EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 268 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 268 (2021) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 268, 2021
2020 6th International Symposium on Vehicle Emission Supervision and Environment Protection (VESEP2020)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126801004
Published online 11 June 2021
  1. Vellaiyan, S. and K.S. Amirthagadeswaran, Influence of Water-in-Diesel Emulsion Fuel and Compression Ratio on Combustion, Performance and Emission Characteristics of Diesel Engine. Sciendo, 2016. 3(3). [Google Scholar]
  2. Hairuddin, A.A., T. Yusaf, and A.P. Wandel, A review of hydrogen and natural gas addition in diesel HCCI engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014. 32: p. 739–761. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kumar, V., et al., Production of biodiesel and bioethanol using algal biomass harvested from fresh water river. Renewable Energy, 2018. 116: p. 606–612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, Z., et al., Combustion behaviors of a compression-ignition engine fuelled with diesel/methanol blends under various fuel delivery advance angles. Bioresource Technology, 2004. 95(3): p. 331–341. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, C., et al., Study of the characteristics of PM and the correlation of soot and smoke opacity on the diesel methanol dual fuel engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019. 148: p. 391–403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, Z.H., et al., Effect of fumigation methanol and ethanol on the gaseous and particulate emissions of a direct-injection diesel engine. Atmospheric Environment, 2011. 45 (11): p. 2001–2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fang Ping, et al., Nano-CeO2-based solid solution catalyzed combustion of carbon particles in diesel engines (in English). Chinese Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2007(08): p. 1275–1280. [Google Scholar]
  8. Venu, H. and V. Madhavan, Effect of Al2O3 nanoparticles in biodiesel-diesel-ethanol blends at various injection strategies: Performance, combustion and emission characteristics. Fuel, 2016. 186. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khatri, D. and R. Goyal, Effects of silicon dioxide nanoparticles on the performance and emission features at different injection timings using water diesel emulsified fuel. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020. 205. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu, T., et al., Effect of diesel late-injection on combustion and emissions characteristics of diesel/methanol dual fuel engine. Fuel, 2018. 233: p. 317–327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yao Chunde, et al., Experimental study on the effect of different methanol substitution ratios on DMCC emissions. Journal of Internal Combustion Engines, 2008(02): p. 134–139. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ning, L., et al., A comparative study on the combustion and emissions of a non-road common rail diesel engine fueled with primary alcohol fuels (methanol, ethanol, and n- butanol)/diesel dual fuel. Fuel, 2020. 266: p. 117–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Soukht Saraee, H., et al., Reduction of emissions and fuel consumption in a compression ignition engine using nanoparticles. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2015. 12 (7): p. 2245–2252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, Z., et al., Effects of diesel and methanol injection timing on combustion, performance, and emissions of a diesel engine fueled with directly injected methanol and pilot diesel. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019. 163: p. 114–234. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu Qimin, et al., Nano fuel additive CeO2 improves diesel combustion efficiency and reduces emissions. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2013. 29 (09): p. 64–69. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wei, L., et al., Combustion and emission characteristics of a turbocharged diesel engine using high premixed ratio of methanol and diesel fuel. Fuel, 2015. 140: p. 156163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nanthagopal, K., et al., Influence on the effect of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles as an additive with Calophyllum inophyllum methyl ester in a CI engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017. 146: p. 8–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Annamalai, M., et al., An assessment on performance, combustion and emission behavior of a diesel engine powered by ceria nanoparticle blended emulsified biofuel. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016. 123: p. 372–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Venu, H. and V. Madhavan, Effect of Al2O3 nanoparticles in biodiesel-diesel-ethanol blends at various injection strategies: Performance, combustion and emission characteristics. Fuel, 2016. 186: p. 176–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Aalam, C.S., C.G. Saravanan, and M. Kannan, Experimental investigations on a CRDI system assisted diesel engine fuelled with aluminium oxide nanoparticles blended biodiesel. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2015. 54 (3): p. 351–358. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ithnin, A.M., et al., An overview of utilizing water-in-diesel emulsion fuel in diesel engine and its potential research study. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2014. 87 (4): p. 273–288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vellaiyan, S. and C.M.A. Partheeban, Combined effect of water emulsion and ZnO nanoparticle on emissions pattern of soybean biodiesel fuelled diesel engine. Renewable Energy, 2020. 149: p. 1157–1166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Karthikeyan, S., A. Elango, and A. Prathima, Diesel engine performance and emission analysis using canola oil methyl ester with the nano sized zinc oxide particles. Indian journal of engineering and materials sciences, 2014. 21 (1): p. 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shaafi, T. and R. Velraj, Influence of alumina nanoparticles, ethanol and isopropanol blend as additive with diesel - soybean biodiesel blend fuel: Combustion, engine performance and emissions. Renewable Energy, 2015. 80: p. 655–663. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.