EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 257 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 257 (2021) 02080 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 257, 2021
5th International Workshop on Advances in Energy Science and Environment Engineering (AESEE 2021)
Article Number 02080
Number of page(s) 6
Section Research on Energy Consumption and Energy Industry Benefit
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125702080
Published online 12 May 2021
  1. IATA. Safety Report 2019. International Air Transport Association: Montreal-Geneva; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, L.. (2017). Effects of flare operation on landing safety: a study based on Anova of real flight data. Effects of flare operation on landing safety: a study based on Anova of real flight dataafety Science, 102 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu, C., Zhou, S. H., Xie, Y., & Chang, W. B.. (2016). The study on hard landing prediction model with optimized parameter SVM method. The study on hard landing prediction model with optimized parameter SVM methodontrol Conference. IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, L., Wu, C., & Sun, R.. (2014). An analysis of flight quick access recorder (qar) data and its applications in preventing landing incidents. An analysis of flight quick access recorder (qar) data and its applications in preventing landing incidentseliability Engineering & System Safety, 127, 86-96. [Google Scholar]
  5. C.E. Dole, J.E. LewisJr, J.R. Badick, B.A. Johnson, Flight Theory and Aerodynamics: A Practical Guide for Operational Safety, John Wiley & Sons, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Witte. R. Roll, J. Biele, S. Ulamec, E. Jurado, Rosetta lander Philae-Landing performance and touchdown safety assessment, Acta Astronaut. 125 (2016) 149-160. [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Trawny, A. Huertas, M.E. Luna, C.Y. Villalpando, K.E. Martin, J.M. Carson, A.E. Johnson, C. Restrepo, V.E. Roback, Flight testing a real-time hazard detection system for safe lunar landing on the rocketpowered morpheus vehicle, in: Proc. of AlAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Li, R. Hansman, R. Palacios, R. Welsch, Anomaly detection via a Gaussian Mixture Model for flight operation and safety monitoring, Transp. Res. C64 (2016) 45-57. [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Dai, J. Tian, An analysis method of landing safety based on rough set theory. in: Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, RAMS, 2012 Proceedings Annual, IEEE, 2012. pp. 1-6. [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Yi, S. Zhang, L Xueqing, A hazard analysis-based approach to improve the landing safety of a BWB remotely piloted vehicle, Chin. J. Aeronaut. 25(6)(2012) 846-853. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Patterson, S. McClean, P. Morrow, G. Parr, Modelling safe landing zone detection options to assist in safety critical UAV decision making. Procedia Comput. Sci. 10 (2012) 1146-1151. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Holmes, P. Sartor, S. Reed, P. Southern, K. Worden, E. Cross, Prediction of landing gear loads using machine learning techniques, Struct. Health Monit. 15(5)(2016) 568-582. [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Cross, P. Sartor, K. Worden, P. Southern, Prediction of landing gear loads from flight test data using Gaussian process regression, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop in Structural Health Monitoring, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Herrema, V. Treve, R. Curran, H. Visser, Evaluation of feasible machine learn-ing techniques for predicting the time to fly and aircraft speed profile on final approach, in: International Conference for Research in Air Transportation, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Nanduri, L. Sherry, Anomaly detection in aircraft data using Recurrent Neural Networks(RNN), in: Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance, ICNS, 2016, IEEE, 2016, pp.5C2-1. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lei, W., Wu, C., Sun, R., & Cui, Z.. (2014). An Analysis of Hard Landing Incidents Based on Flight QAR Data. An Analysis of Hard Landing Incidents Based on Flight QAR Datanternational Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu J., Zhang L.. Analysis of civil aviation hard landing events based on improved bow tie model. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2016, 34 (4): 57-62 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, C., Zhou, S. H., Xie, Y., & Chang, W. B.. (2016). The study on hard landing prediction model with optimized parameter SVM method. The study on hard landing prediction model with optimized parameter SVM methodontrol Conference. IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  19. Qiao, X., Chang, W., Zhou, S., & Lu, X.. (2016). A prediction model of hard landing based on RBF neural network with K-means clustering algorithm. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). A prediction model of hard landing based on RBF neural network with K-means clustering algorithm. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chao, T., Xiang, Y., Li, J., Zhu, T., Lv, R., & Liang, S., et al. (2018). An innovative deep architecture for aircraft hard landing prediction based on time-series sensor data. An innovative deep architecture for aircraft hard landing prediction based on time-series sensor datapplied Soft Computing, 73, S1568494618304654-. [Google Scholar]
  21. Breiman, L.. (2001). Mach. Machearn. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32. [Google Scholar]
  22. Speiser, J. L., Durkalski, V. L., & Lee, W. M.. (2015). Random forest classification of etiologies for an orphan disease. Random forest classification of etiologies for an orphan diseasetatistics in Medicine, 34(5). [Google Scholar]
  23. Fernandez-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S., & Amorim, D.. (2014). Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?. Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?ournal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 3133-3181. [Google Scholar]
  24. Molloy, G. J., & O??Boyle, C. A.. (2005). The shel model: a useful tool for analyzing and teaching the contribution of human factors to medical error. The shel model: a useful tool for analyzing and teaching the contribution of human factors to medical errorcademic Medicine Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 80(2), 152-5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ac-121/135-fs-2012-45r1. Implementation and management of Flight Operational Quality Assurance (FOQA)[S]. 2015. 6. 30: 20. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fang, K.N., Wu, J.B., Zhu, J.P.. Review of random forest method. Statistics & Information Forum, 2011, 26(003):32-38. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.