Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 271, 2021
2021 2nd International Academic Conference on Energy Conservation, Environmental Protection and Energy Science (ICEPE 2021)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02011 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Environmental Protection and Green Application of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127102011 | |
| Published online | 15 June 2021 | |
- Pan, Y., R. Yin, and Z. Huang. “Energy modeling of two office buildings with data center for green building design.” Steel Construction 40.7(2008):1145–1152. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, Z., Fan, Z., Tam, V. W. Y., Bian, Y., Li, S., & Illankoon, I. M. C. S., et al. (2018). Green building evaluation system implementation. Building and Environment, 133 (APR.), 32–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pan, B. Y., & Liu, J. P. (2011). Building the assessment and evaluation system of green residential area. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 71–78, 134–137. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, & Bing. (2012). Research on evaluation principle and method for green building. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 193–194, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
- Bao, X. Y., & Wang, Q. C. (2013). A comprehensive evaluation study of green building degree based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 256–259, 3033–3037. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, L., Lin, Y., Wang, L., Cao, J., Wang, D., & Xue, P., et al. (2017). An integrated local climatic evaluation system for green sustainable eco-city construction: a case study in shenzhen, china. Building & Environment, 114, 82–95. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, & Bing. (2012). Research on evaluation principle and method for green building. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 193–194, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S. L., Hao, P. L., & Song, Y. X. (2011). An exploration of establishment of green building evaluation standards weight system based on analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 71–78, 4166–4169. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, B., & Zhao, X. Y. (2014). Comparing the core evaluation system for green building at home and broad. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 507, 163–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mao, D., Zhou, K., Zheng, S. J., Liu, Y. D., & Liu, Y. P. (2011). Research on evaluation system of green building in china. Advanced Materials Research, 224, 159–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q., Feng, X. P., Tian, B., & Li, C. T. (2014). Study on the evaluation index system and evaluation method for the building energy-saving and green building demonstration zone. Advanced Materials Research, 962-965(12), 1612–1615. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X., Zhan, C., Wang, X., & Li, G. (2019). Asian green building rating tools: a comparative study on scoring methods of quantitative evaluation systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218(MAY 1), 880–895. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Qi-Gan, S., James, L., Sung-Shun, W., & Yen-Ching, C. (2018). Improving the green building evaluation system in china based on the danp method. Sustainability, 10(4), 1173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.