EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 264 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 264 (2021) 02005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 264, 2021
International Scientific Conference “Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering” (CONMECHYDRO - 2021)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Road Construction, Building Structures and Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126402005
Published online 02 June 2021
  1. Rashidov T.R., Yuldashev T., and Bekmirzaev D.A., Seismodynamics of Underground Pipelines with Arbitrary Direction of Seismic Loading, Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 55 pp. 243–248 [Google Scholar]
  2. Rashidov T.R., and Bekmirzaev D.A., Seismodynamics of Pipelines Interacting with the Soil Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 52, pp. 149–154, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. Fard S.S., Nekooei M., Oskouei A.V., and Aziminejad A., Experimental and numerical modeling of horizontally-bent buried pipelines crossing fault slip Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 16 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  4. Bekmirzaev D.A., Mirzaev I., Earthquake Resistance Assessment of Buried Pipelines of Complex Configuration Based on Records of Real Earthquakes Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 57, pp. 491–496, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  5. Khachiyan E.E., 2015 On the possibility of predicting seismogram and accelerogram of strong motions of the soil for an earthquake model considered as an instantaneous rupture of the Earth’s surface Seism. Instruments 51, pp. 129–140, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. Bekmirzaev D.A., and Mirzaev I., Dynamic processes in underground pipelines of complex orthogonal configuration at different incidence angles of seismic effect Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 9 2449–2453 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. Stewart H., O’Rourke T., Ha D., Abdoun T., O’Rourke M. and Van Laak P., Split-containers for centrifuge modeling of permanent ground deformation effects on buried pipeline systems Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (Taylor & Francis) (2006) [Google Scholar]
  8. Valeev A.R., Yalalov D.V., 2017 Analysis of methods of seismic protection of main pipelines Transport and storage of oil products and hydrocarbons 3, pp. 38–42, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. Bekmirzaev D.A., Mirzaev I., Mansurova N. Sh., Kosimov E.A., and Juraev D., Numerical methods in the study of seismic dynamics of underground pipelines IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 869 pp. 052035 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  10. O’Rourke M.J., and Liu J., Seismic loading and behavior of buried pipelines Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP (1998) [Google Scholar]
  11. O’Rourke M., and Vargas-Londono T., Analytical Model for Segmented Pipe Response to Tensile Ground Strain Earthq. Spectra 32, pp. 2533–2548, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. Takada S., Hassani N., and Fukuda K., Damage Directivity in Buried Pipelines of Kobe City During the 1995 Earthquake J. Earthq. Eng. 06 00050 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  13. Saberi M., Behnamfar F., and Vafaeian M., A. Continuum Shell-beam Finite Element Modeling of Buried Pipes with 90-degree Elbow Subjected to Earthquake Excitations Int. J. Eng. 28 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. Bekmirzaev D.A., Kishanov R.U., and Mansurova N. Sh., Mathematical Simulation and Solution of the Problem of Seismo-Dynamics of Underground Pipelines Int. J. Emerg. Tr. Eng. Res. 8 5028–5033 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  15. Bekmirzaev D.A., Mansurova N. Sh., Nishonov N.A., Kosimov E.A., and Numonov A., Underground pipelines dynamics problem solution under longitudinal seismic loading IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 883 012045 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  16. Nishonov N.A., Bekmirzaev D.A., An E.V., Urazmukhamedova Z. and Turajonov K., Behaviour and Calculation of Polymer Pipelines Under Real Earthquake Records IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 869 052076 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. Kosimov E.A., Mirzaev I., Bekmirzaev D.A., Comparison of the impacts of harmonic and seismic waves on an underground pipeline during the Gazli earthquake IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1030 012082 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhuang H., Hu Z., Wang X., and Chen G., Seismic responses of a large underground structure in liquefied soils by FEM numerical modelling Bull. Earthq. Eng. 13 364568 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  19. Saberi M., Arabzadeh H., Keshavarz A., Numerical Analysis of Buried Pipelines with Right Angle Elbow under Wave Propagation J. Procedia Engineering 14 3260–3267 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Rourke T.D., Jung J.K., and Argyrou C., Underground pipeline response to earthquake-induced ground deformation Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 91 272–283 (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.