EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 257 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 257 (2021) 02047 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 257, 2021
5th International Workshop on Advances in Energy Science and Environment Engineering (AESEE 2021)
Article Number 02047
Number of page(s) 5
Section Research on Energy Consumption and Energy Industry Benefit
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125702047
Published online 12 May 2021
  1. Cottrell Jr, Benjamin H. “Improving night work zone traffic control.” [R]. Virginia Transportation Research Council, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, K., and M. Hassan. “Crash severity analysis of nighttime and daytime highway work zone crashes.” PLOS ONE 14 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  3. Li Y, and Yong B. “Highway work zone risk factors and their impact on crash severity.” Journal of Transportation engineering 135. 10 (2009): 694-701. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Meng X, Xu H, Shi Y. “Identification of Rear-end Collision Risk on Freeway Work Zone and Its Prominent Influencing Factors.” Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development 29. 12 (2013): 133-138. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Sze, N. N., and Ziqi Song. “Factors contributing to injury severity in work zone related crashes in New Zealand.” International journal of sustainable transportation 13.2 (2019): 148-154. [Google Scholar]
  6. Higa, Lance, and Jin-Lee Kim. “Evaluating accident data for the safety of nighttime construction in Southern California.” ICSDEC 2012: Developing the Frontier of Sustainable Design, Engineering, and Construction. (2013): 711-718. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wei X, Shu X, Huang B, et al. Analyzing traffic crash severity in work zones under different light conditions[J]. Journal of advanced transportation, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu B, Xu H, and Dai T. “Identifying Safety Factors on Highway Work Zone Based on DEMATEL and ISM.” Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology 10.5 (2010): 130-136. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu J, Liu E, Guo H. “Research on Risk Evaluation Model of Construction Processes in Mountain Area Highways.” Journal of China & Foreign Highway 39.03 (2019):313-317. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Rahman M M, Strawderman L, Garrison T, et al. Work zone sign design for increased driver compliance and worker safety[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention 106 (2017): 67-75. [Google Scholar]
  11. Anitha G, Priya S B. Posture based health monitoring and unusual behavior recognition system for elderly using dynamic Bayesian network[J]. Cluster Computing, 22.6 (2019): 13583-13590. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sarshar, P., J. Radianti, and J. J. Gonzalez. “Modeling panic in ship fire evacuation using dynamic Bayesian network.” Third International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology IEEE, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Khan, Bushra, Faisal Khan, and Brian Veitch. “A Dynamic Bayesian Network model for ship-ice collision risk in the Arctic waters.” Safety Science 130 (2020): 104858. [Google Scholar]
  14. BayesFusion, GeNIe. Retrieved from http://www.bayesfusion.com, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  15. Oniśko, A. “Application of dynamic Bayesian netwo rks to risk assessmnet in medicine.” Zeszyty Nauko we Politechniki Białostockiej. Application of dynamic Bayesian netwo rks to risk assessmnet in medicine.” Zeszyty Nauko we Politechniki Białostockiejnformatyka 5 (2010): 35-49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Patt, A. G., and D. P. Schrag. “Using Specific Langu age to Describe Risk and Probability.” Climatic Cha nge 61.1 (2003):17-30. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liao, F., Liang, M., Li, Z., Hu, X., Song, S.. “Evalua te the malignancy of pulmonary nodules using the 3d deep leaky noisy-or network.” IEEE transactions o n neural networks and learning systems 30.11 (2019): 3484-3495. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.