EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 264 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 264 (2021) 03038 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 264, 2021
International Scientific Conference “Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering” (CONMECHYDRO - 2021)
Article Number 03038
Number of page(s) 9
Section Hydraulics of Structures, Hydraulic Engineering and Land Reclamation Construction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126403038
Published online 02 June 2021
  1. Kozlov D.V., Simonovich O.S., and Snezhko V.L. 2020 The Failure Rate of Low-Head Ground Dams of Dangerous and Unsatisfactory Safety Level Power Technology and Engineering 54, pp. 343–348, (2020), DOI: 10.1007/s10749-020-01213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kang M.G., Park S.W. Modeling water flows in a serial irrigation reservoir system considering irrigation return flows and reservoir operations Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier vol. 143(C) pp. 131–141, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Do Amaral L.G.H., Righes A.A.E., Sousa Filho P.D.S. & Costa, R.D., 2005 Automatic regulator for channel flow control on flooded rice Agricultural Water Management Vol 75 Issue 3 pp. 184–193, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  4. Kubrak J., Kubrak E., Kaca E., Kiczko A., and Kubrak M. Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Operating Conditions of a Circular Flap Gate for an Automatic Upstream Water Level Control Water 11 pp. 25–76, (2019), DOI: 10.3390/w11122576. [Google Scholar]
  5. Litrico X., Belaud G., Baume J. and Ribot-Bruno J., Hydraulic Modeling of an Automatic Upstream Water-Level Control Gate Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-asce ,131, pp. 176–189, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hou Caishui. Numerical simulation of hydraulic characteristics of hydro-automatic Gate, Proceedings International Conference on Mechatronic Sciences, Electric Engineering and Computer (MEC) Shenyang China pp. 2739–2742, (2013) DOI: 10.1109/MEC.2013.6885493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Belaud G., Litrico X., de Graaff B., & Baume J., Hydraulic Modeling of an Automatic Upstream Water Level Control Gate for Submerged Flow Conditions 2008 Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-asce 134 pp. 315–326 DOI: 10.1061 / (ASCE) 0733-9437 (2008) 134: 3 (315). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burt C., Angold R., Lehmkuhl M., & Styles S., 2001 Flap gate design for automatic upstream canalwater level control Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-asce 127 pp. 84–91, (2001), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2001)127:2(84). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cassan L., Baume J., Belaud G., Litrico X., Malaterre P., & Ribot-Bruno, J. 2011 Hydraulic Modeling of a Mixed Water Level Control Hydromechanical Gate Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, Engineering-asce 137, pp. 446–453 [Google Scholar]
  10. Koech R.K., Smith R.J., & Gillies M.H., 2010 Furrow irrigation in the Australian cotton industry: alternative water delivery systems and their potential for automation National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture Report No 1002982/1 University of Southern Queensland , Toowoomba Australia [Google Scholar]
  11. Choy S., Weyer E., Reconfiguration schemes to mitigate faults in automated irrigationchannels: Experimental results Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on DecisionandControl San Diego CA USA pp. 2189–2194, (2006), [Google Scholar]
  12. Feliu V., Rivas-Perez R., Castillo G., & Fernando J. Fractional order controller robust to timedelay for water distribution in an irrigation main canal pool Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 69 pp. 185–197, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. Dueck J.G., Pikushchak E.V., & Minkov L.L. Modelling of change of the classifier separation characteristics by water injection into the apparatus. ThermophysAeromech. 16 , pp. 247–258, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhao J., Dong Y., Fu J., Zhao L., & Zhang Y., 2020 Design and experiment of energy-saving water injection pump Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 10(5), pp. 2127–2135, (2020)' DOI: 10.1007/s13202-020-00860-1. [Google Scholar]
  15. Geng Q., Zhou G., & Li Q. The influence of reynolds numbers on resistance properties of et pumps In AIP Conference Proceedings Vol 1573, pp. 514–519, American Institute of PhysicsInc, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. Watson F.R.B., The Production of a Vacuum in an Air Tank by Means of a Steam Jet Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers 124(1) pp. 231–300, (1993) DOI: 10.1243/pime_proc_1933_124_012_02. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gosline J., O'Brien, M., The Water Jet Pump. University of California Publications in Engineering Vol 3 No 3 pp. 167–190, (1934) [Google Scholar]
  18. Vogel R., Theoretical and experimental investigation of air ejectors Maschinenbautechnik Berlin 5 pp. 619–637, (1956) [Google Scholar]
  19. Fridman B.E., Gidroelevatory [Hydroelevators] Moscow Mashgiz Publ (1960) [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Der Lingen T.W., A jet pump design theory. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME 82(4) pp 947–960, (1960) DOI: 10.1115/1.3662812. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cunningham R.G., Gas compression with the liquid jet pump Journal of FluidsEngineering Transactions of the ASME 96(3) pp 203–215, (1974), DOI: 10.1115/1.3447143. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cunningham R.G., Dopkin R.J., Jit breakup and mixing throat lengts for the liquid jit gas pump Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME 96(3), pp 216–226, (1974), DOI: 10.1115/1.3447144. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu X., Research of the design theory for liquid state jet pumps Scientia Sinica Series A:Mathematical, Physical, Astronomical & Technical Sciences 26(2), pp. 214–224, (1983) [Google Scholar]
  24. Sugati D., Effendy M., RANS study of the liquid jet gas ejector, InAIP Conference Proceedings American Institute of Physics Inc. Vol 1983 (1) p.020006, (2018), DOI: 10.1063/1.5046202. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.