Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 267, 2021
7th International Conference on Energy Science and Chemical Engineering (ICESCE 2021)
Article Number 02041
Number of page(s) 4
Section Environmental Chemistry Research and Chemical Preparation Process
Published online 04 June 2021
  1. Beaudoin Y C, Boswell R, Dallimore S R, et al. Frozen Heat -A Global Outlook on Methane Gas Hydrates. Norway: Birkeland Trykkeri A/S, 1-29, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. Li X S, Xu C G, Zhang Y, et al. Investigation into gas production from natural gas hydrate: A review. Applied Energy, 172:286-322(2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. Paull C K, Dillon W P. Natural Gas Hydrates: Occurrence, Distribution, and Detection. Handbook of Hydrocarbon & Lipid Microbiology, 1(522):413–434(2001) [Google Scholar]
  4. Yokoyama T, Nakatsuka Y. Monitoring System of Seafloor Deformation for Methane Hydrate Production Test. The Japanese Geotechnical Society, 63:26-29 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  5. Stenvold T, Eiken O, Zumberge M, et al. High-Precision Relative Depth and Subsidence Mapping from Seafloor Water Pressure Measurements. Spe Journal, 11(3):380-389 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  6. Hall S A, Macbeth C, Barkved O I, et al. Time-lapse seismic monitoring of compaction and subsidence at Valhall through cross-matching and interpreted warping of 3D streamer and OBC data. Seg Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 21(1):1696 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  7. Higley P, Woolsey J R, Goodman R, et al. support of gulf of mexico hydrate research consortium: activities to support establishment of a sea floor monitoring station project. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports (2005) [Google Scholar]
  8. Nagakubo S, Arata N, Yabe I, et al. Environmental impact assessment study on Japan’s methane hydrate R&D program. Fire Ice, 11: 4-11(2011) [Google Scholar]
  9. Waarum I K, Sparrevik P, Kvistedal Y, et al. Innovative Methods for Methane Leakage Monitoring Near Oil and Gas Installations. Offshore Technology Conference (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. Takahashi H, Asakawa E, Hayashi T, et al. Development of Ocean Bottom Multi-component Seismic System for Methane Hydrate Dissociation Monitoring. American Geophysical Union (2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. Shang K, Guo X, Wu J, Jia Y. Detecting cold spring gas leakage in seabed sediment with marine multi-electrode resistivity method:numerical simulation and experiment. Haiyang Xuebao, 039(011): 85-96 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. Breen S J, Carrigan C R, LaBrecque D J, et al. Bench-scale experiments to evaluate electrical resistivity tomography as a monitoring tool for geologic CO2 sequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 9: 484-494 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  13. Terry N, Slater L, Comas X, et al. Free phase gas processes in a northern peatland inferred from autonomous field - scale resistivity imaging. Water Resources Research, 52(4) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. Schütze C, Sauer U, Beyer K, et al. Natural analogues: a potential approach for developing reliable monitoring methods to understand subsurface CO2 migration processes. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(2): 411-423 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. Mendonça C A, Doherty R, Amaral N D, et al. Resistivity and induced polarization monitoring of biogas combined with microbial ecology at a brownfield site. 3(4): SAB43-SAB56 (2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.