Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 259, 2021
2021 12th International Conference on Environmental Science and Development (ICESD 2021)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environmental Monitoring and Ecosystem Protection
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125901007
Published online 12 May 2021
  1. A. Balmford, R. Green, Phalan, B., Proc. R. Soc. B. 279, 2714–2724 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  2. J.M. Ochoa-Quintero, T.A. Gardner, I. Rosa, S.F. Barros Ferraz, W.J. Sutherland, Conserv. Biol. 29, 440–451 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. P.A. Ferreira, D. Boscolo, B.F. Viana, Ecol. Indic. 31, 35–40 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. D.M.G. Rigueira, P.L.B. da Rocha, E. Mariano-Neto, Biodivers. Conserv. 22, 3141–3163 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. C.J. Vörösmarty, P.B. McIntyre, M.O. Gessner, D. Dudgeon, A. Prusevich, P. Green, P.M. Davies, Nature 467, 555–561 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. M.E. Rodrigues, F. de Oliveira Roque, J.M.O. Quintero, J.C. de Castro Pena, D.C. de Sousa, P.D.M. Junior, Biol. Conserv. 194, 113–120 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Doledec, N. Phillips, C. Townsend, Freshw. Biol. 56, 1670–1688 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  8. A.D. Barnosky, E.A. Hadly, J. Bascompte, E.L. Berlow, J.H. Brown, M. Fortelius, N.D. Martinez, Nature 486, 52–58 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Matthews, B. Reeze, C.K. Feld, A.J. Hendriks, Hydrobiologia 655, 1–14 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. M.A. Palmer, H.L. Menninger, E. Bernhardt, Freshw. Biol. 55, 205–222 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  11. M.E. Baker, R.S. King, Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 25–37 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Kail, J. Arle, S.C. Jähnig, Ecol. Iindic. 18, 63–72 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  13. B.G. Justus, J.C. Petersen, S.R. Femmer, J.V. Davis, J.E. Wallace, Ecol. Indic. 10, 627–638 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  14. W.K. Dodds, W.H. Clements, K. Gido, R.H. Hilderbrand, R.S. King, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 29, 988–997 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  15. W.E. Penning, M. Mjelde, B. Dudley, S. Hellsten, J. Hanganu, A. Kolada, F. Ecke, Aquat. Ecol. 42, 237251 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Delgado, I. Pardo, L. Garcia, Ecol. Indic. 15, 131139 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. M.D. Wildsmith, T.H. Rose, I.C. Potter, R.M. Warwick, K.R. Clarke, Mar. Pollut Bull. 62, 525–538 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Liu, W. Kuang, Z. Zhang, X. Xu, Y. Qin, J. Ning, S. Wu, J. Geogr. Sci. 24, 195–210 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  19. X.D. Qu, Z.G. Liu, Y. Zhang, Ecol. Sinica. 32, 4661–4672 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Kong, W. Meng, Y. Zhang, C. Gippel, X. Qu, Ecol. Res. 28, 581–592 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  21. National Environmental Protection Bureau, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (China Environmental Science Publish Press, Beijing, 2002). [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Leps, P. Smilauer, Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO (Cambridge university press, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  23. A.F. Zuur, E.N. Ieno, N.J. Walker, A.A. Saveliev, G.M. Smith, Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer, New York, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  24. R.S. King, M.E. Baker, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 29, 998–1008 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  25. E.S. Bernhardt, B.D. Lutz, R.S. King, J.P. Fay, C.E. Carter, A.M. Helton, D. Campagna, J. Amos, Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 8115–8122 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  26. S.M. Cormier, G.W. Suter, L.L. Yuan, L. Zheng, A field-based aquatic life benchmark for conductivity in central Appalachian streams (EPA/600/R-10, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Banks-Leite, R. Pardini, L.R. Tambosi, W.D. Pearse, A.A. Bueno, R.T. Bruscagin, J.P. Metzger, Science 345, 1041–1045 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Cardoso, F. Rigal, S. Fattorini, S. Terzopoulou, P.A. Borges, PLOS ONE 8, e63294 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  29. M.M. Lima, E. Mariano-Neto, Forest. Ecol. Manag. 312, 260–270 (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.