Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 263, 2021
XXIV International Scientific Conference “Construction the Formation of Living Environment” (FORM-2021)
Article Number 05018
Number of page(s) 11
Section Global Environmental Challenges
Published online 28 May 2021
  1. N. V. Bakaeva, , A. Yu. Natarova, & A. Yu. Igin, Criteria for Assessing the Ecological Characteristics of Residential and Public Buildings Based on the Concept of “Green” Construction. Bulletin of the South-West State University, 21 (1), 57-68, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. V. I. Telichenko, “Green” technologies of the living environment: concepts, terms, standards. MGSU Bulletin, 12 (4 (103)), pp. 364-372, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  3. Ya. A. Rogacheva, Substantiation of the essence and criteria of “Green building”. Modern construction and architecture, 1 (01), pp. 47-49, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  4. Zh. V. Vasilieva, & S. Yu. Buryachenko, Basic principles of the concept of “green building”. Proceedings of higher educational institutions. Arctic region, 1, pp. 12-15, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. A. Benuzh, & M. A. Kolchigin, Analysis of the concept of green building as a mechanism to ensure the environmental safety of construction activities. MGSU Bulletin, 12, pp. 161-165, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Ravasio, R. Riise, & S. E. Sveen, Green Buildings in the Arctic region: a literature review. E3S Web of Conferences, 172, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  7. V. I. Tomakov, & M. V. Tomakov, Green building in the concept of sustainable development of Russian cities. Bulletin of the South-West State University, 21 (2), pp. 16-31, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. K. V. Chepeleva, O. S. Nikitina, S. A. Shatrova, & N. V. Anufriev, Development of green building in the Russian Federation. The Age of Science, 8, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. V. A. Nikiforova, E.A. Vidishcheva, A. A. Nikiforova, & D. D. Vidishcheva, Features of the use of modern environmental technologies in construction activities. Systems. Methods. Technology, 4, pp. 209-218, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  10. A. A. Kuzmenkov, I. M. Karachentseva, S. Y. Buryachenko, Justification of wall material choice of the experimental building for implementation of the international project KO 1089 “Green Arctic Building” – GraB. Wooden low-rise housing: economics, architecture and resource-saving technologies, pp. 106-111, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Y. Buryachenko, I. M. Karachentseva, Z. A. Voronin, A. A. Kuzmenkov, The influence of enclosing structures of walls on the energy efficiency of a wooden building (on the example of the international project KO 1089 “Green Arctic Building”). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 539 (1), p. 012024, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. I. M. Karachentseva, A. A. Kuzmenkov, Justification of the choice of engineering support systems for an experimental low-rise wooden building. / Resource-saving technologies, materials and structures, pp. 36-43, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. A. Kuzmenkov, I. M. Karachentseva, A. V. Derbenev, Construction of an experimental wooden low-rise building. Wooden low-rise housing: economics, architecture and resource-saving technologies, pp. 32-50, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. D. A. Kuvshinov, A. A. Kuzmenkov, Air temperature and humidity monitoring system for an experimental timber frame house. In European research, 7, pp. 36-40, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  15. D. A. Kuvshinov, Testing the air temperature and relative humidity monitoring system in the experimental wooden house. Wooden low-rise housing: economics, architecture and resource-saving technologies, pp. 51-58, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Petrovic, J. A. Myhren, X. Zhang, M. Wallhagen, & O. Eriksson, Life cycle assessment of a wooden single-family house in Sweden. Applied Energy, 251, p. 113253, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Petrovic, J. A. Myhren, X. Zhang, M. Wallhagen, & O. Eriksson, Life cycle assessment of building materials for a single-family house in Sweden. Energy Procedia, 158, pp. 3547-3552, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Pastori, Z. Borchok, & G. A. Gorbacheva, CO2 balance of different types of wall structures. Building materials, 12, pp. 76-77, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Fedorik, H. Lahtinen, H. Koivurova and A. H. Niemi, Comparison of hygrothermal simulation techniques in northern conditions. Proceedings of NSCM 32: The 32nd Nordic Seminar on Computational Mechanics, pp. 62-67, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. B. R. Sørensen, R. Riise, Some Issues of Energy Performance and Management of Residential Buildings in Norway and North-west Russia. 2014 International Conference on Mechanics and Civil Engineering (icmce-14), pp. 1052-1057, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. Xu. Yizhong, M. Mustafa, R. K. Calay, B. R. Sørensen, Numerical study on the ventilation performance of a livestock house built in porous panels in Cold Regions. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 700(1), p. 012026, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Nadeem, Y. Abzhanov, S. Tokbolat, M. Mustafa, B. R. Sørensen, The Impacts of Climate Zone, Wall Insulation, and Window Types on Building Energy Performance. Joint International Conference on Design and Construction of Smart City Components, pp. 270-277, Springer, Cham, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  23. M. I. Zaitseva, S. N. Koshelev, A. A. Kuzmenkov, An integrated approach to the construction of buildings with reduced energy consumption for heating. Resources and Technology, 13(3), (2016). [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Kuzmenkov, E. Tikhonov, G. Kolesnikov, Thermal Bridges in Wall Panels of Wooden Frame Houses. EECE 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 70, pp.329-336, Springer, Cham, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  25. S. E. Sveen, Energy efficiency wooden module house for North-West Russia – project period 2003-2007. Wooden low-rise housing construction: economy, architecture and resource-saving technologies, pp. 78-82, (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.