous treatment of high strength wastewaters using air‐cathode microbial fuel cells. Continuous treatment of high strength wastewaters using air‐cathode microbial fuel cellsioresource Technology, 221, 96–101. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhuang, L., Yuan, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhou, S. (2012). Long‐term evaluation of a 10‐liter serpentine‐type microbial fuel cell stack treating brewery wastewater. Long‐term evaluation of a 10‐liter serpentine‐type microbial fuel cell stack treating brewery wastewaterioresource Technology, 123, 406–412. [Google Scholar]
  12. S.B. Velasquez-Orta, E. Yu, K.P. Katuri, I.M. Head, T.P. Curtis, K. Scott, Evaluation of hydrolysis and fermentation rates in microbial fuel cells, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 90 (2011) 789–798. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Montpart, L. Rago, J.A. Baeza, A. Guisasola, Hydrogen production in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells with different complex substrates, Water Res. 68 (2015) 601–615. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Cerrillo, J. Oliveras, M. Vi˜nas, A. Bonmatí, Comparative assessment of raw and digested pig slurry treatment in bioelectrochemical systems, Bioelectrochemistry 110 (2016) 69–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. X. Han, Y. Qu, D. Li, Y. Dong, D. Chen, Y. Yu, N. Ren, Y. Feng, Combined microbial electrolysis cell– iron-air battery system for hydrogen production and swine wastewater treatment, Process Biochemistry 101 (2021) 104–110 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuntke, P., Smiech, K. M., Bruning, H., Zeeman, G., Saakes, M., Sleutels, T. H., Hamelers, H. V., & Buisman, C. J. (2012). Ammonium recovery and energy production from urine by a microbial fuel cell. Ammonium recovery and energy production from urine by a microbial fuel cellater Research, 46(8), 2627-2636. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, X., Cai, Z., Zhou, Q., Zhang, Z., & Chen, C. (2012). Bioelectrochemical stimulation of petroleum hydrocarbon degradation in saline soil using U-tube microbial fuel cells. Bioelectrochemical stimulation of petroleum hydrocarbon degradation in saline soil using U-tube microbial fuel cellsiotechnology and Bioengineering, 109(2), 426-433. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu, T., Zhu, G., Jha, A. K., Zou, R., Liu, L., Huang, X., & Liu, C. (2013). Hydrogen production with effluent from an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) using a single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell (MEC). Hydrogen production with effluent from an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) using a single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell (MEC)nternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(25), 11117-11123. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheng, S., & Logan, B. E. (2011). High hydrogen production rate of microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) with reduced electrode spacing. High hydrogen production rate of microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) with reduced electrode spacingioresour Technology, 102(3), 3571-3574. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, I. S., Hwang, M. H., Jang, N. J., Hyun, S. H., & Lee, S. T. (2004). Effect of low pH on the activity of hydrogen utilizing methanogen in bio-hydrogen process. Effect of low pH on the activity of hydrogen utilizing methanogen in bio-hydrogen processnternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29(11), 1133-1140. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.