EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 262 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 262 (2021) 02025 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 262, 2021
1st International Scientific and Practical Conference “lnnovative Technologies in Environmental Engineering and Agroecosystems” (ITEEA 2021)
Article Number 02025
Number of page(s) 8
Section Basic and Applied Research in Zooengineering and Veterinary Medicine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126202025
Published online 24 May 2021
  1. S.V. Cherepanov, Topical issues of breeding work in the poultry industry in Russia, Poultry farming, 9, 2-4 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. A.V. Egorova, The main directions of work with meat chickens of the parent herd, Poultry farming, 3, 16-21 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Cherepanov, O. Stanishevskaya, Preservation and usage of genetic resources in farm poultry, The Proc. XXV World’s Poultry Cong., 343 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. Ya. S. Roiter, A.V. Egorova, A.P. Konopleva, et al., Selection and breeding work in poultry farming (2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. I. L. Galpern, V.V. Sinichkin, O. I. Stanishevskaya, A.G. Bychaev, E.S. Fedorova, Acceleration of the rate of genetic progress of the productive traits of egg and meat chickens (2009) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. V. Egorova, E. Zh. V. Manuylova, D. N. Efimov, L. I. Tuchemskiy, Evaluation of meat hens of the original lines of a selection herd by growth rate, Poultry farming, 6, 8-13 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. A.V. Egorova, L.V. Shakhnova, Separation of autosex meat chickens by sex, Poultry and Poultry Products, 3, 43 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Petrukovich, Separate growing of broilers, Livestock Russia, 12, 11-12 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. D. N. Efimov, Zh.V. Emanuylova, E. V. Zhuravleva, A.V. Egorova, V. I. Fisinin, Ag-ricultural Biology, 53,1162-1168 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. O. W. Willems, S. P. Miller, B. J. Wood, World’s Poultry Science J., 69(1), 77-78 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Bu, G. Huang, H. Fu, J. Li, S. Huang, Y. Wang, J. Mol. Endocrinol, 51, 261-276 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Cerit, K. Avanus, Turk.J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 31(6), 371-374 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Cerit, K. Avanus, World’s Poultry Science J., 63(1), 91-99 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  14. L.G. Korshunova, Transgenesis and gene expression in poultry: summary of thesis (2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Lessells, C. Mateman, Molecular Ecology, 7(2),187-195 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Zhao, J. Yao F. Li, Z. Yang, et al., Poultry Sci., 95(7), 1498-1503 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. Ya. I. Alekseev, A. M. Borodin, A. V. Nikulin, Zh. V. Emanuilov, D. N. Efimov, V. I. Fisinin, Agricultural Biology, 52(2), 367-373 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Korshunova, Y. Royter, A. Egorova, The usage of gene modifiers in selection of new forms of color- and feather-sex poultry, Proc. XIV European Poultry Conf., 512 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Roiter, A. Egorova, A. Sevastianova, L. Korshunova, The selection of autosex inter-linear forms of poultry (chicken, geese, Guinea fow), Proc. XXV World’s Poultry Congress, 257 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  20. P. K. Bramwell, Sexing chicks in the backyard flock, The Poultry Site, http://www.the poultry site.com/ [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. H. Cheng, T. E. Kuo, D. N. Lee, C. F. Weng, Zoological Studies, 45, 104-113 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  22. D. A. Dawson, S. Darby, F. M. Hunter, A. P. Krupa, I. L. Jones, T. A. Burke, Molecu-lar Ecology Notes, 1(13), 201-204 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Ellegren Hens, EMBO Reports, 2(3), 192-196 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  24. I. A. Egorov, V. A. Manukyan, T. M. Okolelova, et al., Guide to feeding agricultural bird / Under (2018) [Google Scholar]
  25. V. S. Lukashenko, M. A. Lysenko, T. A. Stollyar, A. Sh. Kavtarashvili, V. V. Dyachkovskaya, A. I. Kalashnikov, Methods of anatomical cutting of carcasses, organoleptic assessment of the quality of meat and eggs of poultry and morphology of eggs (2013) [Google Scholar]
  26. O. S. Kotlyarova, Characteristics of immunomorphological and biochemical parame-ters of broilers in ontogenesis in conditions of industrial poultry farming in Western Siberia (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. S. A. Ermolina, K. V. Buldakova, V. A. Sozinov, Successes of modern natural science, 9, 34-37 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  28. A. G. Koschaev, Biotechnology of production and use of functional feed additives for poultry (2008) [Google Scholar]
  29. X. Yang, J. Zhuang, K. Rao, X. Li, R. Zhao, Res. Vet. Sci. Dec., 89(3), 438-444 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  30. E. A. Nazarova, Physiological and biochemical status and productive qualities of broiler chickens with the combined use of lactoamilovorin and sodium selenite (2012) [Google Scholar]
  31. T. O. Azarnova, M. Naydensky, A. Bobylkova, Hypothesis of early development of embryos, Cattle breeding in Russia, 7(13), 1-5 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  32. I. A. Egorov, A. A. Grozina, V.G. Vertiprakhov, T.N. Lenkova, V. A. Manukyan, T. V. Egorova, M. V. Koshcheeva, Agricultural biology, 53(4), 820-830 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  33. B.I. Kuznik, Physiology and pathology of the blood system (2002) [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Piotrowsska, K. Burlikowska, R. Szymeczko, Folia biologica Krakow, 59(3-4), 18 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  35. I. A. Egorov, T. N. Lenkova, V. A. Manukyan, et al., Physiological and microbiologi-cal features of digestion chickens of meat breeds in the embryonic and postembryonic periods to create new feeding technologies that ensure the fullest possible realization of the genetic potential of the bird (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.